https://thefourthempire.blogspot.com/20 ... s-and.html
August 05, 2020
MY EMAIL TO RUSSIAN PROSECUTORS AND MILITARY URGING THEM TO INVESTIGATE PUTIN FOR CONSPIRING WITH TRUMP TO CAUSE MASS DEATHS IN RUSSIA
I SENT MORE OR LESS THE SAME TEXT AND ALL THE SAME EVIDENCE (SEE PREVIOUS POST FOR LINKS) TO THE RUSSIAN PROSECUTORS AS TO THE US PROSECUTORS BECAUSE EVIDENCE IN GREEK CRIMINAL PROBE E17 449 SHOWS TRUMP, KUHSNER MUST HAVE BEEN INSTIGATED BY PUTIN IN 2016 TO JOIN IN A GLOBAL EPIDEMIC DISEASE PLOT FOR FINANCIAL MOTIVES.
.....................................................................................................................................................
THIS IS THE FIRST OF A TWO PART SUBMISSION
Dear Interior Minister Vladimir Kolokoltsev
Dear Prosecutor General Igor Krasnov,
Dear Members of the Russian Military, Police, Academic Institutions,
A criminal probe E 17 449 was opened in 2017 in Greece into Donald Trump and Jared Kushner for using criminal means to have a journalist, myself, arrested for reporting on the allegations of a Kremlin based journalist Alexander Zamyslov, who interviewed me in Larisa in June 2016 on a plan to spread bioweapons in the USA and the rest of the world and then implement mass vaccination, that Jared Kushner helped him obtain visas as I describe in the report attached "GRK criminal probe into Trump&Kuhsner".
Although Vladimir Putin is not explicitly mentioned in the probe, it is to be presumed that he joined in the conspiracy to have me silenced for exposing his links to Trump and Kushner and to an epidemic disease plot and I urge you to investigate.
The Kremlin based journalists, as my email correspondence with them attached shows, seem to have identified a report I submitted to the FBI in 2009 about the swine flu crisis as having critical information about the global disease plot which they were researching.
The current coronavirus crisis does seem to be characterized by broadly the same elements as the swine flu plot of 2009, and this similarity may be considered to be more evidence that the coronavirus crisis is, indeed, a plot, which was being researched, planned, developed and prepared as early as 2016 with the knowledge and help of Trump and Kushner, and presumably on the instigation of Vladimir Putin.
Please find a copy of the FBI report attached.
The fact that the current coronavirus is proceeding broadly according to the plan I outlined in a report to the FBI in 2009, will help prosecutors focus their attention on specific areas, especially on the risks of the coronavirus vaccine.
The aim of the epidemic disease plot is to cause mass deaths, harm, poisoning and the main means are the "unproven" vaccines allowed under so called emergency rules, that is to say, the coronavirus vaccines are the "killing system" of such a plot and pose an especial threat to the Russian people and army as well as the rest of the world.
I urge you to open an immediate investigation into whether Putin has joined in a conspiracy with Trump and Kushner and other actors to mass poison the Russian people using unproven vaccines, specifically the Astra Zeneca coronavirus vaccines developed in the UK.
The motive, I allege, for the plot to mass poison Russians is to quell social unrest due to the economic crisis caused, largely, by policies of Putin, and of the Russian private central bank printing money as debt, as well as the drop in oil prices.
The criminal probe E 17 449 has been suspended or quashed clearly under political influence of Trump and Putin.
As I demonstrate, the exact same original crime which triggered the criminal probe E 17 449 in the first place, has, in the meantime, advanced and culminated in an indictment E 17 378 against me specifically for reporting on those allegations of Zamyslov on 15th February 2017 as well as a for a post critical of Trump on 7th February 2017.
Please see attachment
Indictment E17 378 annotated
for a copy of the indictment in Greek
I face a draconian penalty at the next trial, now scheduled for 16th December 2020 as I explain in my report.
Please see attachment for a copy of the
E17378trialdateDec20
As I demonstrate in my report, these criminal charges E 17 378 specifically for my blog posts on 7th February 2017 and on 15th February 2017 have no basis in law whatsoever.
In fact, the indictment and trial as it is now framed offers sufficient proof to charge Putin, Trump and Kushner with arranging for a criminal network superimposed on Larisa court to undertake nakedly criminal acts and violate all procedures and rights in a brutal and lawless attempt to imprison and silence (murder) a journalist to deprive the public of knowledge of a global epidemic disease plot and their role in it using the empty forms of law.
I believe this is the first time ever in history that a sitting President in the USA and in Russia can be indicted on the basis of crimes recorded in official court documents in Greece for 1) trying to silence a journalist and 2) trying to commit mass murder using bioterrorism or biological warfare.
I have sent the same information to US prosecutors and military because they are also targets and urge cooperation.
The contents of the documents, emails and other records which constitute that probe with the file number E 17 /449 are at the Dikastiko Megaro, Larisa, Greece.
Please find attached
a) record of email correspondence with Kremlin based journalists Christina Fadeeva to set up an interview in June 2016
b) criminal charges against me one day after I reported on 15th Februrary 2017 on allegations made by the journalist Alexander Zamsylov concerning Jared Kushner by lawyer Simos Samaras known to Alexander Zamsylov, which were obtained my misrepresenting a temporary 30 day civil injunction covering 10 posts which had expired and which was issued illegally
c) my criminal charges over an attempt to have me arrested using criminal means focussing on Kushner's role in that bioweapons plot as a possible motive
d) my testimony to the police magistrate in November 2017 in which Kushner and Trump are named as the people with the motive for firing James Comey just after I exposed this plot (fear of more scrutiny from James Comey and FBI over their Russia links)
e) my indictment E 17 378 citing as the temporary 30 day civil injunction covering 10 posts which had expired and which was issued illegally and which triggered a criminal probe as the only basis for the trial
f) the new trial date for 16th December 2020
As well as proof of my nationality and residence in Larisa in the form of electricity bills.
The second part of this submission follows shortly and discusses the second criminal probe Delta 15 218 opened in Greece in 2015 into a murder attempt against me which collected evidence against George Soros, Bill Gates and Alexis Tsipras. All the police reports were suppressed in huge violations of procedure and rights to set me up for another trial.
Reference to this second part is made in the submission below because the two cases have to be taken together for reasons I show.
I also give evidence that a criminal network in the Austrian government, specifically Sebastian Kurz and Werner Faymann, have joined in the epidemic plot conspiracy of Trump, Kushner and Putin, Soros and Gatesto have silence me, a dual Austrian citizen, refused diplomatic and other help from the Austrian government to ensure I have a fair trial, in the second part.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you for your attention.
Jane Burgermeister
Statistics: Posted by chump — Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by seemslikeadream — Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:37 pm
July 6, 2018: A day after blacking out on a highway in Colorado, Glenn Campbell discovers what appears to be metastasized cancer throughout his body. He settles on his attitude and has decided, with this video, to make his situation public.
Glenn’s main website: http://glenn-campbell.com
Statistics: Posted by elfismiles — Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:18 pm
18.05.2018 - Reports on impacts of EMR (electromagnetic radiations) on wildlife
EKLIPSE invited a wide range of experts from different disciplines to discuss the current knowledge on the effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) on wildlife. The aim was to highlight the current state of the art in this field, to identify knowledge gaps related to the impacts on different taxonomic groups, to discuss the technical aspects and methodologies used in current studies, and to identify and prioritize key research needs and policy recommendations.
The two reports related to the web conference are now available:
1/ The Current Knowledge Overview report explains the work done by the Expert Steering Group in analysing a representative set of the peer-reviewed literature and include their findings which consist of:
a list of the main results extracted from the studies
an assessment of the quality of the reviewed papers and studies
the identification of knowledge gaps
2/ The Web Conference report outlines the outcomes of the discussions that took place during the web conference and consists of:
feedback from the participants on the first document
lists of research needs and policy recommendations identified by the participants
More information on the web conference and its outcomes can be found on the dedicated webpage.
Electromagnetic radiation from power lines and phone masts poses 'credible' threat to wildlife, report finds
By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor
18 May 2018 • 12:01am
Electromagnetic radiation from power lines, wi-fi, phone masts and broadcast transmitters poses a ‘credible’ threat to wildlife, a new report suggests, as environmentalists warned the 5G roll out could cause greater harm.
An analysis of 97 studies by the EU-funded review body EKLIPSE concluded that radiation is a potential risk to insect and bird orientation and plant health.
However the charity Buglife warned that despite good evidence of the harms there was little research ongoing to assess the impact, or apply pollution limits.
The charity said ‘serious impacts on the environment could not be ruled out’ and called for 5G transmitters to be placed away from street lights, which attract insects, or areas where they could harm wildlife.
Matt Shardlow, CEO of Buglife said: “We apply limits to all types of pollution to protect the habitability of our environment, but as yet, even in Europe, the safe limits of electromagnetic radiation have not been determined, let alone applied.
“There is a credible risk that 5G could impact significantly on wildlife, and that placing transmitters on LED street lamps, which attract nocturnal insects such as moths increases exposure and thereby risk.
“Therefore we call for all 5G pilots to include detailed studies of their influence and impacts on wildlife, and for the results of those studies to be made public.”
Buglife called for 5G transmitters to be moved away from street lights where insects are drawn
As of March, 237 scientists have signed an appeal to the United Nations asking them to take the risks posed by electromagnetic radiation more seriously.
The EKLIPSE report found that the magnetic orientation of birds, mammals and invertebrates such as insects and spiders could be disrupted by electromagnetic radiation (EMR). It also found established that plant metabolism is also altered by EMR.
The authors of the review conclude that there is “an urgent need to strengthen the scientific basis of the knowledge on EMR and their potential impacts on wildlife.
“ In particular, there is a need to base future research on sound, high-quality, replicable experiments so that credible, transparent and easily accessible evidence can inform society and policy-makers to make decisions and frame their policies.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/201 ... -credible/
Statistics: Posted by elfismiles — Fri May 18, 2018 11:45 am
elfismiles » 10 May 2017 14:28 wrote:
Over Population and Under Education ... "winning" combination!
Meanwhile...
Former Area-51 "Desert Rat" Glenn Campbell's series on THE BABY BOMB!
The Baby Bomb: How Demographics are Destroying the World (Part 1)
iframe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9iMkx7RhcQ
Baby Bomb Part 2: World Tour of Demographic Disasters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFUBm2mX6t4
Baby Bomb Part 3: Dilution - Who is having the babies?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1t5sh_7YFxY
... and more ...
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9o0ba ... QNg/videos
http://glenn-campbell.com/past/
http://www.ufomind.com/area51/desertrat/
May 16, 2018
Baby Bust: Fertility is Declining the Most Among Minority Women
by Lyman Stone, @lymanstoneky
Category: Fertility, Race, Education
The United States just hit a 40-year low in its fertility rate, according to numbers just released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 2017 provisional estimate of fertility for the entire U.S. indicates about 3.85 million births in 2017 and a total fertility rate of about 1.76 births per women. These are low numbers: births were as high as 4.31 million in 2007, and the total fertility rate was 2.08 kids back then. The United States has experienced a remarkable slump in fertility over the last several years, as I’ve explained elsewhere.
Since 2007, fertility has fallen the most for the youngest women, but in the last year, declines have set in for women in their 30s as well. Fertility declines increasingly seem to be about much more than just postponed fertility, or else these women must be planning to have some very fertile 40s.
At least through 2016, this trend appeared to be mostly driven by changes in marital status. Births to never-married women are down more than births to ever-married women: age-adjusted marital fertility is down 14% since 2007, while age-adjusted never-married fertility is down 21%, as of 2016. Preliminary data from several states suggest these trends are likely to continue in 2017.
When it comes to discussions about declining fertility, conservatives tend to “get it” right away: not having a next generation, or having a far smaller one, will cause problems down the line. In my experience, progressives tend to be more hesitant: is this a back-door argument to keep women out of the workplace? No; in fact, there’s robust empirical evidence most women want more kids. Is this some science-denying attempt to ignore climate change? Again, no; in fact, no plausible trajectory of U.S. fertility has any appreciable impact on carbon emissions. And, one question I find the most perplexing, is this some underhanded racist argument that white people need to pick up the pace of baby-making to out-compete minorities?
It’s true that some people in the right wing have flirted dangerously close to, and sometimes engaged in, the kind of racialized thinking that has tarred pro-fertility initiatives throughout the 20th century, complaining about “other peoples’ babies,” or quietly suggesting that if African Americans have fewer kids, maybe that’s a good thing.
At the end of the day, though, racists on the right are wrong (and comparatively few in number), but so are the progressives who assume that calls for more babies are racially driven.
That’s because the decline in fertility has been far greater among minorities than among non-Hispanic whites. If we take age-specific birth rates from the peak-fertility year of 2007 and apply them to each age cohort in 2008-2016, the most recent complete data, we can create a counterfactual scenario of how many babies would have been born if age-adjusted fertility rates had not fallen after 2007. From 2008 to 2016, the deficit turns out to be between 4.1 and 4.6 million missing babies: basically, an entire year’s worth or more of childbearing vanished.
The deficit varies across racial and ethnic groups. American Indians and Alaska Natives have it worst among racial groups, having lost a whopping 15% of expected fertility from 2008 to 2016, or about 83,000 births, with total fertility rates falling from 1.62 births per woman to a shockingly low 1.23. It’s unclear exactly why Native American fertility has fallen so quickly and why it is so low, but they are indisputably the hardest-hit race in the fertility declines of the last 10 years.
Then come African Americans, who are missing 9.6% of expected births, or about 700,000 births, which is only slightly more severe than whites, who are missing 9.3%, or about 3.2 million births. Black fertility declined from 2.15 births per woman to 1.89, while white fertility fell from 2.14 to 1.82. Asians experienced a less severe decline, but their fertility was somewhat lower to start with.
In racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist: it’s hammered Native Americans and Hispanics particularly hard, and hit even African Americans harder than whites generally, and certainly harder than non-Hispanic whites.
But the “white” fertility figure is a bit misleading, as it includes most Hispanics, who have historically had much higher birth rates than non-Hispanic whites. Looking at all Hispanics together, these women are missing nearly 19% of the babies that would have been born from 2008-2016, or about 2.2 million births, as their age-adjusted fertility rates have fallen from 2.85 births per woman to just 2.1, and continue to decline. Meanwhile, non-Hispanic fertility has only declined from 1.95 births per woman to 1.72, yielding about 2.3 million missing births. Solidly half of the missing kids over the last decade would have been born to Hispanic mothers, despite the fact that Hispanics only make up about a quarter of fertility-age women.
Thus, in racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist: it’s hammered Native Americans and Hispanics particularly hard, and hit even African Americans harder than whites generally, and certainly harder than non-Hispanic whites. The call to boost fertility is far from being a call for whites to keep up with minority fertility; rather, it’s an exhortation that we need to be listening to the fertility desires of women of racial and ethnic minorities, who are experiencing precipitous declines in fertility, largely unnoticed by the white-dominated world of mommy-blogs and late-in-life fertility treatments. Any serious pro-natal policy in America worth its salt would primarily result in birth gains among minority mothers, not white ones. Accelerating the national birth rate would also accelerate the pace at which the non-Hispanic white population share declines.
The effect is electorally significant, as well. These lost births are not distributed evenly around the country, as the figure below shows.
Some states have lost far more births than others, while lucky North Dakota has seen an increase in births. But even as declining fertility makes the country’s population whiter, it is making the country’s politics redder: on average, states won by Clinton in 2016 are missing 9% of their expected births since 2008, whereas states Trump won are missing just 7.8%. Within states, Hispanic-, Native American-, and African American-dominated places are seeing the steepest population growth underperformance as a result of missing births. During the 2020 Census apportionment and redistricting process, this will all combine to weaken the political power of minority-heavy areas. The map of declines in 2017 suggests that the observed decline in minority fertility through 2016 almost certainly continued in 2017.
In terms of change in age-adjusted fertility, the sharpest declines in births have been in Arizona, where fertility has fallen from 2.47 births per woman in 2007, to an estimated 1.81 in 2017. Provisional data from early 2018 suggests these declines are likely to continue. Arizona is double-whammied by two different racial or ethnic trends: steep declines among Hispanics and steep declines among Native Americans. Both groups make up a larger share of Arizona’s population than the national average. Both groups have seen steep declines within Arizona; steeper even than their peers in other states.
Other factors are at work, too. Fertility has fallen somewhat more for less educated than for more educated women. Age-adjusted fertility has fallen 15% for women with a bachelor’s degree or less, versus just 7% for women with graduate degrees. On the whole, births to women with no bachelor’s have totaled 12% below what would be expected if 2007 fertility rates had continued, yielding 3.1 million missing births, while births to women with a bachelor’s degree are down 10% for 1.1 million missing births, and births to women with a graduate degree are down just 7%, or 300,000.
In relative terms, these differences are smaller than differences by age or race, suggesting that socioeconomic class is not the biggest driver of changing fertility rates. This is borne out using other variables: Having insurance or not doesn’t seem to make any difference in fertility changes since 2007, and household income also has no clear, linear trend. With more covariates, these factors might have a stronger effect, but they aren’t the dominant story of declining fertility. There are plenty of other factors that could be looked at, but the basic conclusion is pretty straightforward.
Race, ethnicity, marital status, and geography are the best predictors of changes in fertility over the last decade. Fertility declines are most strongly associated with factors that are race- or region-specific, not broadly class-specific, as different economic classes appear to have quite similar trends. This doesn’t rule out all economic causes: there are important interactions between race and socioeconomic class. But this association does suggest two key takeaways to be kept in mind when discussing declining fertility: it is disproportionately landing on minority moms, births have fallen most for unmarried women, and economically-oriented solutions may only have modest direct effects.
Lyman Stone is a Research Fellow at the Institute for Family Studies, and an International Economist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, where he forecasts cotton market conditions. He blogs about migration, population dynamics, and regional economics at In a State of Migration.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fe ... rity-women
Statistics: Posted by elfismiles — Thu May 17, 2018 9:17 am
Statistics: Posted by elfismiles — Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:17 pm
Statistics: Posted by elfismiles — Mon Nov 30, 2015 1:30 pm
Gran spends nearly £4,000 to protect her house against wi-fi and mobile phone signals
Stefanie Russell with the device that detects wireless signals and in the background, a workman painting the house
First published Tuesday 21 October 2014 in News
Last updated 10:25 Tuesday 21 October 2014 . Exclusive by Flora Thompson
A GRANDMOTHER has spent thousands of pounds making her home wi-fi proof to protect her health.
Stefanie Russell, 72, from Steyning, claims radiation from wi-fi internet and mobile phone signals give her headaches and nausea which make it impossible for her to be near some types of technology.
She believes her symptoms are caused by electro-sensitivity, which makes her so ill she cannot travel on buses because of the number of portable devices being used.
She said: “I’ve not been diagnosed by a doctor but my GP surgery is aware of my condition. Every time I am near wi-fi or mobile phone signals I feel ill.
It makes it difficult for me to get around and see people. I don’t touch the internet or email – it’s not safe.”
After researching the topic and reading articles which warn of health consequences as serious as cancer, Mrs Russell decided she needed to take drastic steps to protect her wellbeing.
She shuns computers and mobile phones and has spent £4,000 hiring specialists to cover her house in Shooting Fields in four coats of thick, ray-repelling paint.
She said: “The painting inside and outside my house is nearly complete. I feel much better now I’m more protected.
“I have a device which helps me to detect how many wireless signals are near and I’m reassured that I will not have unwanted wi-fi guests coming into my home.”
Her next mission is to appeal to schools to listen to the warnings about wi-fi and shield children from possible health risks. She has also sought the help of St Andrew’s Church in Steyning.
She added: “Schools could use broadband instead of wi-fi, protecting them from early exposure to radiation.
“This is important – exposing them at an early age is essentially ‘cooking’ our children.”
The NHS Knowledge Service website said some studies which claimed the symptoms were psychosomatic raise “interesting points” and showed the importance of scientific research.
Symptoms are not all in the mind, claims company boss
STUDIES suggesting symptoms of electro-sensitivity are ‘all in the mind’ are flawed, the managing director of a radiation-repelling company has claimed.
Glynn Hughes, the boss of Block Radiation, which runs websites including wireless- protection.org, thinks research which claims people do not suffer from symptoms of electro-sensitivity do not paint an accurate picture.
And he believes health experts are discouraged into investigating further because the technology industry is a lucrative market for the economy.
The World Health Organisation has warned that overexposure to the use of mobile phones could have major health implications.
Mr Hughes’s company, from Lancashire, is assisting Stefanie Russell with the changes to her house in Steyning.
He said: “This is similar to everyone’s perceptions of smoking 50 years ago. No-one believed it was bad for your health until later on.”
He said everyone is electro-sensitive but only some people are acutely affected.
He said: “I know a 20-year-old girl who has to spend 23 hours a day in the dark after electro-sensitivity caused her to become light sensitive.”
Mr Hughes left his job building large wireless networks in the telecommunications industry after he claims he discovered the health risks first hand when his own daughter became ill.
He said: “Her school had a phone mast on its roof, eight foot from the children and she didn’t really get better until it was taken down.”
Mrs Russell employed Mr Hughes to survey her home and his company painted another Brighton house earlier this year.
He said: “It’s quite an environmentally friendly area and we’ve have a handful of clients here.”
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/11547439 ... e_signals/
Statistics: Posted by elfismiles — Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by BrandonD — Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by semper occultus — Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:32 am