by rothbardian » Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:05 pm
I just got through reading Trance-formation of America for the first time. I had seen numerous quotes and excerpts over the last couple of years.<br><br>It's a testimony of a 'mind-controlled' slave who was abused at the hands of top political leaders and others, for many years.<br><br>My impression is that the book is riddled with corroborative, supporting elements. It has a resounding 'ring of truth' in my opinion.<br><br>Obviously, the most dramatic corroboration has to do with Dick Cheney's private parts. Cheney's dramatically oversized pee-pee is referred to five different times in O'Brien's book which was written back in 1995.<br><br>A full decade later, in 2005, there was much snickering and guffawing as a revealing photo of Cheney made it's way through the Internet. It was clear to see in this photo, that O'Brien knew what she was talking about. I'll spare you the actual photo but here's the link:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www12.brinkster.com/poptarts/dickcheney.jpg">www12.brinkster.com/popta...cheney.jpg</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>If she was telling the truth about her sexual and mind control slavery in regard to Cheney, why would she make up the rest of it? The book itself started off as a legal document and was a very earnest effort on O'Brien's part to seek justice for herself and her daughter.<br><br>A number of other survivors have reported sexual abuse and slavery at the hands of an extremely wide variety of political leaders, and business and entertainment celebrities. Therefore when she provides other names and describes the reprehensible behavior of these people, I don't know why I shouldn't be greatly swayed by her credibility.<br><br>She describes brutal experiences with <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Reagan</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Bush Sr. and Jr</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->., <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Gerald Ford</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Hillary Clinton</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Robert Byrd</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, a "satanic" <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Lamar Alexander</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, a savage torture experience with <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Patrick Leahy</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->. <br><br>Other perpetrators who are part of O'Brien testimony-- <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>De la Madrid (Mexican president), Jimmy Buffet, Lee Greenwood, Sparky Anderson, Tommy Lasorda, Nolan Ryan.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>She tells of the White House virtually having it's own private pornographer who would create customized films involving the sex slaves. Reagan apparently had a huge penchant for bestiality films involving O'Brien.<br><br>Another corroborating element is her description of huge involvement in drug-smuggling on the part of government leaders. She quotes Cheney saying to her that Vice-President Bush is just that...the president of 'vice' (referring to drug-smuggling). <br><br>She also describes Clinton as being deeply involved. Again, this is all being written about, way back in 1995. Who knew? It wasn't until 1998 that Gary Webb came out with his report ("Dark Alliance") about high-level drug-smuggling.<br><br>I've tried to look at the 'other side of the story' but, for example, Martin Cannon's attempt to debunk is badly botched and full of factual errors which, to me, belied an odd prejudice against O'Brien's overall story.<br><br>And precious few debunkers have come forward since the dramatic Cheney corroboration to do their penance, adding even more to their credibility problems.<br><br>For example, we have the hallowed (at least here at RI) Kathleen Sullivan, who has made sniffy remarks about O'Brien not being good-looking enough to have been a slave, whereas supposedly Sullivan was. <br><br>I have seen photos of both of these women in their younger years and let's just say I find Sullivan's claims confusing. See below photo of a younger O'Brien.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.mosquito-verlag.de/images/trance/cathy_obrien.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br> <br>Again, the problem for me with those who attempt to dismiss everything or much of what O'Brien is saying is this-- <br><br>If the centerpiece of her story is true, and she and her daughter were enslaved and abused by Cheney...<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>why risk discrediting and thus lose your target (bringing Cheney to justice)</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> by wildly embellishing and falsely accusing a bunch of people who are liable to come up with alibis? <br><br>The fact is that these astonishing and otherwise unbelievable tales have been echoed over and over...by Paul Bonacci and Alicia Owen (of the Franklin scandal), Brice Taylor and many more.<br><br>There is widespread pedophilia and sexual assaults being perpetrated by a wide array of political leaders and other powerful and influential people. We're seeing it all around the world. So...I'm not sure what the huge 'hang-up' is here. <br><br>Yes, O'Brien's husband was involved in the intelligence community, but there are supposedly good guys AND bad guys in that world. If there are "disinformation" purposes here, I don't know what they might be.<br><br>Maybe somebody has some insights or some angles that I haven't thought of.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>