by AnnaLivia » Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Scoopnz has oodles on blackbox voting, too. Here’s them:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0505/S00327.htm">www.scoop.co.nz/stories/H...S00327.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>it was in my bookmarks, so this goes to an older article, but you can easily ‘get there from here’. they were onto diebold from the start. I used my old link because on re-read, I thought I ought to share this, even though it is off-topic. So allow me just a little snip from the page you'll get:<br><br>Maybe progressive journalists who "speak truth to power" should bestow a more accurate name on the DOD: the "Department of Aggression" ("DOA"). <br><br>The Bottom Line: Might As Well Face It, We're (economically)Addicted To War. <br><br>One certainly need not be a pacifist to recognize that the Exhibits A-D provide powerful evidence that the USA is economically addicted to war. If so, this would explain why our political system is dominated by the ultra-militarist War Party and the crypto-fascist Bush family (i.e., the pushers), while our economic system is dominated by the military-industrial complex and its mafiosiesque war-profiteers (i.e., the kingpins).<br> <br>Finally, if the USA is economically addicted to war, that raises some important moral questions. Readers of good conscience should be asking themselves: "Am I willing to engage in loving acts of nonviolent noncooperation with evil in order to stop my nation's wars of aggression? Or will I watch in craven silence as this nation descends - like the Bush family's multigenerational war-profiteers - into a vampiric career of bloodthirsty murderousness? If it's the latter, won't I be sending America's children the depraved message that it's permissible to murder people, so long as it's profitable? Which destiny am I going to choose -- nonviolent redemption or militaristic perdition?"<br> <br>In short, we've proved in Iraq that violence only begets more violence, and war more wars. It's time to show the world the force of our example, not the example of our force. <br><br>me again. we do all know and talk to others about Instant Runoff Voting, don't we? and ditto the fact that public financing of campaigns equals spending millions on the front end to save trillions on the backend?<br><br>or do we need to have a discussion of these two great ideas?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>