TOMFLOCCO:BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED!

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

But wait-- there's more...

Postby marykmusic » Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:06 am

<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ...With that you get...<br>The real story, from Citizen Spook. Here's part of it:<br><br>INTELLIGENCE SPECULATION<br><br>Before I get to the cold hard facts of the law, I want to engage in some speculation about the Bush administration's motivations for breaking the law.<br><br>The question presented:<br><br>It's important to note that it wasn't just Valerie Place who was outed by Novak. Plame's entire network was also outed when Novak named Brewster Jennings & Associates, a CIA front company, as the place she worked. The focus of Plame's CIA work was weapons of mass destruction. Her network was responsible for gathering information to help defend our nation against annihilation by such weapons.<br><br>WMD is the reason Bush took us to war with Iraq, the backbone of his foreign policy, the mantra more than 1800 of the USA's finest soldiers have met their death for. It is that term, "weapons of mass destruction" that might actually be the calling card of the grim reaper, shouold he come via court order for the men and women of the Bush crime family.<br><br>Don't buy into the mantra that Plame was outed only as a retaliation upon her husband, Joe Wilson. The Bush crime family wouldn't put their necks on the chopping block for Treason just to smear Wilson, especially in light of the fact that they knew Wilson's Niger report was accurate. The risk reward pay off is ridiculously insufficient.<br><br>The Bush cabal are not a stupid bunch. You can ridicule Bush, Cheney and the gang all you like, but they're running our country, making billions through Haliburton and the Carlisle group, getting away with torture in open view, and rewriting the Constitution while flipping the middle finger to the main stream media who take that finger, lick it and deposit it in their anatomy on a daily basis...with a smile on their faces.<br><br>The only logical reason the intelligent Bush administration would expose themselves to prosecution under the controlling laws of the United States Code by outing Valerie Plame, Brewster Jennings and the CIA, is that they probably had no other choice. It was either expose a major CIA operation to the public at large through co-conspirator, Robert Novak, or allow Plame's CIA division to complete their WMD investigations.<br><br>The Bush syndicate must have come to the conclusion that they had a better chance of spinning the outing of Plame to petty retaliation for Wilson's debunking of the Niger document fraud, than they had of surviving an investigation by the CIA of their crimes against the USA and humanity at large, the fixing of intelligence to support a preemptive war and possibly the facilitation of future black op patsies.<br><br>Until recently, the Bush spin machine has flawlessly controlled public attention by concentrating it, as to the law, on the insignificant Intelligence Identities Protection Act, and, as to their motivations, on the Wilson smear campaign. This has been easy spin as their gambit was centered in confidence that the media would play along.<br><br>What they could not spin, if the CIA was on to them, was mountains of evidence Plame and her network might have uncovered, evidence which may have been implicating the Bush syndicate in Treason.<br><br>Certainly, the State Department and the White House staff must have considered that outing a CIA agent of any level or status, covert or non covert, who was working on weapons of mass destruction, "in a time of war", might lead to that work being compromised and that such actions on their part might expose them to the provisions of 18 USC 793 and 794, among other laws.<br><br>And that is exactly what happened.<br><br><br>The rest is <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/" target="top">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> at http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/ An insightful and well-written legalese look at statutes, what they mean, how they're being twisted, and how they can possibly be used to the great disadvantage of Bushco (if they ever raise their heads again.) --MaryK <p></p><i></i>
marykmusic
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Central Arizona
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: But wait-- there's more...

Postby OnoI812 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:23 am

Yup - I posted that back about 20 posts ago...but it's important enough to repost ...so thanks<br><br><br>Maybe it should go in it's own thread so it doesn't keep getting lost.... I have a feeling this will be a revealing week ahead... <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

CLOAK:

Postby dbeach » Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:05 pm

Cloak News Flash:Aug.7/05:1:30AM<br><br>"Chicago Special Prosecutor's criminal indictment's drives Bush crazy. Bush prepares to replace Special Prosecutor with Bonesman schoolmate. Some in Military itching to act. Bush going down road like Nixon in "Saturday Night Massacre." <br><br>==============================================<br><br>Chicago -- August 7, 2005 -- Sunday morning online editions of Newsweek and Time are reporting that U.S. President George W. Bush is planning to get rid of Chicago's U.S. Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and replace him with a Bush classmate/Skull and Bonesman from Yale. Cloakanddagger.ca reported last week that Bush had attempted to assassinate Fitzgerald but that he was saved by Free French Forces.<br><br>Following on the heels of these reports, The Cloak has learned from U.S. intelligence sources that federal agents are prepared to immediately arrest Mr. Bush if he removes Fitzgerald and seeks to obstruct justice and commit additional treasonous acts regarding ongoing grand jury proceedings against this Administration and himself.<br><br>Cloakanddagger.ca Co-Host Sherman Skolnick reported last week that Fitzgerald's grand jury voted out perjury and obstruction of justice "True Bills" or federal criminal indictments against President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, former CIA Director George Tenet, Presidential Senior Advisor Karl Rove, Presidential Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Vice-Presidential Chief of Staff I. "Scooter" Libby, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and Vice-Presidential Senior Advisor Mary Matalin.<br><br>On Friday, Tom Heneghen reported on Cloak's Shop Talk From Plot H.Q. that the true bills also listed Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Antonin Scalia as unindicted co-conspirators.<br><br>According to sources close to the grand jury, Fitzgerald's citizen panel is now able to prove that George W. Bush was not legitimately elected president in the 2000 election; but more importantly, it has fingered the United States Supreme Court for fraud, obstruction of justice and treason, making the Bush terms totally illegal.<br><br>The scope of the indictments and investigations indicates that the grand jury's indicted criminal acts reaching back to 2000 will lead to further legitimate assumptions that Bush-Cheney involvement in the 9.11 attacks and sending American young people to war based upon lies orchestrated by Mr. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair are both squarely in the sights of the grand jury."<br><br>wILL CLOAK EVER ESTABLISH ANY CREDIBILITY??<br><br>Story is twisting<br><br>I think Fitzies boss is being replaced by Mccollom who is another insider from the 600 frat that runs the USA and threatens to destroy us all[S&B}<br><br>AGAIN its do the twist..<br>shake it up baby and jump and shout..<br><br>limbo 'how low can u go?"<br><br>stroll <br><br>ect...<br><br>its a deadly rock and roll party<br><br>ROCK ON!<br> <br><br> <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: CLOAK:

Postby Dreams End » Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:28 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Sunday morning online editions of Newsweek and Time are reporting that U.S. President George W. Bush is planning to get rid of Chicago's U.S. Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and replace him with a Bush classmate/Skull and Bonesman from Yale. Cloakanddagger.ca reported last week that Bush had attempted to assassinate Fitzgerald but that he was saved by Free French Forces.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I can't think what the motive is, but I see this a lot. There's a kernel of a true story there but then heaps of extras that never come to pass get added on (well, we'll wait and see, but clearly, even after the Newsweek article has been posted, these "investigators" are still saying its Fitzgerald and not his boss that's getting replaced.)<br><br>If indictments to all these higher ups don't come to pass, as I expect they won't, I wonder why this pattern so often repeats. It's not to discredit the various investigators...they seem willing to do that to themselves. To discredit future attempts to make those added connections?<br><br>Or maybe these stories are true...but I imagine it is harder to indict a Supreme Court Justice (who'll be dead very soon) than it is even to indict the president. Anyway...why do they keep publishing that Newsweek says Fitzgerald is getting sacked? AM I wrong to trust others on this site who've read the newsweek article that it says no such thing?<br><br>And "Free French Forces?" I'll stick to my commitment not to accuse anyone of intentional disinfo...but people really should try to make it harder to make that accusation. <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

Re: CLOAK:

Postby dbeach » Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:36 pm

we all learning the hard core way...<br><br>"TRUTH is the first casualty in war"<br><br>and the spin and sin goes on...<br><br>watch for patterns is great observation <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: But wait-- there's more...

Postby OnoI812 » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:08 am

check out this interesting comment:<br><br>Truth Diamond said... <br>"Most recently, we have assembled reports that<br>plutonium has been delivered to the Mossad<br>at the Port of Amsterdam that was stolen by the<br>Russian Mafia from former Soviet nuclear stockpiles<br>in the Ural Mountains. Along these lines, we also learned<br>of a detailed report, prepared at Maxwell AFB, which<br>completely supports Ambassador Wilson´s assessment<br>of the Niger documents: the uranium did NOT go to Iraq,<br>but to Israel´s nuclear reactor at Dimona, in the Negev desert:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/thomas/pluto.txt">www.supremelaw.org/author.../pluto.txt</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(see also discussion of Amsterdam´s Schipol Airport)<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/farr/farr.htm">www.supremelaw.org/authors/farr/farr.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(search for "yellow cake")<br><br>Therefore, the Weapons of Mass Destruction are in Israel,<br>not in Iraq. And, we suspect that low-yield micro nuclear<br>weapons are being smuggled from there into the USA,<br>for purposes of political blackmail.<br><br>If something falls directly under their jurisdiction,<br>I also inform the duty officer assigned to me at<br>the U.S. Marshals in downtown San Diego.<br><br>The U.S. Marshals recently intercepted an<br>attempt to detonate explosives in the Chicago<br>subway, and they killed 4 suspects in that shootout;<br>the others were arrested and are now in custody.<br><br>We believe those bombs were intended to<br>disrupt Fitzgerald´s grand jury investigation.<br><br>I do not communicate directly with Fitzgerald,<br>but I am on Sherman Skolnick´s email list,<br>and we have already received reports that<br>Skolnick confirms the INDICTMENT.<br><br>Skolnick knows a lot of people in Chicago,<br>so he would be your primary source for confirmation,<br>one way or the other.<br><br>The alleged INDICTMENT is certainly warranted, imho.<br><br>We have already notified Alberto Gonzales that he too is<br>under formal investigation -- on suspicion of child abuse<br>in connection with the torture at prison Abu Ghraib:<br>Seymour Hersh has seen photographic evidence of children<br>being tortured there. Congress has custody of the photos<br>at the present time.<br><br>As a matter of law, lying to Congress about the<br>Niger "yellow cake" is a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001,<br>to say nothing of all the treason and racketeering felonies<br>that were committed during the preparation and execution of 9/11.<br><br>The motive for outing Plame appears to be complex, involving<br>also a desire to prevent any interruptions in the smuggling of<br>plutonium<br>to the Mossad from the Russian Mafia. We think Plame´s assignment<br>was to track fissionable materials in the black market for same."<br><br><br>Sincerely yours,<br>/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<br>Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and<br>Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm">www.supremelaw.org/decs/a...eneral.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm">www.supremelaw.org/index.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm">www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm">www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:23:03 EDT<br>Subject: Re: [coyotehunters] Re: Tom Flocco<br>groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition/message/3134<br><br>In a message dated 8/4/2005 12:33:45 AM Central Standard Time,<br>freesia2@... writes:<br>Carole & group: I am suspicious that there has been a "convenient"<br>glitch<br>(or worse), as Tom Flocco's site was up yesterday. He had sent me the<br>info on<br>the Bush/Cheney indictment before Marci posted it. In the e-mail, if<br>you<br>wanted to read the whole article, you had to click on "Read more,"<br>which I did.<br>It took me to his website, where I read the whole article. Now the<br>Still not up. There is a page up now that is showing a brief note and<br>saying<br>check with "whitestar website design.com".................. Being the<br>obedient<br>female, I did, got the phone number and called. A gentleman named BOB<br>answered.<br>Thru my few ignorant questions, I derived that it the site for Tom is<br>not<br>voluntarily down, the Man said his server has been under attack since<br>Monday<br>over the indictment article (in so many words) Stated his personal<br>computer has<br>been hacked into also. They have been working on it 24/7 since it went<br>down. Bob<br>owns this server and quite a few more of the political sites. Says he<br>knows who<br>it is doing it but can't say. Now again some one remind me where we<br>live? Land<br>of the free?<br><br>Carole (Texas Proud)<br><br><br>here- <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/2005/08/treasongate-white-house-indicted-us.html">citizenspook.blogspot.com...ed-us.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>+ there was another one further down that said Flocco was on WLW at 10:00pm eastern tonight....anyone catch that? <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Re: Heneghan confronted

Postby Culhavoc » Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:07 pm

Hey guys,<br><br>There is no doubt this has become a hot topic. This post is a response to questions posed by OnoI812.<br><br>OnoI812, you are correct that Heneghan did not appear on Cloak and Dagger 8/2, he appeared later on truthradio.com. (correction noted on blog)<br>Good catch, you are obviously paying attention.<br><br>While I was writing I was using notes that contained the text posted at cloakanddagger.ca and saw "REGULAR GUEST TOM HENEGHAN", but failed to see the preceding "DOCUMENTS FURNISHED...BY" text.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Cloak and Dagger<br>RADIO-NEWS Bulletin<br>1:53 EDT August 2ND<br><br>CHICAGO GRAND JURY FINGERS<br>PRESIDENT BUSH & VICE-PRESIDENT CHENEY.<br>BUSH & CHENEY INDICTED!<br>CLICK TO HEAR<br><br>DOCUMENTS FURNISHED TO <br>THE CHICAGO GRAND JURY<br>BY<br>CLOAK AND DAGGER<br>REGULAR GUEST<br>TOM HENEGHEN<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>I agree this was sloppy, however I did not intend to purposely mislead.<br><br><br><br>In your post you added:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"...He also leaves out the fact that Heneghan first broached the subject on the 18th, when it would have been impossible for Henghan to know unless he was somehow involved or in some way being briefed very shortly after the events took place."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I was unaware of the Heneghan, Webb et al reporting on this subject on the 18th, my article begins with the story Webb published on the 19th, however this challenges no aspect of my argument. Did this broadcast take place before 4:52PM CST? This is when the CTA Red Line was rerouted. If not, why would it be impossible for Heneghan to know the Red Line was shutting down lines? <br><br>The Cloak crew were making related claims as early as July 9th, 2005<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>(Cloak & Dagger News_7 _9_05: Chicago)<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>WILL CHICAGO SPECIAL FEDERAL PROSECUTOR FITZGERALD GET WHACK ED BY BUSH?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>In the CIA leak case Special Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is about to release Criminal Indictments against George W. Bush. Result? White House threatens to assassinate Fitzgerald.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I am speculating that the Red Line rerouting was just the event they needed to tie into their story.<br><br><br>OnoI812, you also added: <br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"Culhavoc has no transcripts, links or mp3's for the 18th and 19th when TH first broached the subway story on truthradio."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Again, I was unaware of these broadcasts, however since my article is an inquiry into whether or not the Heneghan/Webb July 19th "press release" is based in fact, this fails to challenge any of my arguments. Furthermore, It is not my responsibility to provide transcripts for every Heneghan/Webb et al appearance. <br><br>The burden of proof is not on me.<br><br>I would like to add that if anyone can provide me with these shows, I would be more than happy to review them and add any information to my site that would either prove or disprove the MI6/CTA allegations in question.<br><br>Being a native Chicagoan, this story hits home for me. I did not set out to "debunk" these allegations, I made an honest attempt to confirm them by any means neccessary, but found nothing. I have posed several questions, none of which have been answered.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Which CTA station?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>You claim the foiled bombing occurred in the Red Line station, are you sure you’re not referring to the Jackson Blue Line which is the station located below the Dirksen?<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>CTA transfer card</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Can you tell us the expiration time on the transfer card?<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Your initial 6:33 time allegation</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Why have you dropped this item from your reporting?<br>Why has the July 24th edition of "Cloak & Dagger", during which you state the event occured at 6:33 PM CST, been removed from cloakanddagger.de?<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>What happened to the Laidlaw connection?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>In your initial article on this subject you made the following claim:<br><br>"The British MI-6 Terrorist Cell Operated out of Laidlaw Corp in Chicago"<br><br>This is yet another very specific allegation that has been dropped from your reporting. <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://culhavoc.blogsome.com/2005/08/06/more-unsubstantiated-mi6cta-claims/">culhavoc.blogsome.com/200...ta-claims/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>OnoI812, I appreciate your questioning my inquiry and welcome any additional criticism you or anyone else may have.<br><br>I, unlike TH/SW/SS/TF, return emails.<br><br><br>Regards,<br><br><br>Culhavoc@yahoo.com<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>culhavoc.blogsome.com</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><br><br>(8/9) edited for grammar, although grammatical's most likely remain.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=culhavoc>Culhavoc</A> at: 8/9/05 7:53 pm<br></i>
Culhavoc
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to Plame Investigation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests