rigorousintuition.ca

But this is so weird to me.<br><br>"We can now report, however, that we have additional, independent sources that refute those denials by Corallo and Luskin. While we had only our own sources to work with in the beginning, additional sources have now come forward and offered corroboration to us.<br><br>We have been contacted by at least three reporters from mainstream media - network level organizations - who shared with us off-the-record confirmation and moral support. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>When we asked why they were not going public with this information, in each case they expressed frustration with superiors who would not allow it.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->"<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://" target="top"> http://forum.truthout.org/blog/story/20 ... 125248/0... </a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1217129" target="top">www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1217129</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br> <p></p><i></i>

veery interesting. see if rove is announced as indicted bush's polls will tank. <br><br>this isn't too wierd because CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN and FOX are all owned and operated by the big ol bad guys. instead all they can comment on is rove's supposed cheerfulness. to keep the tension up. i hope it breaks soon. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

typical.<br><br><br>The information will have to come out eventually though....right? If Karl Rove is being indicted, how could they keep it hush hush for too long? <p></p><i></i>

a small update from wayne madsen:<br><br>May 19th: "Now Rove faces his "Segretti moment" in the CIA Leakgate affair. Washington, DC has been abuzz with rumors and story planting for years in this case. Rove learned well from his mentor Segretti. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>This morning, DC anxiously awaits a press advisory from the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) regarding a major development in the Rove case. If past is prologue, a press advisory will be issued mid morning about an afternoon press conference.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> We are standing by."<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/" target="top">www.waynemadsenreport.com/</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/19/06 9:00 am<br></i>

Maybe they're saving the story for the "weekend". <p></p><i></i>

I suggested about a year ago the case itself is a psy-op. Considering every other thread in places like DU are about 'fitzmas' or some stupid speculational nonsense, I'd have to attest to it's effectiveness.<br><br>As long as everyone <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>thinks</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> someone's going down soon, most won't act on their own. <p></p><i></i>

I've been checking around the Internet looking for more info.<br><br>One site theorizes that Rove has accepted a plea bargain in return for fingering Cheney and that's why no news yet.<br><br>But the silence is wierd, isn't it?<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>

Go Here:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.google.com/alerts?hl=en&q=google+alerts">www.google.com/alerts?hl=...gle+alerts</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Look at box that says: "Create a Google Alert"<br>Fill in desired info: "Karl Rove", "Gen. Hayden", etc. <br>You'll get e-mails either "once a day" or "as it happens" depending on your choice. <p></p><i></i>

heh heh<br><br>I'll get one copy and 'Homeland Security' will get the cc, eh?<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>

Here's GoogleNews homepage:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://news.google.com/news?ned=tus">news.google.com/news?ned=tus</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>and yeah, I know it's mainstream but they source a lot of "foreign" news orgs.--BBC, Observer, China Daily, Bloomberg, Sydney Morning Herald, Asia Times, International Herald Tribune, etc. <p></p><i></i>

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://forum.truthout.org/blog/story/2006/5/19/162339/178" target="top">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>we erred in getting too far out in front of the news-cycle<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Whatever that means. <p></p><i></i>

To add my bit of speculation to the mix: I suspect that either a cat and mouse game of plea bargaining is still going on, or Fitzgerald's investigation is about to wrap up and tie all loose ends, and he is waiting until that moment to make an annoucnement of multiple indictments, including perhaps Cheney, and a recommendation to the House of impeaching Bush. This latter may admittedly be a bit wishful-thinking. <p></p><i></i>

Since the partial apology is rather short, I thought I'd just post it here and save people the trip. If you want to read the comments, some of which are interesting, see the link a few posts above. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Rove Indictment Story as of Right Now<br>By Marc Ash,<br>Fri May 19th, 2006 at 04:23:39 PM EDT :: Fitzgerald Investigation<br><br>On Saturday afternoon, May 13, 2006, TruthOut ran a story titled, "Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators." The story stated in part that top Bush aide Karl Rove had earlier that day been indicted on the charges set forth in the story's title.<br><br>The time has now come, however, to issue a partial apology to our readership for this story. While we paid very careful attention to the sourcing on this story, we erred in getting too far out in front of the news-cycle. In moving as quickly as we did, we caused more confusion than clarity. And that was a disservice to our readership and we regret it.<br><br>As such, we will be taking the wait-and-see approach for the time being. We will keep you posted. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>This "apology" admits only two vague things. <br>They "erred in getting too far in front of the news-cycle" and they "caused more confusion than clarity." <br><br>Quite mysterious. My speculation would be the comments refer either to the fact an indictment was submitted to the Grand Jury by Fitzgerald, but Rove has not actually yet been indicted by the Grand Jury OR for some other reason Truthout has been burned for spilling some of the beans prematurely. <p></p><i></i>

How many of you folks are already aware of this Patrick Fitzgerald blog website? <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://patrickjfitzgerald.blogspot.com/">patrickjfitzgerald.blogspot.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>It is quite amusing and perhaps a little illuminating beyond what the other news-oriented websites like Truthout, Raw Story, or WMR provide. <p></p><i></i>