by firstimer » Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:08 am
I have problems with the "double bullet theory" to many articles omit the back of the head detail. They also say that they couldn't tell if he bled to death, or died instantly. That is an outright lie, (pathologist in the family) Even a seasoned detective can intuit that from the blood patterns. The notes could be produced from samples, which I'm sure there were alot of. The CIA had 10 years to plan this, If they could blacklist him from press jobs, (his own kind, or not) putting together a plausible suicide would be a cinch. Follow the guy that gave him a lift, if anything looks suspicious, that does. Its constantly referred to as the "last straw" Every suicide story has to have a simplistic, non personal, trigger so that others can relate without hesitation. A mother-in-law calling and opening up a can of worms over an old argument with your wife wouldn't sell the suicide as elegantly, but that is often the more likely trigger, the one that connects to your past. Not some arbitrary ripoff. How easy is it to setup a breakdown, and a rescue, to frame as a suicide. This setup started with the blacklist as far as I'm concerned and possibly ended with his stopping of his antidepressant course. Easilly conjured by unemployment, and a fantastic cover to throw off liberals that hate the pharms. Suck them into that cause, and they won't look back at the double bullet theory ever again. Just like Jackie did, Susan tows the line.<br><br>firstimer<br> <p></p><i></i>
