Di death driver paid $180,000

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:13 am

London 14jun05 THE chauffeur who crashed the car in which Princess Diana died received almost $180,000 in the weeks leading up to the accident. The mystery payments to Henri Paul, who also died in the 1997 Paris tunnel car crash, dwarfed his annual $47,000 salary as a driver. The payments -- mostly from British banks -- were discovered by auditors assisting the UK investigation into Diana's death. The revelations will fuel conspiracy theories that Mr Paul was being paid by British spymasters -- an allegation first raised by an ex-MI6 agent shortly after the crash. Mr Paul was already known to have built up a small fortune in a global network of 13 separate bank accounts. This was despite his modest salary as a driver at the Ritz, owned by Mohamed Al Fayed, retail tycoon and father of Diana's boyfriend, Dodi, who died with her. The new findings are the first evidence Mr Paul received payments directly from Britain. "The money arrived via a banker's draft and was converted into French francs from sterling," a source "close to the investigation" told Britain's Daily Express. ... Claims that Mr Paul was in the pay of British spymasters were first raised by renegade former MI6 spy Richard Tomlinson, who said the French driver was paid for supplying Britain's intelligence service with gossip about Ritz guests. <a href="http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,15607888%255E663,00.html" target="top">www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,15607888%255E663,00.html</a>

by **slimmouse** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:45 pm

I watched a late afternoon TV "magazine" show yesterday which addressed this. A few points about what I heard struck me as interesting. Things I had been hithero unaware of. Firstly, that numerous eyewitnesses all testified to seeing a flash of light prior to the crash , which was "definitely NOT a photo flash". This would tend to corroborate some way with the Richard Tomlinson testimony link I posted a lil while back - namely, that amongst other possible ( combined ) sabotage of the driver, a strobe light was used. Strangely enough of course, all the 17 surveillance cameras along the route she was taking werent of course working at the time ! Secondly, the question of motive was mentioned. Amongst the key factors considered, were; A) that she may well have been pregnant, and was, furthermore considering becoming muslim. b) She would have detracted much focus away from the royal family - a rival, and possibly more popular royalty - The peoples Princess - as was her favoured title amongst the masses. c) Having already made significant impact in the landmine campaign, get this. She apparently had plans to become some kind of major player in the movement against oppressed and abused children. Furthermore, the first place she intended to focus this particular part of the campaign ( the oppression of children) was in Palestine. One can imagine the kind of impact this would have had,Backed by the both the kind of mass support she found amongst the British public, and indeed throughout the rest of the world, and by the enormous wealth of her Father in law to be ( Mohammed Al fayed - Owner of amongst other things - Harrods) At this point it started to make even more sense ! I should stress by the way, that Mossad werent implicated lol. But more because it fits smugly with my perception of the entire purpose of Israel - namely a White colonial outpost - A Rothschild/ Royal bloodlines rogue state in a resource rich region, rather than anything to do with Judaism or any of the rest of it. But one of the most enlightening things about this section of the programme, was that one of the guests was the current partner of David Shayler - The MI5 whistleblower. She herself worked in MI5 prior to that episode. She was asked when she first considered the possibility that Diana had been murdered. She said , that her and David hadnt given the episode too much thought initially - which as she also said would have been more than understandable since at that time, her and her partner ( Shayler) were all to busy trying to keep one step ahead of British intelligence as they flitted around France attempting to elude capture. But she said, that both their ears pricked up when the story broke about Mohammed Al Fayed being offered so called "documentary proof" of an intercept between the CIA and MI6. Not when this was first revealed of course, - but rather later as everyone discovered the document was a fake ! She said that they both suddenly began to take the whole murder theory seriously, because the whole episode with the fake documents was so classically counterprointel <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"> Finally on a slightly depressing note, according to the programmes presenters, it is claimed that roughly 94% of the British public believe that Diana was murdered. If people can be so indifferent to what they percieve to be the murder of one of their "favourite daughters" , what is it gonna take for people to truly wake the fuck up to anything else ? <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes">

by **smiths** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:26 am

not only was there a reported white flash but i read that mi6 had tried to use the exact same method about 5 years before that to kill slobodan milosevic, but no links to that sorry

by **smiths** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:28 am

theres plenty there but here is one link <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1343">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/...sp?ID=1343</a>

by **antiaristo** » Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:30 pm

Slimmouse, The British people ARE awake. They know there is a ton of evidence that in aggregate proves she was murdered. The post by RI is more such That is why 94 percent believe as they do. Now as to why nothing happens, that is another question….

by **antiaristo** » Sat Jun 18, 2005 5:24 pm

"One of Prince Charles' key men is the Canadian Maurice Strong." <a href="http://www.clydelewis.com/dis/prince/prince.html">www.clydelewis.com/dis/pr...rince.html</a>

by **emad** » Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:08 pm

After seven and a half years there has still been no INQUEST into this sordid matter. Too many of the House of Windsor's secrets are tied up in this pathetic tragedy. "Princess Diana" was a composite character played by a total of three different individuals recruited by Thatcher and Reagan/Bush1 during the cold war years to enact their pathetic version of public life in Britain and whitewash over the civil war that has raged there since the time of the Suez crisis of 1957. The hapless young woman who died on 31 August 1997 in Paris was the daugther of former MI5 spook chief Stella Riminington. "Prince William and Prince Harry" were both murdered when the were very young and replaced with more grim Thatcher-spawned lookalikes. "William" is the son of Heather Mills (wife of Paul McCartney) and Andrew Morton (author of a book on Princess Di). "Harry" is the son of Tory MP John Redwwod and an illegitimate daughter of Blair's Middle East envoy (& chief Iraq WMD proponent) /erstwhile tennis partner Lord Levy - in reality a Russian born member of the notorious Freeman crime family. "Princess Diana" was blackmailing both the UK and US governments for massive $$$$$$$$ settlements in exchange for keeping quiet about what she knew of this cosy Windsor set up brokered by Thatcher and Reagan/Bush1. The "Dodi Fayed" biz was nothing but a summer fling to hide the affair she had had with Pakistani doctor Hasnat Khan who had been the subect of an intense MI6 operation investigating the trafficking of nuclear weapons and materiel in Asia and the Far East.

by **anon** » Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:10 pm

what? seriously, does anyone think the rabbit hole is THAT deep? just asking

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:45 pm

This is the second thread my friend emad has poisoned. The first was about BCCI. The only thing you need to know about is the Treason Felony Act 1848. Then all the pieces fall into place. I’ll reproduce the law below. Do not be fooled by the archaic language. This law is in force every bit as much as legislation passed last year. The point is, this law has no meaning UNLESS there is a queen on the throne. So long as Diana was alive Charles was not free to marry. So she was murdered, either by him or on his behalf. 3. Offences herein mentioned declared to be felonies ...If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or to deprive or depose our Most Gracious Lady the Queen, ...from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom, or of any other of her Majesty's dominions and countries, or to levy war against her Majesty, ...within any part of the United Kingdom, in order by force or constraint to compel her... to change her... measures of counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon her or in order to intimidate or overawe both Houses or either House of Parliament, or to move or stir any foreigner or stranger with force to invade the United Kingdom or any other of her Majesty's dominions or countries under the obeisance of her Majesty... and such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions, or any of them, shall express, utter, or declare, by publishing any printing or writing, ...or by any overt act or deed, every person so offending shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, ...to be transported beyond the seas for the term of his or her natural life. What's so important about this law? It is illegal to oppose anything she wants in any way! Whether it is the assassination of her daughter in law, keeping open BCCI and covering up, or invading Iraq. This law is what forced the change in the Attorney General's advice on the legality.

by **emad** » Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:22 am

Hi antiaristo. May I mention once again that everything concerning the principal characters in the House of Windsor AFTER the Luftwaffe's bombing of a wing on Buckingham Palace in September 1940 is PURE CRAP. Winston Churchill, as PM of the Tory-led coalition wartime government put in counter-intelligence operation that was supposed to be a temporary measure while he and Roosevelt figured out just what the hell to do. This is what actually happened and which is still the subjecy of the most draconian, retrubutive Brit measures ever imposed on anyone via the UK Official Secrets Act: George VI, his wife Elizabeth Bowes Lyons and their eldest daughter Princess Elizabeth did NOT SURVIVE the bombing. Princess Margaret did. The Tories panicked and decided to put in a counter-measure involving using actors who had previously stood in as lookalikes on security ops involving Royal tours. They had a woman called Violet King Freeman - second or possibly third wife of the Russian-born UK wirter Richard Freeman (who wrote under the pen name of Edgar Wallace, works including the film script of King Kong) - to play the role of Queen Elizabeth. A lookalike from Viscount Aldington's family called Temple was put in to play the role of George VI. And a daughter of Richard Freeman born to a 12 year old Russian prostitute called Xenia Sergeyev - named as Barbara Freeman on her birth certificate - was inserted into the role of "Princess Elizabeth". The rest is history. Long, complex and lethal. Suffice to say that the current "Queen Elizabeth II" is still in situ despite being Barbara Freeman. None of her official kids is in any way royal. "Princess Diana" signed a huge pre-nuptual agreement before her wedding which attested to all the above and spelt out her options. The chicanery of this farcical plot was the masterplan of Archbishop Cosmo Lang, Oswald Moseley and Earl Mountbatten of Burma. The full story with all the back-up documents from reltaed press cuttings is abut to be pulished on the net in the very near future under the title of Who's Who in World Corruption (Cold War Edition and follow-up edition).

by **emad** » Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:06 pm

CORRECTION: "Prince William" is not Andrew Morton's son by Heather Mills but Alex Gelli's son. Gelli is a self re-invented London based restaurateur who in the last 20 years has been protected by a fake ID which ex-MI5 head Stela Rimington concocted for him. He has an extensive criminal record as a child sex offender and worked for many years for Vladimir Putin as a KGB hired assassin under the control of the late Robert Maxwell. He has been involved in fraud, corruption, embezzlement, racketeering and drug related felonies in the UK and Europe. His mother still works for 'Prince Charles's' charity and has been personally involved in the execution and subsequent cover-up of a UK property fraud directly related to the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano in 1982. Alex Gelli's father enry Gelli is a Cuban-born Russian who was hired by Andropov after the Cuban missile debacle of 1962. Although facing capital charges for the rape and murder of a 12 year old girl in Havana, he was smuggled out of the island after a dodgy plea bargain with US military interrogators who were investigating the corruption trail in US and UK military intelligence that was seminal to the Soviet build up. Henry Gelli provided credible information about former fascist and Nazi sympathisers in the UK's Mnistry of Defence who covered up UK intelligence sources about the Cuba biz. In the UK this trail eventually led to the downfall of War Minister Jack Profumo and the criminal trial of Mandy Rice Davis, a call girl whose clients apart from Profumo included the Soviet Minitary Attache in London. Henry Gelli has had an ignominous criminal career for the last 40 odd years culminating in Blair's June 2000 hostage taking of the head of UN Military Intelligence who had testified in late 1999 before a NATO tribunal about senior US and UK politicians, spooks, cops and bankers involved in the recruitment of "Al Qaeda". As I understand it, the money trail of this financing initially originated in BCCI-controlled accounts in the Carribean that were hastily siphoned off in early 1990 into new conduits associated with the banking giant HSBC. Diana's "Pre-Nuptual Agreement": One signatory to the legal agreement that the first actress who played "Lady Di" signed was John Major. After the August 1997 Paris car crash which killed the last "Princess Di", Major assumed the role of LEGAL GUARDIAN of "Prince William" and "Prince Harry". The Pre Nup documentation is held in a secure military establishment in the UK outside of the aegis of Tony Blair. The facility also holds all the forensic evidence related to Charles/Diana/William/Harry.

by **emad** » Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:14 pm

William to work in City By Robert Jobson, Royal Correspondent, Evening Standard 23 June 2005 Prince William is to work in the City after graduating from university today. He is to join a leading financial institution which specialises in international finance and commerce. The 23-year-old is the first future king to enter the world of big business and shows a more modern approach by the monarchy. Talking about the move, William said: "The work experience in the City was something I was particularly keen to do as I feel that this is an area in which I could learn a lot, and it may well help me with charitable fundraising in the future." And although the prince said he was not necessarily committed to a future City career, it was an experience he was "very much looking forward to". The news was announced today as he graduated from the University of St Andrews with a 2:1 Masters degree in geography. Prince William's girlfriend, Kate Middleton, a history of arts student, also graduated in the same ceremony. Clarence House said the prince would be undertaking a series of work experience placements in Britain this autumn. They said he wants to gain experience of a number of professions. But, intriguingly, he has left open the possibility of following his brother Harry into the armed forces. A palace statement said: "The prince is also continuing to consider actively joining the armed forces. He recently passed preliminary examinations which would allow him to apply for Army officer training at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, if he wishes to do so." William's work experience placements will include: Spending time with a financial institution in London gaining an insight into international finance and commerce; Learning about land management on a country estate; Helping with a mountain rescue team. William, whose graduation was watched by the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles and Camilla, said today: "I very much hope that these work placements will give me handson experience in three very different but important areas." He added: "Today is a very special day for me and I am delighted that I can share it with my family, and in particular with my grandmother, who has made such an effort to come, having been under the weather." It had been feared the Queen would miss the occasion after falling ill and being forced to scrap engagements, but she resumed them yesterday. Of his time at St Andrews, the prince said: "I shall be very sad to leave ... I have been able to lead as normal a student life as I could have hoped for and I am very grateful to everyone, particularly the locals, who have helped to make this happen." William added: "I am very much looking forward to the challenges and opportunities which the future brings - and not least, hopefully, an ultimately triumphant Lions tour of New Zealand." William and a group of about 34 geography students were among 260 people graduating in the morning ceremony, which was watched by nearly 800 guests. The prince, who celebrated his birthday on Tuesday, donned a black silk graduation-robe with a cherry silk lining - signifying he is now a Master of Arts (MA), the standard first degree in arts faculties in Scotland's four "ancient" universities. After the ceremony, William, with his father and stepmother, the Duchess of Rothesay, was due to make a private visit to the local police station, where the prince said he wanted "to thank Fife Constabulary for the constant support which they have given me". Next week, William flies to New Zealand to watch the British Lions tour. <a href="http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/19492476?source=Evening%20Standard&ct=5">www.thisislondon.com/news...ndard&ct=5</a> LOOKS like another BCCI/Banco Ambrosiano looming.....

by **Connut** » Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:09 pm

Does anyone remember seeing a newsphoto of Charles and Camilla, standing on the steps of the same Paris hotel that Di left from, before her murder? The light of the "flash" camera is stark, and it was suggested that it was a strobe light like the one in the tunnel, and was a reminder to Charles and Co to toe the line and remember "who's your daddy?" For myself, having grown up in England, nobody but the interbreeding royals could produce ears like Charles' - talk about a taxi with the doors open ...

by **emad** » Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:13 am

The first Charles was executed in the UK by renegade MoD spooks who inserted one Michael Gelli - a lookalike who is the son of "Raine Spencer", former stepmother of Lady Di.

Di death driver paid $180,000

Di death driver paid $180,000

94% think Diana was murdered.

flash

link

The Brits

This should catch your attention, Jeff

Dead Di's driver

emad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Disinformation

house of windsor disinformation

Dead Di's driver: addendum/correction

William to work in City

Back to Di's Driver

"Charles"

Who is online