by professorpan » Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:03 am
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>No sarcasm. Those bonobos have more humanity than the Congolese who eat them. What's happening to the bonobos is a crime against humanity that deserves international military intervention. It's not just any ordinary genocide against defenseless hominids, they're being eaten. I'd gladly sign up to fight the inhuman monsters committing that atrocity.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Of course, there are ways to stop the Congolese from eating bonobos that don't require large scale slaughter of the humans -- education, better protected habitats, law enforcement, and other non-violent solutions. Nonviolent solutions are always my default. <br><br>I do get a kick out of militant vegetarians who espouse violence against people :-)<br><br>I say that as a pescovegetarian (I eat fish and shellfish). I don't draw ethical lines as sharply as some, though I can't imagine eating a cow, a pig, a chicken, or any other mammal. But I do understand biology and the difference between species. I live with a fair amount of guilt over partaking of fish, but it's hypocrisy I can tolerate.<br><br>The spectrum of compassion is different for all people. I've assisted many people in transitioning to a more compassionate, sustainable diet, but adversarial confrontations and diatribes are always counterproductive. <p></p><i></i>