Crap..here we go again..

[nomo]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>If the weather people were in on it, they would have edited out the artifacts.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>So maybe they did? I don't see any "arcs" in the original posts link:<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/marti/2006_ONE/webManager/last24hrs.gif"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>

[professorpan]

I'd like to hear what radar analysts have to say about that anomaly. It might be something very common, and explainable as something other than weather manipulation.<br><br>I can't find anything via a cursory search. Anyone have contacts or links to weather radar resources? <p></p><i></i>

[Et in Arcadia ego]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>So maybe they did? I don't see any "arcs" in the original posts link:<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>The reason you don't is because the timeline has gone beyond the occurance. Right click on the image you posted, select 'save as', and you''ll see the file's name is 'last 24 hours'.<br><br>I saved the time frame that contains the artifact, but it's not accessable on this machine. <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>If not, wouldn't they ask where they were coming from, or why they seemed to correspond with shifts in the storm? I'd probably edit it out anyway...<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>Not if they couldn't handle the cognitive dissonance and as scientists had reflexively ruled out anything too weird as an explanation. That could be a natural response and could be the real cause behind a lot of "gatekeeping" attitudes. <p></p><i></i>

[*]

<br> <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"If not, wouldn't they ask where they were coming from, or why they seemed to correspond with shifts in the storm? I'd probably edit it out anyway..."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br> Nine out of ten people believe, unquestioningly, what they are told by 'experts'. the tenth is, by definition, a quack; crank; nut job; CT; tin-foil-hatter; crazy; delusional etc., etc.....<br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[Et in Arcadia ego]

Well said, Fourthbase.. <p></p><i></i>