Page 1 of 1

Mother Nature Strikes Back?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:19 pm
by Connut
Maybe the piddlings and fiddlings of the BFEE won't matter very much if Stan Deyo's latest prediction pans out like his others. Did anyone else see the report of the collapse of the resurgent dome at Mount St. Helen's on Monday? Well, we always knew earth events aren't that important to Georgy. Take a look at this site and see what you think.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.standeyo.com/index1.html">www.standeyo.com/index1.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Correction

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 6:27 pm
by Connut
The collapse of the dome was actually on July 29th, with a 3.3 earthquake. Apparently the potential of earthquakes and large tidal waves within the next four days is pretty high. Hey, dbeach and you guys on the west coast, watch out!<br><br>Quote:<br><br>August 2, 2005<br>By Stan Deyo<br>Home <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://standeyo.com">standeyo.com</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>This RED ALERT is the first of its kind I've ever made in the 9 years of studying seismic event indicators. It is so huge that I almost can't believe my eyes. The importance and severity of this has impressed me more significantly than when I predicted and warned about the coming December 26, 2004 Indonesian events beginning December 22. <br><br>For the last 6 days, I've seen indications of a large number of earthquake pressures building across a 2,000-mile long arc in the North Pacific. At first, I thought these indications were a result of large storms so I disregarded them. Until this afternoon when a listener (thanks Dan) heard my radio broadcast and emailed information to me, I wasn't able to explain the cause of this discovery.....<br><br>HOWEVER, since I have never seen an event of this size in the making, I don't know if it will back off and come back again several times before releasing. All I am sure of is that it's a unique event in my 9 years of monitoring these seismic indicators......<br><br>It has the potential to produce enormous tidal waves throughout the Pacific Basi(n).<br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Correction

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 6:59 pm
by ZeroHaven
Awe crap! So they're testing the nukes under water?<br>[secures Velostat hat firmly] <p><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a239/ZeroHaven/tinhat.gif"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--></p><i></i>

All kinds of ways...

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:55 am
by marykmusic
...for Mother Nature to strike back.<br><br>The sandstorm and heavy wind preceding Tuesday evening's thunderstorm here in the Southern Arizona desert nearly took our roof off (a couple of neighbors have lost theirs due to storms of this severity over the last year.) Sure, it's the monsoon season here, but the intensity is increasing. That changed from the severe heat a couple of weeks ago that killed numerous homeless people in Phoenix.<br><br>We don't need to talk about the hurricanes.<br><br>Last year, we were all hyped up about the super-volcano at Yellowstone.<br><br>I lived through the continuous ashfall from Mt St Helens in 1980; wouldn't wish that to happen again.<br><br>ENN (Environmental News Network) is running a story connecting the increased severity of various meteorological events on the global warming; I believe that the mind-set of the masses is at least equally responsible for extreme events. The power of the mind, and especially mass consciousness, is potent.<br><br>We are what we think. Be careful what you dwell on. --MaryK <p></p><i></i>

reality check

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:42 am
by Avalon
Perhaps it would be good to rule out basic physics as being the cause of what is happening or building up to happen, before blaming nature spirits and bad thoughts?<br> <p></p><i></i>