Catholic church starts its war on birth contol?

[Pah]

It`s ALL here.<br>Simply THE most stunningly informative synopsis (700 pages covering 600 years!) on who is (and always has been) behind the NWO and why. The Vatican is laid out to dry. A must read for anyone who needs some serious answers regarding what`s on the agenda next.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.focusnz.com/tractsforfree/VaticanAssassins.pdf">www.focusnz.com/tractsfor...assins.pdf</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>ps. This is NOT to be confused with the website under the same name. <br>This text is now out of print and banned by the Vatican.<br><br>pps. Regards the pending Sino-Russian-Moslem-Cuban attack on the USA described at the close of this text I was interested that the JapanTimes today ran a story on the front page that stated clearly: `China may be planning a massive Naval attack on Japan`. But read the above text and you`ll see that that`s only the beginning. <br>America WAKE UP!!!<br><br>P. <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

"ALL here"! -- "Simply THE most stunningly informative synopsis"! -- "A must read"! -- "NOT to be confused"! -- "only the beginning"! -- "WAKE UP!!!"!<br><br>T. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/25/06 8:55 am<br></i>

[mother]

For at the very least the 1500 years the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as defined by Papal Bull ,ex cathedra,(where the expression 'set in stone' originates) was offered in every tabenacle of the world. This means that it was utterly perfect and immutable, truth being truth and therefore unchangable. Never, ever to be altered even until the end of time, perpetual. The Church having an apostolic line from the first pope, St. Peter(upon this rock, the gates of Hell shall never prevail) The Pope, being the Vicar of Christ, His Holy representative on Earth sometimes saints, a few really bad ones, some anti-popes, meaning they were invalid for one reason or another. Obviously there have always been bitter enemies of the Church for a variety of reasons, good, bad or indifferent, but scripture tells us that eventually when a number of things come to pass, the Antichrist will be at large, that's when things get really, really scary. So goes the continuous battle between good and evil. the Catholic Church has always been the most powerful, and feared i guess, so it's the biggest target for evil, or the greatest geopolitical prize depending on one's point of view. If you believe in the True Presence of Christ confected in the Mass, you'll know that immense graces flow as a result, you'll know of many bona fide miricles and so forth. But it must be done perfectly. So if you mess around with it, it will no longer be Cathoilic, and the result is chaos. The Novus Ordo is less Catholic than the High Anglican done properly. The use of Latin was illegally suppressed, the important words at the Consecration changed, but because few understood latin in the first place the trick was easy to pull off, and before 1958 Catholics were very obedient anyway. So with an invalid mass, strategic placement of "wolves in sheep's clothing" and the mass exit of religious, a lot of bad people became priests and nuns and those normally suitable for the rigors of a religious vocation turned away. This is my pathetic attempt at trying to explain. actually dbeach is better and to the point! <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

I spent a bit of my time addressing you in what I consider to be a thoughtful way. You could at least have the decency to acknowledge me, instead of stepping over the issue and pointing people to those who agree with you. Maybe I'm being impatient, so I'll wait and see... <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>

[mother]

I agree that the Vatican has suppressed the so-called Third Secret of Fatima in order to protect the guilty. As far as masons go, I'm taking Saint Pope Pius X's word on it <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> I think that intolerance to describe Hitler is rather an understatement, thoughtographer. As for the news flash on the 'Black Pope": I can not be so certain of the merit of Eric Phelps' conclusions. Although it is very possible for at least one evil genius Jesuit to be in charge of something terrible, and for there to be a lot of people in denial about it. <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

So, what was this "third secret" about, Mother Sarcasm? I asked nicely, and got nothing much in return but disrespect. You're going to take the word of a Pope who's been dead since 1914 about the nature of an organization that still exists today? That sounds reasonable to me!<br><br>Blaming the rise of the Nazis to power on speculative details and lame, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories belittles the reality of the issue by pushing it into "fantasyland" territory. You're talking about denial? Understatements? That's a fucking laugh. Give me respect and you'll get it back, but if you blow me off an give me weak, insulting responses in return -- don't expect me to be nice.<br><br>(edited for those pesky apostrophes) <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/25/06 8:47 pm<br></i>

[Pah]

You know Mr Thoughtoholic,<br>you, in the last three posts have, by your general tone and manner of addressing people, clearly revealed your massive inferiority complex; hidden beneath a rather pointed aggression if I may say. It`s very unpleasant.<br>Why the arrogance? What are you afraid of? Perhaps the TRUTH? <br>Only you and most of the planet...<br><br>Your ego needs some Mother-Nature me thinks.<br>P.<br><br>ps. I will not respond to you again until you behave better. Let mother guide you in some lessons of humility. Carry on please mother.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">RE: THOUGHTO-EGO.</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--><br><br> "a healthy respect for the individual takes me a long way down the narrow path that Christ (and many others) would have me walk".<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>"I spent a bit of my time addressing you in what I consider to be a thoughtful way. You could at least have the decency to acknowledge me..."<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>"So, what was this "third secret" about, Mother Sarcasm? I asked nicely, and got nothing much in return but disrespect".<br>You're talking about denial? Understatements? That's a fucking laugh. Give me respect and you'll get it back, but if you blow me off an give me weak, insulting responses in return -- don't expect me to be nice".<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><br>"I love Christians, Masons, Muslims, Jews and everyone else alike, because my RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD IS MY OWN".<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>So there are just you and HIM in that ego of yours, eh boyo?<br>Funny, and I thought he was equally present in Everyman.<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>We must be thankful for the smallest of mercies...I guess. Rant on.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>P.<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=pah@rigorousintuition>Pah</A> at: 5/25/06 9:33 pm<br></i>

[mother]

I don't expect you to be nice. <p></p><i></i>

[Pah]

Hi mother,<br>Thank you for your illuminating posts regarding your Catholic faith. It takes exactly that sometimes to speak up amidst the drone of tinkering sycophants. <br>What did you think of the BP article then? Perhaps, as Thoughtographer `kindly` pointed out, I was rather too excited in my previous post, but don`t let that put you off. The whole article is just so deep and well-researched that one couldn`t possibly make any of it up.<br>At least IMHO.<br>I notice Thoughtographer had nothing SPECIFIC to say about the article itself and merely `attacked` my enthusiasm; a common reaction when one`s faced with a truth so confounding that one`s reality risks being turned upside down. Still, history shows: "Truth is at first ridiculed; then oft violently opposed, until finally it`s accepted as common sense".<br><br>Until later maybe.<br>P.<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=pah@rigorousintuition>Pah</A> at: 5/25/06 9:45 pm<br></i>

[thoughtographer]

Thanks for the deep, meaningful "analysis", Doctor P. Sycophant -- time to put out the shingle, eh? A few people around here seem a little too concerned about my "ego" whenever I say something they don't like, yet many of those same people seem to eschew the mental health establishment's opinion on pretty much everything. Why is that? Seems like a bit of a double-standard to me.<br><br>I suppose my tone must indicate arrogance because you say so, which of course leads to me being afraid of the "truth" -- well, your version of it, at least.<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>ps. I will not respond to you again until you behave better. Let mother guide you in some lessons of humility. Carry on please mother.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>What would Freud have said about you telling me to "behave better" lest I risk you not responding to me because I'm not letting "mother" give me "lessons of humility"? He's dead, but I'm sure it's somewhere in all of the garbage he put forth -- and I'm sure it would have something to do with me wanting to crawl back into my lovely mother's womb.<br><br>If acting the way I've been acting will spare me more of your shitty advice, then expect to be seeing more of the same in the future. Is this the response you expected? I'm sure you expected something, and I'm sure I would have been wrong no matter what I said, so -- fuck you. Your advice was was both unsolicited and free, and it was worth every penny. Keep your half-assed psychological analysis to yourself, asshole. If you want to talk, then talk about the topic at hand and keep your "dittos" below deck if they're going to be accompanied by swipes about my "ego".<br><br>How is "thoughtographer the patient" anything less that sarcastic and insulting? If I didn't say anything, "mother" probably would have ignored addressing my points at all, but I gave her a chance and she fucking insulted me.<br><br>P.S. - Post some more emoti-cons, why don't you? There's nothing like replacing real words and emotions with a bunch of out of context quotes and a bunch of empty, irritating and meaningless "I'm having a nice day" abstractions that serve as nothing but placeholders for your "real" emotions and help to avoid the point -- right? If you want to talk about me, then fine, but that's not what I'm here for.<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Funny, and I thought he was equally present in Everyman.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Did I say he wasn't? I can't speak for "Everyman" -- can you?<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I don't expect you to be nice.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Yeah, you've made that painfully obvious. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/25/06 9:50 pm<br></i>

[Pah]

<br>"ALL here"! -- "Simply THE most stunningly informative synopsis"! -- "A must read"! -- "NOT to be confused"! -- "only the beginning"! -- "WAKE UP!!!"!<br><br>T.<br><br>"If you want to talk, then talk about the topic at hand".<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

Oh, goody, another fucking pissing match. Put it to rest, ok guys? Say what you have to say without all the instigating comments.<br><br><br>Hey, Starman, love the links. Can you believe this?<br><br>"...Beine was suspended from the priesthood in <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>1977</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> over allegations of sexual abuse, and in the mid-1990s the St. Louis archdiocese paid $110,000 to settle two lawsuits that alleged Beine sexually abused boys more than three decades earlier. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>He was formally removed from the priesthood earlier this month</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->.<br><br>It took them three decades (and how many more victims) to decide to remove him? <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

Oh, so you were just getting revenge for my goofy criticism of your review style -- I get it now. That's fair as far as I'm concerned, and if you would have just stuck with "turnabout" instead of attacking my "ego" and giving me your dumb opinions about my "personality", you probably would spared everyone a rant or two. I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings, and I can understand why you reacted that way.<br><br>"Schizo Offensive Vaginal Attention-Seeking Patient..."?<br><br>Wow, that's really offensive. Wrong, too...<br><br>Sorry, chiggerbit. I'm through. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/25/06 10:07 pm<br></i>

[Pah]

No, you didn`t hurt my feelings. <br>However, by allowing your patronising criticism of my goofiness to take priority over the content of an article which I consider extremely important you may put some people off. <br><br>I very much doubt that with narrow-minded arrogance such as yours that you even read the text before responding. You seem to have all the answers and merely need an audience which listens to you and validates your existence. I really think you should make a public apology to mother for your attitude towards her. It`s appalling.<br><br>Secondly, I said `schizo` because you seem unaware of the fact that you are guilty of the very thing you reproach others for.<br>Thirdly I said `vaginal` in reference to your own freudian reference to your mother`s womb and obvious lack of ability to see yourself as others may; truly wombed.<br>Fourthly I said `offensive` because THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN FROM THE START HERE. (Suggest rereading your posts)<br>Fifth I said `attention-seeking` because in your two or three posts to Mother it was all about her not `aknowledging` your presence.<br>Lastly `patient`; well that was your own self-analysis.<br><br>Are we done here?<br>P <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=pah@rigorousintuition>Pah</A> at: 5/28/06 12:14 am<br></i>

[thoughtographer]

No, I'm totally guilty. I never claim innocence; I'll task you with the burden of proof for that because I don't care to waste my time.<br><br>If my quoting of your shitty selling points for said article put people off, then good. Learn to be a better salesperson of ideas.<br><br>I've reread my posts, and every other post on this thread; I won't do it again, because I will NEVER see things your way, and I'm pretty sure the same would be true for you. What I won't read is your stupid article just because you demand it of me to participate in the discussion -- not even once.<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Fifth I said `attention-seeking` because in your two or three posts to Mother it was all about her not `aknowledging` your presence.<br>Lastly `patient`; well that was your own self-analysis.<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>If that's all that you saw, I suggest YOU go back and do some rereading.<br><br>P.S. - Need I remind people around here of the actual human beings that were persecuted by the Nazi regime simply because they belonged to Masonic lodges? I guess that was all part of their insidious plan, eh? If you want to talk about the Nazis... <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/25/06 10:40 pm<br></i>