by israelirealities » Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:04 pm
Yeah, DrDbugDU, I couldn't agree more. HOwever, there's a tricky part there with the "doing something". What I call "holocaust dynamics" requires a very sharp distinction between right action and foolish risk and distinction between preservation and collarboration. Its like walking a tight rope, and the stakes are high. People would gravitate towards not doing rather than taking risks, but this holocaust dynamics also tells us that not doing anything, along with the others, will NOT spare you in the long run. Effective action can be a decision to run away and hide, bribe with a lot of money, cooperate for the minimal requirements to survive, live as zombi to numb yourself against the pain. Resisting directly, might indeed prove to be futile and the punishment will be exemplary. So in the case of journalists, the one who will defy, or if some do, the one who will be chosen as a symbol, will suffer much. THere is NO human instinct for the basic action of solidarity and organization. It requires movement AGAINST inertia. And so, what you are missing in your analysis is "leadership". Groups of Journalists, or lawyers, or workers what not, do not just coordinate rebelious actions. You have to find them, connect them with each other, coordinate and orchestrate a concerted action along those lines. THe enemy, a very keen and alert body, will know what you are up to and fight it. And so, you have two obstacles now, the enemy (already organized and ruthless) and the general human trait to just wonder around aimlessly, avoiding pain and trouble for the time being and pushing the other person, near them, to the danger they hope to avoid. So on a personal level you have to identify carefully the precise place where you can resist and disturb the rival, without dying for it. (unless you carefully plan to do that...). Usually, I think this precise point may not be the one you think first, it is something in you, in your personal life, something that collaborates, bribed...so the "action" could eventually be a small "no" you say, that you should have said eons ago. And not a grand revolution with blood in the streets. Or even a loving yes you failed to do. To each his own. <br>I agree with you that Buddhism as structure would not be different from what we already know here. Hierarchy, professional clergy, discrimination against women...<br> <br><br> <p></p><i></i>