Lord Hutton's Famous Church

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Mrs Janice Kelly (the bereaved widow)

Postby antiaristo » Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:26 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>C/Eusebio Navarro, 12<br>Mrs Janice Kelly                                35003 Las Palmas de Gran<br>Correos certificado 99790ES                        Spain                Canaria<br>                                                20 August 2003 <br>Dear Mrs Kelly,<br><br>I offer you my deepest condolences and sympathy.<br><br>Your late husband was led by his conscience and his common decency, and he did the honourable thing. But he did not know all of the facts. For example, to quote Iain Scott, speaking within those very same Royal Courts of Justice on 20 December 1994. “You do not know what you are up against.” Your late husband, like me, was up against the Windsor family and their filthy, homicidal Freemasonry. They might have verified their own story, but chose to go after their “enemy”. To buckle under that sort of pressure is to be human.<br><br>After reading the Queens Counsel’s questions and Campbell’s replies I think their strategy is becoming clear. The “smoking gun” is that meeting of the JIC held on 9 September 2002 and which was chaired by Alastair Campbell. And they are going to bury it amidst a sea of revelations. Just like they buried John Cleary all those years ago.<br><br>I’m not going to tell you my story. God knows you have enough on your plate right now. But I would like you to read a letter I wrote to Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, on 26 August 2002.<br><br>The reason this is relevant is that the letter effectively seals-off the option of invasion using Royal Prerogative powers alone. Once this letter was in the public domain Blair was always going to need the authority of Parliament (if not of the people) for legal reasons. So “they became desperate for evidence” around 28/29 August 2002.<br><br>At the time I wrote to Mr Annan the “Dossier” actually covered four countries, of which one was Iraq. On 10/11 September the “Dossier” focussed exclusively on Iraq and incorporated both the “45 minute” claim and the “Saddam sought uranium from Niger” claim. (I think this version is what Campbell is referring to when he talks about the “first draft”.)<br><br>Between 26 August and 10 September a lot of things happened in 16 days.<br>30 August                the “45 minute” claim “just popped up”<br>03 September                Mr Blair promised us a “Dossier within weeks”<br>05 September                “Structure as per TB’s discussion”<br>09 September                the “45 minute” claim “was seized on”<br>10 September                “First draft” of the “Dossier” produced<br><br>Why are Powell and Campbell allowed to give their performances from written, non-contemporaneous notes (scripts)? If you recall the Star libel case we weren’t allowed to see Archer’s diary either – for “national security reasons”. And that turned out to be fake and a perversion of the course of justice fourteen years later. Mrs Kelly, I’m going to advise you to be 100 percent cynical when it comes to everybody that is a part of the British Establishment. I’ve got two cases before the European Court of Human Rights and I can tell you stories about the Windsors that will turn your hair white. So don’t doubt for a minute what your instincts tell you:<br><br>        On 28/29 August the British needed evidence.<br>        On 30 August the British created that evidence.<br>        On 9 September the British authenticated that evidence.<br><br>So when your late husband reported that Alastair Campbell had inserted the 45-minute claim he was being 100 percent truthful. For Campbell had indeed chaired the very meeting which “inserted” the claim. Yes it was the JIC. But it was the JIC as chaired by a domineering Alastair Campbell waving around his bloody enormous Royal Prerogative. <br><br>It is now clear that your late husband reported what happened on 9 September 2002. If they cheat and bury that very real event they bury their guilt. And in so doing make a fantasist of your late husband.<br>Yours sincerely,<br>John Cleary BSc MA MBA<br><br>Cc        Andrew Gilligan         Lee Hughes <br>European Court of Human Rights (refs. 23188/03 & 24316/03)<br>        Henry Waxman        Joseph Wilson<br><br>Enc.        Cleary Second Affidavit 30 January 1995<br>        Cleary to Kofi Annan 26 August 2002<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>Added on edit<br><br>With the passage of time we all forget what was once fresh in our minds.<br>The source of the quotes in this letter:<br><br>"they became desperate for evidence" David Kelly<br>"just popped up" David Kelly<br>"Structure as per TB's discussion" JIC memo<br>"was siezed on" David Kelly<br>"National security reasons" trial judge<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 2/23/06 6:30 am<br></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: A Little “Identity” Crisis

Postby havanagila » Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:29 pm

tal1, this is a fascinating post. I love william blake a lot, and now I see new facts about his spiritual world. I am also just starting to get a glimpse of the Christian "complex" with Judaism. namely, the Jew has to be usurped or appropriated, (no just ignored) in order for the new religion to be really really authentic. I think this accounts for the bitter yet symbiotic relationship bn western Jews and their Christian hosts. <br>This entire English Israelites doesn't look good to me. It reminds me, too much, of the Christian Zionists. (the US version). <br>I will take a closer read later, thanks. <br><br>People are always more crazy than one assumes. <p></p><i></i>
havanagila
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: A Little “Identity” Crisis

Postby * » Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:09 pm

<br> You can't really blame William Blake for the thesis, though it certainly casts a new light on some of his poetry:<br><br> <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong> Oh Jerusalem</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br> And did those feet in ancient time<br> Walk upon England's mountains green?<br> And was the holy Lamb of God<br> On England's pleasant pastures seen?<br><br> And did the Countenance Divine<br> Shine forth upon our clouded hills?<br> And was Jerusalem builded here<br> Among these dark Satanic mills?<br><br> Bring me my bow of burning gold!<br> Bring me my arrows of desire!<br> Bring me my spear! O clouds unfold!<br> Bring me my chariot of fire!<br><br> I will not cease from mental fight,<br> Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand<br> Till we have built Jerusalem<br> In England's green and pleasant land.<br><br> -- William Blake</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br> <br><br>Rather than a sympathy or empathy with <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>actual</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> Jews, British-Israelism is a usurpation of the historical narrative/birthright<br>and the genesis of the Christian Identity/Fundamentalist movement in the US.<br><br> from: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.revneal.org/Writings/british.htm">IMPERIAL BRITISH-ISRAELISM: JUSTIFICATION FOR AN EMPIRE</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br> "....In its simplest form, British-Israelism claims that the British people are the descendants of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, deported, initially, by Tiglath Pilezer III, king of Assyria, when he launched an invasion of the Kingdom of Israel in 740 B.C.E., and later by the successor of Shalmaneser V, Sargon II, who destroyed its capital city, Samaria, in 721 B.C.E. While this is the most important "article of faith" to be found in all British-Israelite movements, it is almost always followed by these subordinate, but crucial, points:<br><br> 1. The English throne is the throne of David<br><br> 2. The English royal family is of lineal descent from David, King of Israel, and from Zerah, brother of Perez, son of Judah<br><br> 3. The British Empire and the Church of England are the modern-day manifestation of the true Kingdom of God<br><br> 4. The British people are chosen by God to rule the earth.<br><br>In addition to these key points, it is possible to identify a number of critical, paradigmatic positions within British-Israelite theory which help to define and characterize the movement. The concept of the "birthright" is one of these auxiliary themes. By "birthright" is meant the promises given by God throughout the Hebrew Bible to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jacob's descendants. Among the more important of the birthright promises were those which spoke about the descendants of Abraham as being both a great nation and a multitude of nations, while also being as numerous as "the dust on the sea shore and the stars in the heavens." These promises were also seen as including references to the quality of the birthright people, identifying them as powerful, invincible, and superior to all other nations and races.<br><br>These promises were passed, virtually intact, from Abraham to Isaac, and from Isaac to Jacob. Then Jacob, due to the sins of Reuben, his first born, split the birthright promises between his two most prominent sons, Joseph and Judah. The recognition of this division in the Birthright is of paramount importance in British-Israelite ideology, for it allows them to trace the Birthright away from Judah and to the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Joseph did not get everything, however, for from the body of the birthright Jacob took the rights of kingship and lawmaking to give to Judah in perpetuity. The House of Joseph, primarily his son Ephraim, later became the nucleus around which the "ten tribes" of the Northern Kingdom, Israel, would rally. The House of Judah would rule over the United Kingdom, as well as being the major part of the Southern Kingdom, Judah, following the political split after the death of Solomon.<br><br>Israel and Judah existed as separate kingdoms for two hundred-years until, after a long war with the Assyrian Empire, Israel finally succumbed to the forces of Sargon II in 721 B.C.E. With this begins the British-Israelite themes of Punishment and Displacement, which state that because Israel worshiped idols God allowed the Assyrian Empire to defeat and relocate them just south of Lake Van, along the border between Assyria, Urartu, and the Median Empire.<br><br>This is not only an important point in their theory, it is an essential junction for all forms of Celtic-Anglo-Saxon Israelism. Israel, descended from the House of Joseph and possessor of the birthright promises, is re-settled by Assyria. She subsequently vanishes from the pages of Scripture and history, initiating the themes of "the Great Trek", and "the Wilderness Place in the Isles Afar off". These themes follow the displaced tribes of the Northern Kingdom through the Caucasus Mountains and then west, across Europe, to settle in Scandinavia, other areas of northwest Europe, and, finally, in the British Isles. Here, the theme of "Christians in the Wilderness" comes into play, claiming that these Lost Tribes would become Christian in these very same Isles. Through these basic paradigms, the people of Great Britain, and their descendants across the globe, are discovered to be the direct, lineal descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel, recipients of the birthright promises, true holders of the name of Israel, destined rulers of the Earth.<br><br>At this point British-Israelite theory must return to the division of the Birthright between the Houses of Joseph and Judah, where the themes of "Scepter and Lawmaking", the "Lineage of the Scarlet Thread", the "House of David", and the "Call of Jeremiah" can be found. Until this point, the brunt of the theory has focused on the Northern Kingdom, Israel, and the birthright promises given to it by Jacob. From here, the theory turns its focus to the kingly role of the House of Judah, the division of the kingship between Judah’s twin sons, Zerah and Perez, and the eternal establishment of the Throne of David over both Judah and Israel...."<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
*
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to Religion and the Occult

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests