Sheehan to Be Arrested Thursday National Security Threat

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Geraldine Comley

Postby Sweejak » Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:49 am

No, but I was really really antsy about it. I wasn't, I just had too much work piling up. Apparently this will be going on a while so there is plenty of time and I may take a day off and stay the night as well. During the week might be good because they might need the support during the quieter time of the weekdays. I am very interested in how this will develop.<br><br>You know if she is incorruptable they will have to try kill or disable her. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

The Last Straw?

Postby robertdreed » Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:00 am

"...Even if the President saw her, she would not be satisified with any answer that he gives her. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>They could pull out top secret data</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> and show it to her and it still would not be enough..."<br><br>Norman, while your statement is phrased as a hypothetical, you're implying that such "top secret data" exists. <br><br>I suppose you're still convinced that the WMDs exist- only instead of their presence being kept "top secret" by Saddam Hussein, now it's the Bush administration doing so. <br><br><br>That's what I call "grasping at straws."<br><br>Such naive trust of George W. Bush- or, more to the point, the office of the Presidency- is by no means uncommon among Americans. They seem to think that there's some sort of "commutative property" of government, that once someone is elected president of the USA = they're automatically a trustworthy person, no matter what their subsequent words and actions may indicate to the contrary. <br><br>Perhaps President Bush might have even gotten away with calling for the invasion of Iraq on the grounds of unspecified "top secret reasons", and Congress would still have gone for it. I'm fairly sure that at least a few of them would have, with no awareness at all of the irony. <br><br>But Bush didn't do that. His administration made detailed allegations of sophisticated and ongoing Chemical, Biological, and Nuclear weapons research programs that he alleged were being kept "top secret"by Saddam. <br><br>If those programs were in fact found, why continue to keep that news a secret? <br><br>By the way, how's your memory? <br><br>As far as I'm concerned, perhaps the most effective thing that anti-Iraq War talk radio hosts could do would be to dig out those old archives of Rush Limbaugh and his imitators in the months before the Iraq invasion, and for a few months afterward. Dig up every tall tale, every wild conjecture, every rumor passed off as fact, every glowing promise...make a greatest hits compilation, and broadcast it. <br><br>There would hardly even be a need for comment, afterward. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 8/15/05 4:19 am<br></i>
robertdreed
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

accessing rightwing radio talk shows.. How?

Postby darkbeforedawn » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:00 am

great thought robertdreed. I love it. How do we go about accessing these archives. I know some repuglicans who really need to review this material.! Thanks <p></p><i></i>
darkbeforedawn
 

Your answer

Postby Norman Miller » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:08 am

I am my own tool. I'm an independent, not a Republican. By the way, I find so many Liberals use the word "tool", when someone disagrees with thier view. That tells me, your the real "tool" here. <p></p><i></i>
Norman Miller
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: accessing rightwing radio talk shows.. How?

Postby Sweejak » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:08 am

Why doesn't google allow you to search by date? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Your answer II

Postby Norman Miller » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:20 am

First off...Robert. <br><br>I have found that most people already make up thier minds about what political side they sit on early on. You can try to convince them into a different direction for the rest of your life and nothing will change. Therefore, I have my own opinions and you have yours. Your opinions are no better than the next person's and you do not have a hold on the truth. Neither do I. All that can be done, is to vote and let the chips fall where they may. In this case..it falls on the Republican side and no matter what you do, you will not effect change in the current adminsitration. No impeachment...nothing. You and others like you are nothing more than annoyances at best. As for the future....I feel it is important to have changes in government. Personally I would like to see at least one branch of the government be lead by the Democrats. Only because I feel, people such as yourself need an avenue to blow off steam. Now be a good Liberal and copy a portion of my statement and send me a response. <p></p><i></i>
Norman Miller
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Your answer

Postby sunny » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:30 am

Norman, my queston was rhetorical- in other words, you accuse Cindy of being a "patsy" (maybe I should have used that word) without offering evidence- therefore, the same could be said of you, without evidence. I have no reason to believe that you are not sincere in your views. (every reason to think you are watching too much msm) <br>Perhaps you should give Cindy as much of the benefit of doubt that you would wish others to have for you. You know, that whole "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" thing.<br>Just because Gold Star Mothers for Peace and other organizations have rallied behind Cindy doesn't mean that she isn't wholly committed to what she is doing. However, one point that you make has merit; it really makes no difference whether Bush meets with her, the fact that he probably won't will speak volumes about his character to many Americans, and this is a worthy goal in and of itself.<br>Stick around Norman, and you will see that this is not DU, where most are unquestioning supporters of the Dems. We here at RI are equal opportunity critics of elites, whatever their party. <p></p><i></i>
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Your answer

Postby dbeach » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:49 am

I am registered dem but either party is the same.<br><br>right wing left wing 2 broken wings of the same fascist party<br><br>conditioning is that it has to be this way cuz the elites are so powerful..thats your conditioning..they are beatable on every level particularly the spiritual level.<br><br>dems ,repukes l,bertarians name some party.<br><br>they don't repesent me .<br>the elites world is built on lies..its gonna come down..I fully intend to live through it ..<br><br>RESIST <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Interesting

Postby Norman Miller » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:57 am

Fine, but like I said. You have your opinions and I have mine. From what I have heard and read, this whole thing is coming to a conclusion sooner than later. Land owners are getting miffed and large counter-demonstrations are occurring. If this keeps up...the police will be forced to disperse the crowd. By the way....I read the other threads already. No need to point me to them.<br><br>PS....after being in political forums for YEARS, I have found that evidence means nothing. I could show you it and then someone will just refute it, others will chime in and point to something else and all that work will go to naught. It is a waste of good research.<br><br>I like the idea that your a critic of either party, but after decades of being politically active, I decided that it was a waste of time and just turns you into a hateful person. I prefer to listen to what the issues are and then vote for who I believe is better. I could careless what party they belong to. Being independant is a "release" for post political junkies. Let the others raise the stink, in the end the only thing that counts is that vote.<br><br>Norm<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://weirdevents.blogspot.com">weirdevents.blogspot.com</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Norman Miller
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Interesting

Postby dbeach » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:00 am

"in the end the only thing that counts is that vote.'<br><br>YES AND WHO COUNTS THE VOTES ASK JOE STALIN<br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

help him peel the veils away

Postby AnnaLivia » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:02 am

oh, dear heavens, don't anybody chase Norman off. if he believes any of this madness that cost Cindy her precious son is about liberals vs. conservatives or democrats vs. republicans, then he needs to be at a site like this more than anyone.<br><br>i mean it, Norman. one of the biggest lies you've been hoodwinked into buying is that the divide is political.<br><br>it ain't. but as long as they can keep you believing in that fairy tale, you'll never rise up against the true enemy. THE DIVIDE IS ECONOMIC. it's those who produce the wealth of the world vs. those who live in stratospheric luxury off the labor of others.<br><br>why do you think they call it "the leisure class"???? <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Who counts the vote.

Postby Norman Miller » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:03 am

Actually it is people like me, who have done it. Stalin is dead and buried.<br><br>Norm<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://weirdevents.blogspot.com">weirdevents.blogspot.com</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Norman Miller
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Oh Heavens

Postby Norman Miller » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:05 am

I'll let you rise up. I have work to do.<br><br>Be back later..<br><br>Norm<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://weirdevents.blogspot.com">weirdevents.blogspot.com</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
Norman Miller
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

call a doctor

Postby AnnaLivia » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:09 am

"been in political forums for years"..."decades of being politically active"...and you still think they are actually counting your vote?????????????<br><br>this is a more severe case than i thought. <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Cindy's of world know to prioritize survival

Postby AnnaLivia » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:16 am

"I'll let you rise up. I have work to do."<br><br>yr suggesting i don't?<br><br>your strong suit is not correct prioritization, is it.<br> <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Iraq

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests