US rape in Iraq = lynching negroes on Yahoo

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Proof

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:57 pm

What is unusual about the history of media control by the National inSecurity State?<br><br>Read my above post.<br><br>I noticed that some of my links didn't come out. Hmm... <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

can't prove a negative

Postby Dreams End » Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:46 pm

Sorry, Hugh. YOu can't ask pan or anyone to prove that Nacho Libre wasn't ordered from Langley. I challenge YOU to prove Santa doesn't exist. You won't be able to because I'll have an answer to every objection.<br><br><br>And you fell back on giving us good info on the national security state. That's great but it doesn't prove that THIS particular example, or any that you site, is a result of that. I'm not sure why this isn't clear to you.<br><br>If you just tossed in a few "seems to me's" or "this seems possible" it wouldn't be so grating. But to assert something is absolutely true with no evidence is just annoying people I guess.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

Paper Clips

Postby professorpan » Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:31 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>You make these scoffing statements with no discussion of the long history of covering up the US-Nazi connection.<br><br>Miramax made the film, not eighth grade students.<br>That's why Project Paperclip is on the top eye-level shelf at my local video rental store.<br><br>You honestly think this is a coincidence that that the US protection of Nazi war criminals as assets was called EXACTLY the same thing? Exactly?<br><br>wow.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Wow is right. <br><br>If you took five minutes out of your feverish bouts of speculation, or maybe even rented the film and watched it, you might understand how it came about. A principal of a school in rural Tennesee created a classroom project to memorialize the 11 million victims of the Holocaust by collecting one paperclip for each victim.<br><br>Yeah, that was all planned from the start as a PSYOP to keep people from finding out the truth about Project Paperclip... right, Hugh? And the clerks at your video store were instructed to place it at eye-level... just in case someone in the video store was thinking, "Hmmm... I really need to dig into the secret deals between the U.S. government and Nazis after World War Two... particularly the Bush family connection... Oh, wait! Cool, look, a movie about kids with paperclips! What was I thinking about a minute ago? Oh, fuck it, I'll just rent this movie and nuke a Lean Cuisine and stop driving myself crazy with silly historical conspiracies!"<br><br>from Wikipedia:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_Clips_Project">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pap...ps_Project</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The documentary film about the project was officially released in 2004. Joe Fab of The Johnson Group, who eventually became the producer, director, and writer, initially started to think about making a movie. However, it looked more like a story for a TV magazine. He filmed as several Holocaust survivors from New York visited the school and shared their experiences with the community at a church. Out of this footage, he made a raw seven-minute presentation. This "demo" helped to convince the Miramax film company that this project was worth a full-length movie. It was described as not yet another movie showing the tragedy, but a project of hope and inspiration.<br><br>The movie features interviews with students, teachers, Holocaust survivors, and people who sent paper clips. It also shows how the railcar traveled from Baltimore to Whitwell. The creators had accumulated about 150 hours of footage. The movie was shown for the first time in November 2003 in Whitwell.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Yep -- all orchestrated to keep the brainwashed masses from demanding the truth about how the U.S. intelligence apparatus coddled Nazis a half a century ago.<br><br>I've asked before, but I will ask again -- are you ever even the teensiest bit uncertain about your theories? Might the film <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Paper Clips</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> be just what it is? Might it be on a shelf in your video store because some guy working there liked it, and thought it deserved to be seen?<br><br>Might you... gasp!... be occasionally<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em> wrong?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: can't prove a negative

Postby NewKid » Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:53 am

Hugh, like DE said, I think most of us are in agreement on the general. It's the particulars here that strike people as farfetched. Hannah Montana and John Hannah, Nacho Libre, Medea Benjamin, and the display of links and pictures on a yahoo page are all seem like a lot of effort for very little gain. Most of that stuff doesn't seem particularly threatening or likely to induce people away from a dangerous line of inquiry and the coordination required to time events with movie releases and such would be significant. <br><br>I'm all for looking for social conditioning, but I think there are better places to look. How much time is spent reviewing all this stuff, writing posts, and defending these claims? What about Tom Cruise related research? He's a scientologist, he's in Eyes Wide Shut and he's in Magnolia. Jenna Elfman runs around screaming at people asking them if they've raped babies in broad daylight. Ho hum? <br><br>I suspect there's a bunch of wacky hidden shit in movies and fiction books that would be better worth looking at. <br><br>Maeterlinck's play "The Cloud that Lifted"<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.forbesbookclub.com/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=IEWTW" target="top">www.forbesbookclub.com/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=IEWTW</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <br><br>or <br><br>Martin Keating's "The Final Jihad" kind of stuff. <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=145" target="top">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=145</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0964704811?v=glance" target="top">www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0964704811?v=glance</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->)<br><br>Or what the deal with this guy is?<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.wtc.truck.bombs.fbi.jack.kelley.rm" target="top">www.terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.wtc.truck.bombs.fbi.jack.kelley.rm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001-02-05-binladen.htm" target="top">www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001-02-05-binladen.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.realitymacedonia.org.mk/web/news_page.asp?nid=1043" target="top">www.realitymacedonia.org.mk/web/news_page.asp?nid=1043</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-03-18-2004-03-18_kelleymain_x.htm" target="top">www.usatoday.com/news/2004-03-18-2004-03-18_kelleymain_x.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=3613" target="top">www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=3613</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br> <br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=newkid@rigorousintuition>NewKid</A> at: 7/6/06 11:40 pm<br></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

linguistic framing tactics

Postby Mentalgongfu » Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:53 am

Hugh said elsewhere:<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br> I truly wonder whether even the readers of this board can perceive the subtlety of linguistic framing tactics used to achieve stealth predispositions in culture war and info war.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I can perceive "the subtlety of linguistic framing tactics used to achieve stealth predispositions in culture war and info war," I just don't often agree with your readings. <br><br>Perhaps the difference lies in your own assumptions and interpretations of the cultural phenomena and the celebrities you frequently reference with the assumptions and interpretations of others.<br><br>Whatever it is you see in this Yahoo page, I don’t see it. Even if it is intended as a tool of manipulation, it is highly ineffective, as myself and many others seem wholly unaffected. But I don’t see any “black-on-white” theme aimed at taking me back to “plantation America.” <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Mentalgongfu
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: linguistic framing tactics

Postby orz » Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:30 am

HEY GUYS I just read on the internet that stationary stores are selling little bent pieces of wire that are supposedly used to hold documents together, and calling them "paperclips!" Coincidence? I think not! They must think we're stupid, it's an obvious scheme to turn the word "paperclip" into a household name in order to supress discussion of Project Paperclip!<br><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :x --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/sick.gif ALT=":x"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Fort Bliss:We the team

Postby rain » Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:32 am

I was going to suggest - just scoogle -<br><br>here's what came up on mine<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=paper+clip">www.google.com/search?q=paper+clip</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>but then on page 2 -<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=paper+clip&num=20&hl=en&lr=&start=20&sa=N">www.google.com/search?q=p...rt=20&sa=N</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>with this at the top,<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://jubal.westnet.com/hyperdiscordia/paperclip.html">jubal.westnet.com/hyperdi...rclip.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>bingo!<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://helix.gatech.edu/classes/ME4182/1999Q2/Webs/ProjectPaperClip/pcliphistory.htm">helix.gatech.edu/classes/...istory.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>The Origin of <br>"Project Paperclip" <br>or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb. <br>After WWII there was a great effort by both the American and Soviet governments to assimilate the wealth of German technological knowledge; in particular their knowledge of liquid propelled rockets. Under the guidance of Dr. Wernher von Braun a group of German rocket scientists defected to American forces, and were swept away to Fort Bliss in White Sands, New Mexico. At Fort Bliss this team began work on "Project Paperclip"; laying the ground work for the successful start of the American Space Program. These engineers were later moved to Redstone Arsenal just outside the sleepy southern town of Huntsville, Alabama. At Redstone Arsenal they created the Redstone Rocket (a ballistic missile), which relied heavily on the earlier work from the V-2 test-bed at White Sands. This rocket was later modified . . . the warhead removed . . . the payload exchanged . . . with a space capsule. This Mercury-Redstone rocket took the first American, Alan Shepard, into space. Although this project was conceived to produce ballistic missiles for the DOD, these original scientist made the push to create NASA, and further the pursuit of space exploration. In my mind . . . "Project Paperclip", and the diligent work of that team started it all. <br><br>The following is an except from an article posted on the NASA site that relates some of the interesting facts leading up to the founding of "Project Paperclip." If you are interested in viewing it in the context of the entire article, please feel free to follow this link. <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4201/ch1-3.htm">www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pa.../ch1-3.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <br><br>"The story of German achievements in military rocketry during the late thirties and early forties at Peenemuende, the vast military research installation on the Baltic Sea, is well known. Knowing Goddard's work only through his published findings, the German experimenters contrived and elaborated on nearly all of the American's patented technical innovations, including gyroscopic controls, parachutes for rocket recovery, and movable deflector vanes in the exhaust. The rocket specialists at Peenemuende were trying to create the first large, long-range military rocket. By 1943, after numerous frustrations, they had their "big rocket," 46 feet long by 11½ feet in diameter, weighing 34,000 pounds when fueled, and producing 69,100 pounds of thrust from a single engine consuming liquid oxygen and a mixture of alcohol and water. Called "Assembly-4" (A-4) by the Peenemuende group, the rocket had a range of nearly 200 miles and a maximum velocity of about 3,500 miles per hour, and was controlled by its gyroscope and exhaust deflector vanes, sometimes supplemented by radio control. When Major General Walter Dornberger, commander of the army works at Peenemuende, pronounced the A-4 operational in 1944, Joseph Goebbels' propaganda machine christened it Vergeltungswaffe zwei (Vengeance Weapon No. 2), or "V-2." But for the space-travel devotees at Peenemuende the rocket remained the A-4, a step in the climb toward space. <br><br>Although the total military effect of the 3,745 V-2s fired at targets on the Continent and in England was slight, this supersonic ballistic missile threw a long shadow over the future of human society. As the Western Allies and the Soviets swept into Germany, they both sought to confiscate the elements of the German rocket program in the form of records, hardware, and people. Peenemuende was within the Russian zone of occupation, but before the arrival of the Soviet forces von Braun and most of the other engineers and technicians fled westward with a portion of their technical data. The Americans also captured the underground V-2 factory in the Harz Mountains; 100 partially assembled V-2s were quickly dismantled and sent to the United States. Ultimately von Braun and about 125 other German rocket specialists reached this country under "Project Paperclip," carried out by the United States Army." <br><br>So in the spirit of exploration and discovery, We the team, have dubbed ourselves "Project Paperclip." <br><br>In the words of Paul Harvey, "That's the rest of the story . . . . Good Day!"<br><br>gosh. I feel just so warm and fuzzy I could just hug a, er, 'German rocket scientist'<br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The FUCKING JOHNSON GROUP??!!!

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:02 am

BINGO. PAY DIRT. Thank you for following my lead, Prof Pan.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thejgroup.com/">www.thejgroup.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Read it and weep. Fucking CIA psy-op production company out of Maclean, Virginia working for the White House and Pentagon.<br><br>"Producers of the Christmas Pageant of Peace at the White House."<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Johnson Group produces the 2005 Pageant of Peace at The Ellipse near the White House.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thejgroup.com/project.html">www.thejgroup.com/project.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Bedford: The Town They Left Behind<br><br>Bedford: The Town They Left Behind (working title) is our latest documentary and is currently in pre-production. When finished, Bedford will share the enormous personal sacrifice of the small town of Bedford, Virginia – the community that lost more men per capita on D-Day than any other in America. And the sacrifice continues. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The Johnson Group plans to connect Bedford’s bravest soldiers from WWII to those from the community who serve in Iraq and Afghanistan today.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Is this what it takes for you all to see the culture warrior theme parks of 'entertainment'?<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.thejgroup.com/images/wk_bedford4.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.thejgroup.com/images/wk_bedford7.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 7/7/06 2:33 am<br></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: linguistic framing tactics

Postby orz » Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:09 am

Back on topic, Hugh; out of interest, how do you imagine the Yahoo site is run? <br><br>Because your idea about all this detailed subliminal meaning being put in there relies on it being coded by one guy sitting in a darkened room with the CIA on the line <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>But of course it's a huge site, created by a huge team of ordinary computer geeks employed to operate a pre-designed system into which the latest info/news is slotted... where in this process could your highly specific coded messages be input, and by whom?<br><br>More to the point I'm pretty sure much of the site will be automated... things like the latest news headlines etc are put in automatically using PHP or other scripting... also different content appears depending on your location etc... thus the juxtapositions you may read into are more or less random! That harms your theory somewhat, right?<br><br>If you have a yahoo account and are logged in, some aspects of the content on the site is even determined by what info yahoo hold about you marketing-wise...<br><br>Basically what i'm saying is that if you have any idea how major websites are made and run, your claims make no real sense.<br><br>EDIT TO CLARIFY: I don't for a moment disagree that there's all sorts of insane propaganda in our media... but it's found in the actual content, and is usually pretty overt... to get bogged down in paranoic connection of meaningless details is to miss the wood for the trees... <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=orz@rigorousintuition>orz</A> at: 7/7/06 2:13 am<br></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "meaningless details"

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:24 am

The devil is in the details where it gets through your filters and into your subconscious.<br><br>As I said and someone else repeated, not all the psycho-political debris thrown out is effective. But it is done. Some people get their paychecks by doing that psy-ops social engineering crap and they must deliver product 24/7, quality or not.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>But of course it's a huge site, created by a huge team of ordinary computer geeks employed to operate a pre-designed system into which the latest info/news is slotted... where in this process could your highly specific coded messages be input, and by whom?<br><br>More to the point I'm pretty sure much of the site will be automated... things like the latest news headlines etc are put in automatically using PHP or other scripting... also different content appears depending on your location etc... thus the juxtapositions you may read into are more or less random! That harms your theory somewhat, right?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Consider how easy it is to create Yahoo's front page.<br>Consider how important it is to steer internet users away from subversive information or do psychic shock-absorbing distraction.<br>(I'm constantly amazed how bright wary people I know miss things until I point them out and they say "sheesh, how did I miss that. Now it is so obvious.")<br>Consider that the National inSecurity State has been doing this in every medium possible for 60 years.<br><br>Maybe you read about the stolen elections on Yahoo's front page.<br>No? Oh.<br><br>Maybe you read about the US war crimes in Fallujah on Yahoo's front page.<br>No? Oh.<br><br>Maybe you read about the trillions missing from the Pentagon on Yahoo's front page.<br>No?<br><br>Now that harms your guesswork theory somewhat, right? lol. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 7/7/06 2:31 am<br></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "meaningless details"

Postby orz » Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:47 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Maybe you read about the stolen elections on Yahoo's front page.<br>No? Oh.<br><br>Maybe you read about the US war crimes in Fallujah on Yahoo's front page.<br>No? Oh.<br><br>Maybe you read about the trillions missing from the Pentagon on Yahoo's front page.<br>No?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Exactly my point!!! This is the real issue, what the media actually does and doesn't report due to self and outside censorship and the influence of $$$$.... the underreporting of these issues is real, and a clear example of the propaganda nature of the news media... why not investigate the reasons for this without undermining yourself by mixing this up with speculation about juxtapositions that the nature of the yahoo site proves were clearly not deliberately chosen? <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "meaningless details"

Postby NewKid » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:04 am

Does look like it might be some kind of propaganda outfit.<br><br>Hugh, do any of these manuals you've seen mention "keyword hijacking" at all? Where did you hear of this phenomenon? Is there a situation you can point to that's a demonstrated example of it? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "keyword hijacking"

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:21 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Is there a situation you can point to that's a demonstrated example of it?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>How about <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>'Eichmann?'</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>In early 2005 a committee that had been formed several years earlier to oversee the release of documents about Nazi war criminals by the CIA managed to squeeze out the fact that <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>the CIA had hired as assets five of Adolph Eichmann's assistants.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>(You'll recall that recently the media made a big deal out of 'the US knew where Eichmann was after the war.' True but a classic limited hang-out.)<br><br>A few days before this story was briefly carried in the New York Times online edition, the Fox TV-Reich Wing echo chamber started screaming about a 9/12/01 comment by anti-imperialist Colorado University professor Ward Churchill.<br><br>Churchill was involved in the American Indian Movement in the early 1970s and co-wrote a book about the FBI's COINTELPRO program of harassing, jailing, and even murdering social activists. So he's a classic target for discrediting.<br><br>Churchill had been asked to write an essay the day after 9/11 and he wrote 'On Chickens Coming Home to Roost' about blowback from decades of fascist US policies.<br><br>He even suggested that not all the victims in the World Trade Center towers were "innocent" since there were CIA offices and some of their corporate allies working against the peoples of third world countries <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"like little Eichmanns."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Over three years later he was publicly crucified for 'blaspheming the memory of the 9/11 victims' like a 'typical liberal hate-America-first-type' to cover for the OTHER <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Eichmann</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> story which knocks the white hat off Uncle Sam who uses the 'saved the world from Hitler' theme as a blank check to bomb the rest of the world.<br><br>And even the Anti-defamation League covers for Prescott Bush on its 'internet rumors debunked' webpage by insisting that he didn't finance the Nazi Party. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "keyword hijacking"

Postby NewKid » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:27 am

With Churchill, anything's possible. He's a phony. But I really meant a situation where manuals talk about it or other people have admitted using that technique. I'm more interested in the where the concept came from. Is it something you think is the kind of stuff they'd do or have you seen this technique mentioned by someone else? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "keyword hijacking"

Postby NewKid » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:57 am

I can maybe believe the Ward Churchill comments were scripted when I see stuff like this:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Kelley wrote scripts to help at least three people mislead USA TODAY reporters trying to verify his work, documents retrieved from his company-owned laptop computer show. Two of the people are translators Kelley paid for services months or years before. Another is a Jerusalem businessman, portrayed by Kelley as an undercover Israeli agent.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-03-18-2004-03-18_kelleymain_x.htm" target="top">www.usatoday.com/news/2004-03-18-2004-03-18_kelleymain_x.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>One of the scripts was written last year as USA TODAY began questioning a pair of March, 2003, stories Kelley had filed from Karachi, Pakistan. One reported that he had joined intelligence agents on a hunt for Osama bin Laden. The other described a mosque where "pictures of President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair, with targets on their faces," were nailed to the door.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Kelley told USA TODAY that Khurram Butt, a Pakistani pilot, helped him with logistics on the stories and could verify them. He said Butt could be reached through a relative. Kelley provided phone numbers for the relative, who had worked with him on other stories.<br><br>But Kelley had created a script for the relative in his computer. The script, which had two e-mail addresses for the man at the top, asked for "a confidential favor."<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Kelley wrote that "the CIA has refused to acknowledge that it helped me with this story" and "has told me to come up with a cover story."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>CIA spokesman Bill Harlow called the explanation "not true."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>The script called for the relative to tell USA TODAY that Butt would "be traveling for the next 6-8 weeks and can't be reached." It also urged him to "please follow this script" when contacted by the newspaper.<br><br>A computer analysis could not determine conclusively whether Kelley e-mailed the script. However, the relative gave the requested answers in response to phone calls and e-mails from two USA TODAY reporters.<br><br>USA TODAY found Butt in Seattle, where he was in flight training for the new Boeing 777. He said he never worked with Kelley and met him only once, for 15-20 minutes, during a visit to his relative's home: "I have never been connected with journalism on anything."<br><br>In May, 2003, Kelley filed a travel reimbursement report with USA TODAY that listed $1,050 in payments to Butt for "interpretation and transportation services" related in part to the Karachi stories. The pilot said he "never" received money from Kelley.<br><br>Additionally, a Pakistani official said the drive Kelley described in the bin Laden story would take at least 10 hours, twice what he wrote. It is not possible to drive as fast as the 90 mph he reported, the official also said.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"I feel like I'm being set up,"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Kelley said Thursday when questioned about the story.<br><br>Israel<br><br>One document retrieved from Kelley's laptop is a primer to help a Jerusalem man vouch for a story published Sept. 4, 2001. The story was about a Jewish settler, Avi Shapiro. Kelley supposedly watched as Shapiro ordered settlers to shoot at a Palestinian taxi.<br><br>The document was created by Kelley on July 18, 2003, weeks after USA TODAY's first examination began. "Abou Adam" is a salutation that means "father of Adam." It refers to a Jersusalem businessman whom Kelley knows and who has a son named Adam. <br><br>Kelley has identified the man only as "David" to editors and insists David is an officer with Shin Bet, Israel's domestic security force. Interviewed Thursday in Jerusalem, the man says he is not Shin Bet but refused to answer questions. He also insisted on talking with Kelley. <br><br>The letter Kelley wrote outlines seven questions a reporter at USA TODAY, Mark Memmott, "will probably ask you" to verify the story. Kelley provides the answer to each question. <br><br>During a subsequent phone conversation with Memmott, the comments of "Abou Adam" were consistent with the script. <br><br>Even so, the newspaper traveled to Israel to try to find Shapiro. But in failing to find him, reporters learned that no detail of Shapiro's life — contained in the story or offered by Kelley in interviews — could be verified.<br><br>Israeli authorities say they have no record of an Avi Shapiro who fits the description Kelley offered. Hebron, where the settler community is close-knit, has no record either. Shin Bet looked into the alleged incident after Kelley's story and found it had no merit, says Daniel Seaman, a government spokesman. <br><br>Israel's National Police, questioned by another news outlet about the incident just after Kelley's story, could find no record of a complaint either, even though Palestinians in the Hebron area logged about 250 other complaints in the preceding nine months. <br><br>The Palestinian State Information Service also found no record of the incident. Shortly before Kelley's story, however, The Jerusalem Post reported Jewish terrorists were suspected of four shootings against Palestinians on area roads since mid-June.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-03-19-sources_x.htm" target="top">www.usatoday.com/news/2004-03-19-sources_x.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=newkid@rigorousintuition>NewKid</A> at: 7/7/06 4:35 am<br></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Iraq

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest