Rangel's parade?

Moderators: DrVolin, Elvis, Jeff

Rangel's parade?

Postby heath7 » Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:28 pm

What's up with this?<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8248236/" target="top">Rangel: Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>This is the third story I've read today regarding Conyers' DSM hearing that headlines Rep. Rangel as the force behind it. <br><br>Any guesses why the popular media is addressing it this way?<br><br>I've considered that, possibly, Rangel is slightly more noteworthy to Americans than Conyers, and perhaps the press is trying lamely to give this thing wheels.<br><br>I've thought more likely, because Rangel is one of those Democrats that isn't antiwar, that he'd be regarded as less serious about this matter than Conyers. Even in the hearing today Rangel said something to the effect that he'd <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>always</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> go to war for America. I can't remember the exact quote, but it sounded out of place.<br><br>Any guesses? <p></p><i></i>
heath7
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 9:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Rangel's parade?

Postby Camino Real » Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:08 am

He is senior democrat on the House Ways and Means committee, so maybe this is why, perhaps he just has pull with the press...... <p></p><i></i>
Camino Real
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 2:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I don't trust Rangel

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:30 am

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.iapprovethismessiah.com/2004/04/rangel-letter-recognizes-far-right.html" target="top">Here's</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> a letter of Rangel's praising Moon:<br><br>"Be it known...I, CHARLES B. RANGEL, Member of Congress, 15th Congressional District, by the power and authority vested in me, this 16th day of April, 2004, do recognize you as "True Parents" exemplifying self-giving service and leadership and as "King of Peace" in the key areas of reconciliation and peacemaking over fifty (50) years."<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.gorenfeld.net/images/letter.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Rangel

Postby anon » Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:06 am

Thank you for that info Jeff. You are something else.<br><br>I don't trust Rangel either. He speaks very well, but out of both sides of his mouth. <p></p><i></i>
anon
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 7:27 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

plus

Postby glubglubglub » Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:51 pm

Rangel = much easier to discredit than conyers, so if it's framed as coming from him so much the better for you-know-who. <p></p><i></i>
glubglubglub
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Iraq

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest