Britain to the Hague?

Moderators: DrVolin, 82_28, Elvis, Jeff

re:suggestions

Postby rain » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:07 pm

John, your R.I. works just fine.<br>the whoops - 'Why did they... lower.'<br>remember - 'when fighting dragons, not to...'<br>or to put it another way - 'wise as..., gentle as ...'<br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

hey rain,i missed not ignored your comment

Postby hmm » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:12 pm

i guess i didnt see the hmm to mean me till i returned to the thread (i shouldnt have chosen this name heh)<br>Thanks for the compliment and the thought.<br>To answer your question,i "felt" it was so based on what i have read in the past and it took me 5 minutes to make the connection with google.My main "secret" is i also try to read what my "enemies" have to say.<br>Why others havent made connections like this?they dont want to.<br>Juan Cole comes pretty close to saying it in print but those that do come under strong attack.<br>Fitzgerald's thing has the potential to be explosive as it also leads to part of what i'm suggesting but i seriously doubt it will be allowed to exceed predetermined parameters (if that makes any sense)<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
hmm
 
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

re: hey...

Postby rain » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:24 pm

thanks hmm. yes that makes perfect sense (unfortunately). even if/when he shows his cards that would only take care of one head, certainly not the whole beast. maybe one way I was thinking about was in terms of playing for time.<br>not the only one maybe. did you see the pic of shrubby and the new appointee.<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

What this means

Postby antiaristo » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:29 pm

"British soldiers face prosecution for the war crime of inhuman treatment of detainees, although the men will face court martial in this country rather than being tried in The Hague."<br><br>Do I really have to spell out what is going on here? British courts and British judges, Treason Felony Act?<br>She'll control the whole thing. Just like the Lloyds litigation.<br>In the UK the Iraq conquest was legitimate because she says it was legitimate. That is the context in which these prosecutionns will be enacted.<br><br>Just like everything else she offers, this is bad faith, a fake. Get to know the difference. <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

re: what this means

Postby rain » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:51 pm

yes we know, well, at least I do. and in all likelihood, very soon it'll be the whole of Europe, unless a few other people get their act together.<br>constructive critique. <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

antiaristo,in relation to the content you are posting

Postby hmm » Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:06 pm

i owe you an apology,i have been wrestling in my mind for a few days about how to reply to any of many posts you have made recently,but this doesnt help you as my mental dilemmas dont leave much of an impression on "the internets" unless i vocalise them.You see in many ways i agree with what you are pointing out,or "know" it.<br>but you are also breaking certain rules,the law wasnt made to be used in the way you are using it,you arent supposed to write letters to public figures in the way you do.The law is a method of control and letters to public figures are to invite them to cut ribbons at a local sporting event.<br>If you actually learn the law of the land and try to use it against those who ARE the law you leave them only extra-legal means as a remedy against you if you become too successful.<br>England is one of a few "constitutional monarchies" in Europe that pretend to be democracies untill you take a close look at the fine details of the law.<br>The best way a outsider or uninformed but interested person can get a glimpse of this in the media is during those deadly boring ceremonies they sometimes show on TV when they get some geriatric "constitutional expert" on to explain to us that the words we just heard that queen say, or the oath that was just sworn by some official, didnt REALLY literally mean what we just heard them say with our own ears.<br>When it takes a learned expert to explain to me that what i just heard wasnt really what i just heard well... you get my point.<br>I'll say just one thing more,if you are seriously interested in the english queen you are missing something if you do not examine that other powerful queen in europe, the dutch queen.<br>Sorry for the rambling nature of my post but i hope it clarifies my silence,i'm not scared of satan or the cia but people who write letters to officials about the queen of england hehe <p></p><i></i>
hmm
 
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Wrestling

Postby antiaristo » Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:03 pm

hmm,<br>I have my ideas about the Bilderberg Queen, but she is not my focus.<br>She holds neither the Bomb nor the Veto nor the American Congress.<br>She did not attack me on 27 May 1994.<br>I understand your reticence, but I really have no choice in the matter.<br>They have pursued extra-legal means in the past.<br>They've "shot their bolt" in that respect. That is their dilemma. They don't want to pay the price.<br>Why should I solve their dilemma? <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Spooks monitoring R.I.

Postby antiaristo » Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:56 am

See. It's happened again<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1532875,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/busine...75,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Gerry Robinson plans to show who's the boss <br><br>Ex-Granada chief target underperforming firms <br><br>Heather Tomlinson<br>Thursday July 21, 2005<br>The Guardian <br><br>Sir Gerry Robinson, the former head of Granada and star of the BBC television series I'll Show Them Who's Boss, is making a comeback with plans to target and take over large, underperforming businesses.<br><br><br>THIS IS ONE OF THE GUYS I NAMED IN MY SECOND AFFIDAVIT<br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessage?topicID=7.topic">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...ID=7.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Post 140 para 34<br><br><br>34 When Hollick tried to cheat me in May 1994 I advised him he was cheating the wrong man. That I always deliver, the bigger the stakes the better. In MAI's affidavit (none was ever sworn by the defendant, Anglia Television) I was told I was boasting. Now GranadaCompass PLC, and in particular Gerry Robinson and Charles Allen, do not want to do business with John Cleary. They refuse to acknowledge me or the debt they owe me. Nor will they acknowledge the additional crimes they commit with the passage of the month end. Anglia Television, Granada Television, GranadaCompass PLC and the Directors of each think they can cheat John Cleary. The wise man learns from the mistakes of others.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to Iraq

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests