Iraq's Child Prisoners

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Iraq's Child Prisoners

Postby professorpan » Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:35 am

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/080405S.shtml">www.truthout.org/docs_2005/080405S.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> Iraq's Child Prisoners <br> By Neil Mackay <br> The Sunday Herald<br><br> Sunday 01 August 2004<br><br>A Sunday Herald investigation has discovered that coalition forces are holding more than 100 children in jails such as Abu Ghraib. Witnesses claim that the detainees - some as young as 10 - are also being subjected to rape and torture.<br><br>It was early last October that Kasim Mehaddi Hilas says he witnessed the rape of a boy prisoner aged about 15 in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. "The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets," he said in a statement given to investigators probing prisoner abuse in Abu Ghraib. "Then, when I heard the screaming I climbed the door ... and I saw [the soldier's name is deleted] who was wearing a military uniform." Hilas, who was himself threatened with being sexually assaulted in Abu Ghraib, then describes in horrific detail how the soldier raped "the little kid".<br><br>In another witness statement, passed to the Sunday Herald, former prisoner Thaar Salman Dawod said: "[I saw] two boys naked and they were cuffed together face to face and [a US soldier] was beating them and a group of guards were watching and taking pictures and there was three female soldiers laughing at the prisoners. The prisoners, two of them, were young."<br><br>It's not certain exactly how many children are being held by coalition forces in Iraq, but a Sunday Herald investigation suggests there are up to 107. Their names are not known, nor is where they are being kept, how long they will be held or what has happened to them during their detention.<br><br>Proof of the widespread arrest and detention of children in Iraq by US and UK forces is contained in an internal UNICEF report written in June. The report has - surprisingly - not been made public. A key section on child protection, headed "Children in Conflict with the Law or with Coalition Forces", reads: "In July and August 2003, several meetings were conducted with CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority) ... and Ministry of Justice to address issues related to juvenile justice and the situation of children detained by the coalition forces ... UNICEF is working through a variety of channels to try and learn more about conditions for children who are imprisoned or detained, and to ensure that their rights are respected."<br><br>Another section reads: "Information on the number, age, gender and conditions of incarceration is limited. In Basra and Karbala children arrested for alleged activities targeting the occupying forces are reported to be routinely transferred to an internee facility in Um Qasr. The categorisation of these children as 'internees' is worrying since it implies indefinite holding without contact with family, expectation of trial or due process."<br><br>The report also states: "A detention centre for children was established in Baghdad, where according to ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) a significant number of children were detained. UNICEF was informed that the coalition forces were planning to transfer all children in adult facilities to this 'specialised' child detention centre. In July 2003, UNICEF requested a visit to the centre but access was denied. Poor security in the area of the detention centre has prevented visits by independent observers like the ICRC since last December.<br><br>"The perceived unjust detention of Iraqi males, including youths, for suspected activities against the occupying forces has become one of the leading causes for the mounting frustration among Iraqi youths and the potential for radicalisation of this population group."<br><br>Journalists in Germany have also been investigating the detention and abuse of children in Iraq. One reporter, Thomas Reutter of the TV programme Report Mainz, interviewed a US army sergeant called Samuel Provance, who is banned from speaking about his six months stationed in Abu Ghraib but told Reutter of how one 16-year-old Iraqi boy was arrested.<br><br>"He was terribly afraid," Provance said. "He had the skinniest arms I've ever seen. He was trembling all over. His wrists were so thin we couldn't even put handcuffs on him. Right when I saw him for the first time, and took him for interrogation, I felt sorry for him."<br><br>"The interrogation specialists poured water over him and put him into a car. Then they drove with him through the night, and at that time it was very, very cold. Then they smeared him with mud and showed him to his father, who was also in custody. They had tried out other interrogation methods on him, but he wasn't to be brought to talk. The interrogation specialists told me, after the father had seen his son in this state, his heart broke. He wept and promised to tell them everything they wanted to know."<br><br>An Iraqi TV reporter Suhaib Badr-Addin al-Baz saw the Abu Ghraib children's wing when he was arrested by Americans while making a documentary. He spent 74 days in Abu Ghraib.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"I saw a camp for children there," he said. "Boys, under the age of puberty. There were certainly hundreds of children in this camp."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Al-Baz said he heard a 12-year-old girl crying. Her brother was also held in the jail. One night guards came into her cell. "She was beaten," said al-Baz. "I heard her call out, 'They have undressed me. They have poured water over me.'"<br><br>He says he heard her cries and whimpering daily - this, in turn, caused other prisoners to cry as they listened to her. Al-Baz also told of an ill 15-year-old boy who was soaked repeatedly with hoses until he collapsed. Guards then brought in the child's father with a hood over his head. The boy collapsed again.<br><br>Although most of the children are held in US custody, the Sunday Herald has established that some are held by the British Army. British soldiers tend to arrest children in towns like Basra, which are under UK control, then hand the youngsters over to the Americans who interrogate them and detain them.<br><br>Between January and May this year the Red Cross registered a total of 107 juveniles in detention during 19 visits to six coalition prisons. The aid organisation's Rana Sidani said they had no complete information about the ages of those detained, or how they had been treated. The deteriorating security situation has prevented the Red Cross visiting all detention centres.<br><br>Amnesty International is outraged by the detention of children. It is aware of "numerous human rights violations against Iraqi juveniles, including detentions, torture and ill-treatment, and killings". Amnesty has interviewed former detainees who say they've seen boys as young as 10 in Abu Ghraib.<br><br>The organisation's leaders have called on the coalition governments to give concrete information on how old the children are, how many are detained, why and where they are being held, and in what circumstances they are being detained. They also want to know if the children have been tortured.<br><br>Alistair Hodgett, media director of Amnesty International USA, said the coalition forces needed to be "transparent" about their policy of child detentions, adding: "Secrecy is one thing that rings alarm bells." Amnesty was given brief access to one jail in Mosul, he said, but has been repeatedly turned away from all others. He pointed out that even countries "which don't have good records", such as Libya, gave Amnesty access to prisons. "Denying access just fuels the rumour mill," he said.<br><br>Hodgett added that British and US troops should not be detaining any Iraqis - let alone children - following the recent handover of power. "They should all be held by Iraqi authorities," he said. "When the coalition handed over Saddam they should have handed over the other 3000 detainees."<br><br>The British Ministry of Defence confirmed UK forces had handed over prisoners to US troops, but a spokesman said he did not know the ages of any detainees given to the Americans.<br><br>The MoD also admitted it was currently holding one prisoner aged under 18 at Shaibah prison near Um Qasr. Since the invasion Britain has detained, and later released, 65 under-18s. The MoD claimed the ICRC had access to British jails and detainee lists.<br><br>High-placed officials in the Pentagon and Centcom told the Sunday Herald that children as young as 14 were being held by US forces. "We do have juveniles detained," a source said. "They have been detained as they are deemed to be a threat or because they have acted against the coalition or Iraqis."<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Officially, the Pentagon says it is holding "around 60 juvenile detainees primarily aged 16 and 17," although when it was pointed out that the Red Cross estimate is substantially higher, a source admitted "numbers may have gone up, we might have detained more kids."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Officials would not comment about children under the age of 16 being held prisoner. Sources said: "It's a real challenge ascertaining their ages. Unlike the UK or the US, they don't have IDs or birth certificates." The Sunday Herald has been told, however, that at least five children aged under 16 are being kept at Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca.<br><br>A highly placed source in the Pentagon said: "We have done investigations into accusations of juveniles being abused and raped and can't find anything that resembles that."<br><br>The Pentagon's official policy is to segregate juvenile prisoners from the rest of the prison population, and allow young inmates to join family members also being detained. "Our main concern is that they are not abused or harassed by older detainees. We know they need special treatment," an official said.<br><br>Pentagon sources said they were unaware how long child prisoners were kept in jail but said their cases were reviewed every 90 days. The last review was early last month. The sources confirmed the children had been questioned and interrogated when initially detained, but could not say whether this was "an adult-style interrogation."<br><br>The Norwegian government, which is part of the "coalition of the willing," has already said it will tell the US that the alleged torture of children is intolerable. Odd Jostein Sæter, parliamentary secretary at the Norwegian prime minister's office, said: "Such assaults are unacceptable. It is against international laws and it is also unacceptable from a moral point of view. This is why we react strongly ... We are addressing this in a very severe and direct way and present concrete demands. This is damaging the struggle for democracy and human rights in Iraq."<br><br>In Denmark, which is also in the coalition, Save the Children called on its government to tell the occupying forces to order the immediate release of child detainees. Neals Hurdal, head of the Danish Save the Children, said the y had heard rumours of children in Basra being maltreated in custody since May.<br><br>Human Rights Watch (HRW) said it was "extremely disturbed" that the coalition was holding children for long periods in jails notorious for torture. HRW also criticised the policy of categorising children as "security detainees," saying this did not give carte blanche for them to be held indefinitely. HRW said if there was evidence the children had committed crimes then they should be tried in Iraqi courts, otherwise they should be returned to their families.<br><br>UNICEF is "profoundly disturbed" by reports of children being abused in coalition jails. Alexandra Yuster, UNICEF's senior adviser on child detention, said that under international law children should be detained only as a last resort and only then for the shortest possible time.<br><br>They should have access to lawyers and their families, be kept safe, healthy, educated, well-fed and not be subjected to any form of mental or physical punishment, she added. UNICEF is now "desperately" trying to get more information on the fate of the children currently detained in coalition jails. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

More

Postby professorpan » Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:43 am

I've posted some further commentary about this gruesome subject:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.charm.net/~profpan/2005/08/children-of-abu-ghraib.html">www.charm.net/~profpan/20...hraib.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I'm also reading through the FOIA documents the ACLU got their hands on, especially the Karpinsky material. There are plenty of little hints of darker goings-on -- I'll post after I compile my thoughts. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

...

Postby Ted the dog » Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:45 pm

crazy stuff...just figured I'd bump it up in case anyone missed it. <p></p><i></i>
Ted the dog
 
Posts: 275
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 6:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Crazy indeed

Postby professorpan » Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:44 pm

Found this on the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://sadlyno.com/">"Sadly, No!"</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> blog this afternoon:<br><br>Sadly, No!<br><br>Dr. Condoleezza Rice, October 8, 2003:<br>"Saddam would have remained in power -- with all that entails: More mass graves, more children in prison, and more daily depredations of the Iraqi people."<br><br>President Bush, April 16, 2003:<br>"Two weeks ago, the Iraqi regime operated a gulag for dissidents, and incredibly enough, a prison for young children."<br><br>President Bush, July 10, 2003:<br>"We discovered a prison for children -- all aimed at -- for Saddam Hussein to intimidate the people of Iraq." <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=professorpan>professorpan</A> at: 8/5/05 4:48 pm<br></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

not today it won't

Postby AnnaLivia » Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:14 am

In rememory<br><br>of the child victims<br>in Iraq and around the globe,<br>this thread will not fall from the front page. <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

tears that just don't stop coming

Postby AnnaLivia » Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:59 pm

My own offspring are on the computer today, so I’m not getting much chance…and I see there is heavy traffic here today, as well. I don’t want to bump down active discussions, and don’t mean to be rude or disruptive, so this will be the last time I do this.<br><br>But, just once more, I post to this thread in deepest grief and in determined memoriam for the child victims whose suffering we should not be allowed to ignore or forget.<br><br>While their own mothers are powerless to protect them from the horrors my tax dollars are providing to them, I will scream it out from the rooftops.<br><br>I also saw what fintan dunne said about jeff when he listed this site as fake/CIA.<br><br> “the pedophile-story-obsessed Jeff Wells”<br><br>Oh yeah, that Jeff Wells; what a fool, what a fake, what a complete nutter. Imagine anyone wasting all that concern, time, and effort on a little bitty old thing like the victims of pedophilia or ritual abuse. Jeez, can’t he find something IMPORTANT to harp about?<br> <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

re: In Rememory Also of Child Victims Everywhere ...

Postby Starman » Tue Aug 09, 2005 4:07 pm

Following Anna Livia's inspired example, I too would like to see this issue get the attention it deserves, and so make this modest effort to bump this thread back onto the first-page from the third, where the press of recent posting new topics has relegated it.<br><br>To whit:<br><br>"An Iraqi TV reporter Suhaib Badr-Addin al-Baz saw the Abu Ghraib children's wing when he was arrested by Americans while making a documentary. He spent 74 days in Abu Ghraib."<br><br>My heart just bursts with Pride when I think of how truly Blessed I am to live in a Country so Blessed by Gawd and dedicated to the principles of Democracy and Civil and Human Rights -- and where our Glorious Triumphant Soldiers valiantly pay the highest tribute to America and God (not necessarily in that order) by doing their Sacred Duty in protecting our Precious Freedom and American Values, especially in their recognizing that any and all Threats to our way of life MUST be taken seriously, even if it requires kidnapping and imprisoning the children and Female Relations of Suspected Terrorists and Other Designated Bad Guys, and detaining fanatic Muslim enemy children and subjecting them to torture and brutal treatment in order to turn them from their evil ways, and to milk them of every scrap of important Intelligence they can that might save the lives of our Noble Fighters and of our Americanized Iraqi allies, in order to help make the Dream of Freedom and Civil Society become true for the poor suffering deluded and exploited people of Iraq who have been so cruely misled and decieved by their religious bigot Authorities and the ruthless dictator Saddam Hussein which the US under Republican Leadership has from the very beginning of Time always and passionately objected to and wanted to prevent him getting into power ever since he and his despicable violent Ba'athe Party seized power from Iraq's legitimate government which was a trusted ally of America, while the CIA was prevented by liberal cowards in Congress from helping to prevent Saddam seizing power, violating International Law and becoming a criminal Pariah that Reagan and Bush 41 rightly condemned and refused to recognize, and did everything in the Power to Undermine and Thwart.<br>(X-treme revisionist cynical-sarcasm filter on)<br>*****<br><br>In a not-unrelated recent development that is entirely reflective of the Bush Criminal War Syndicate's fascination with technology designed to kill, maim, destroy, devastate, disrupt, brutalize, butcher, mutilate and otherwise inflict horrible pain and suffering and terror, I learned today that the Pentagon is pushing to develop a 'new' generation of landmines -- Waaaay-to-Go-Team,-Yeah!<br>[Fuckin' Madness, etc...]<br><br>I fear what we have is a crisis of Imagination, largely not acknowledged -- Collectively, the aspirations, dreams, hopes, strivings of our society have been hijacked and derailed by basically Doddering Old (White)Men Fools entirely given to deluded fantasies about their National Importance in 'serving' the needs and interests of the Nation -- combining War with Business and skimming their commission off the top ...<br><br>This is the most irresponsible, self-centered US Administration of which I'm aware, who feel themselves so above and beyond the Law they hardly even bother to refrain from the appearance of impropriety, as these briggands and murderers, thieves and frauds have repeatedly shown their complicity in some of the most despicable scams and crimes of our age.<br><br>An aspect of this is the White House's resistance to any legislation calling for rquiring that all US military prisoners be treated in accordance with Geneva Convention guidelines. What I STILL find remarkable is that the Bush Administration contends that it has the authority to 'exempt' Military and Intelligence interrogators and Military Police etc. from prohibitions against cruel treatment and torture. The 'debate' about how America's prsioners should be treated has been horribly corrupted by ommissions and distortions and what sure looks like the most grevious abuse of power -- as there's almost no acknowledgement by the press or the Pentagon or the White House that there are more than a dozen prisons in Iraq beside Abu Ghraib where horrible, outrageous abuses have been documented, and concerning the US's ongoing policy of kidnapping and torture-by-proxy through renditions, and the holding of hundreds of women and children in appalling, dehumanizing conditions absent all legal rights and due-process -- I'm just so disgusted at the typical American public's disinterest and unawareness of these issues -- How to account for such a widespread attitude of disengagement and suspension of outrage? This is a fundamental failure of moral integrity which is at core a symptom of America's crisis of legitimacy.<br><br>from:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29758">ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29758</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>It's That Pesky Prisoner Abuse Scandal Again<br>by William Fisher, Aug. 2, 2005<br><br>--excerpt--<br>Picking up consideration of the defence bill -- which includes 50 billion dollars for U.S. troops in Iraq -- is likely to cause widespread White House heartburn. Lively debate was already well underway when Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Republican from Tennessee, abruptly pulled the bill from consideration. <br><br>The reason was White House hostility to amendments setting standards for the treatment of enemy prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and other military detention centres. The White House let it be known that the president would veto the defence-spending legislation if this provision was included in final legislation. <br><br>But White House angst about this amendment does not come from the usual suspects -- the Democrats. Its authors are leading Republicans, including Arizona Sen. John McCain, a former Vietnam prisoner of war, Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, a former military judge, and Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the powerful chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. <br><br>McCain had been working with Graham and with Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, to respond to widely publicised cases of prisoner abuse. They proposed to set specific standards for the treatment of foreign detainees. <br><br>The McCain-Graham-Warner amendment would require that the U.S. Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation cover prisoners in military custody. <br><br>McCain said, ”The Army Field Manual and its various editions have served America well, through wars against both regular and irregular foes. I think we all agree to fight terrorism we must obtain intelligence.” <br><br>(Well-- I take exception here, as incredible abuses and war-crime atrocities have occurred in nearly every war or conflict the US has been involved in the last 50+ years, for which those soldiers and more importantly their commanders weren't held accountable, despite prohibitions on these kinds of treatment of detainees, suspected 'enemies' and prisoners and even civilians written into 'law' and the US Army Field manual -- <br><br>Something is VERY, VERY wrong within our Military system and in our legal establishment, it's like the 2-ton elephant in the living-room no-one is willing to acknowledge -- it goes to the heart of America as a Nation lacking moral courage and the conviction of belief in basic principles, reflected in its 'leadership' and institutions. Perhaps the most notable feature of America's policies and 'leadership' is the degree to which hypocrisy has become institutionalized -- my personal 'pet-peeve' that I just can't stand. -S)<br><br>”But we have to ensure that it is reliable and acquired in a way that is humane. To do otherwise not only offends our national morals but undermines our efforts to protect the nation's security.” <br><br>Together with Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, they also introduced an amendment that would prohibit cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment of prisoners and would require the United States to abide by the Geneva Convention and other international agreements on the treatment of prisoners. <br><br>The two amendments would probably have received substantial Democratic support, giving them a strong chance of passing in the Republican-controlled Senate. <br><br>McCain, a leading sponsor of the interrogation-standard amendment, said, ”We need to make sure that every member of the Department of Defence understands the procedures that are being used in interrogation and we don't have a repetition of Abu Ghraib,” referring to the prison in Iraq that became synonymous with detainee abuse. Rachel Meeropol, an attorney with the Centre for Constitutional Rights, told IPS, ”The administration's actions in authorising and condoning torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment are clearly illegal, and contrary to American ideals.” ”Continuing to ignore the abuses being carried out puts detainees, American soldiers, and even all of us at home in jeopardy. It is long past time to act, and the American people should demand a thorough inquiry, all the way up the chain of command. ” ”These senators sent a message that until the Senate deals directly with the issues of interrogation and detainee treatment, the DOD bill will not get through the Senate,” said Elisa Massimino, Washington director of Human Rights First, a group advocating stricter rules for handling prisoners. <br><br>Pressure on the senators to back off came from Vice Pres. Dick Cheney, among others. The White House issued a policy statement saying, ”The administration strongly opposes such amendments, which would interfere with the protection of Americans from terrorism by diverting resources from the war to answer unnecessary or duplicative inquiry or by restricting the president's ability to conduct the war effectively under existing law.” <br><br>In support of his amendment, McCain read from a Jul. 22 letter signed by 14 retired military officers, including Marine Gen. Joseph Hoar, the former commander of U.S. Central Command, and Rear Adm. John D. Hutson, the Navy's judge advocate general from 1997 to 2000. <br><br>”The abuse of prisoners hurts America's cause in the war on terror, endangers U.S. service members who might be captured by the enemy and is anathema to the values Americans have held dear for generations,” the letter stated. <br><br>A third amendment was introduced by Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, to set up an independent commission to study reports of abuse at military detention facilities. Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and chairman of the powerful Judiciary Committee, said he was considering support for an independent investigation. <br><br>Sentiment favouring such an investigation has slowly been gathering steam in Congress, since legislation was introduced last January by Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. <br><br>Sen. Graham charged that the White House and the Pentagon had issued confusing and contradictory directives regarding detainee treatment. <br><br>”Our people are trained to do it one way; you're confusing the heck out of them. And what have we learned in the last two years? If you know what the rules are about interrogating anybody, come tell me, because I can't figure it out,” he said. <br><br>The White House view was articulated by conservative Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, who said, ”I reject the idea that this Defence Department and our Army and our military is out of control, is confused about what their powers and duties and responsibilities are.” (END/2005) <br>****<br>And so it goes ...<br><br>Starman<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Starman
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Iraq

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests