by antiaristo » Mon Apr 10, 2006 5:59 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway<br><br>While i'd be the first to criticize the nazi US allignments who turned Israel into the hell it is now, let us not forget who are the "new and improved" anti war germans and <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>english people</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->...<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Please do not blame the English.<br>The English are the captives of the Scots.<br>The Scottish Raj rules Westminster and Whitehall.<br>Next time you hear that well known cunt Sir Sean Connery spitting his poison about the English, remember it is HIS crowd that call the shots in London.<br>It is HIS hands that are covered in blood.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The laws in England are different to the laws in Scotland.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>But first.<br><br>Let me explain how I feel about these people.<br><br>Imagine you were dining with about twelve others at a very expensive restaurant.<br>They hold you down, and tie your hands behind your back.<br>You are forced to eat, using only your mouth.<br><br>They spend the next four hours talking to each other about you.<br>About how you drool, have the manners of a pig, are stupid and worthless. They laugh all the time and tell each other how much better they are than you, how much more refined.<br><br>They talk about how your mother and father must have taught you to slob like that.<br>I could go on…<br><br>Then they walk out and leave you to pay the bill for all.<br><br>That is the position in which Elizabeth Windsor thought she had me.<br><br>But I escaped from her and her court.<br><br>She then tried to murder me. Then again. And again.<br>But I kept one step ahead of her.<br><br>Now, twelve years later, the shoe is on the other foot.<br>Elizabeth Windsor is dead. May she rot in hell.<br><br>Connery was one of her filthy Freemasons. His forte is badmouthing the English.<br>He is a well-known cunt, like those other well known cunts Philip Shepherd (ex QC) and John Rogers QC.<br>The ones she thought had tied my hands behind me.<br><br>Connery was her man in Hollywood.<br>He too will rot in hell.<br><br><br>Definition: “English” means those born in England and those who live there.<br><br><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:small;">The laws in England are different to the laws in Scotland.</span><!--EZCODE FONT END--><br><br>Let’s just remind ourselves of what happened last July 22.<br>The British misidentified Jean Charles de Menezes.<br>They thought he was Hussain Osman.<br>A black Englishman.<br><br>They followed him as he made his way to work. He was wearing light clothes – jeans and jean jacket.<br>He entered a Tube station, picked up a free newspaper, used his Oyster travelcard at the turnstile, and went and sat on a train.<br><br>Suddenly he was confronted by a horde of maniacs.<br>He was pushed down into his seat, bewildered, his arms pinned to his side by one of the maniacs.<br>Another maniac came alongside and pointed a gun at his head.<br><br>He shoots eleven times. Seven times into the head and one in the shoulder.<br>A ritual assassination, one bullet every three seconds, lasting in all more than thirty seconds.<br><br>They did that because they thought he was an Englishman, living in England.<br>They can’t do it in Scotland.<br><br>This is what was decided more than seven months after those events.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:small;">British police backs shoot to kill policy, despite killing of innocent man</span><!--EZCODE FONT END-->(Updated 05:28 p.m.)<br><br>2006/3/8<br>LONDON (AP) <br><br>Police chiefs on Wednesday defended their policy on using lethal force against suspected suicide bombers, despite the killing of a Brazilian man who police mistook for a terrorist in London last year. <br><br>The Association of Chief Police Officers in <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>England, Wales and Northern Ireland</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> drew up the policy in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, producing Operation Kratos, a strategy that involves police marksmen shooting suicide bomb suspects in the head with no warning to stop them detonating bombs. <br><br>The group reviewed the policy after undercover police mistakenly shot and killed Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year-old electrician, on a London subway on July 22. The shooting occurred one day after four men had attempted to bomb the capital's transport system and two weeks after a suicide attack on the system had killed 52 commuters and four bombers. <br><br>London's police have apologized for killing de Menezes by shooting him in the head seven times. <br><br>The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) recently completed an investigation into the killing of de Menezes, which could theoretically lead to the prosecution of police officers. Results of the probe have not been released yet. <br><br>Shami Chakrabarti, director of the Liberty civil rights group, criticized the police chiefs' report, saying it would do nothing to improve public confidence in the policy. <br><br>"It is certainly not going to build my confidence at this point for the police to be <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>secretly reviewing their own policy and then issuing a ringing endorsement</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> when we haven't even heard the outcome of the Menezes inquiry," she told British Broadcasting Corp. radio. <br><br>The police chiefs' announcement came as Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was in Britain on a state visit. He was likely to raise the issue of de Menezes, whose killing sparked intense criticism in Brazil. <br><br>The police chiefs' association said it was awaiting the results of that IPCC investigation, but decided to review the Operation Kratos policy and announce its endorsement of it now. <br><br>"I am pleased that the existing policy has been deemed <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>fit for purpose</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> and we now await any IPCC recommendations," association president <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sir</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Chris Fox said in a statement. <br><br>"The police service has an overriding duty to protect life, and occasionally, in discharging its duty, force is used. Very rarely officers, in order to save life, may have to take life." <br><br>Fox said the IPCC ruling could require another review of the policy, but "<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>we felt it necessary to be sure we have tactics available to us that we can use in the face of extreme threat</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> and this review was therefore undertaken." <br><br>"Police officers <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>faced with a threat</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> have to identify and assess the threat and manage it. They must then use only such force as is <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>proportionate in the circumstances</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->... Where it is <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>absolutely necessary</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, lethal force might have to be used," Fox said. <br><br>Lawyers for the de Menezes family criticized the police chiefs' conclusion. <br><br>"<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Until Jean Charles de Menezes was deliberately killed, no one knew that police in this country had secretly introduced for themselves, without any democratic debate or approval, a `shoot to kill' policy</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->," the lawyers said in a statement. <br>"Now ACPO seeks to reinstate the secret policy publicly before any inquiry into the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes is completed, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>confident that police can hide behind the claim that a criminal investigation is still under way</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->."<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.chinapost.com.tw/p_latestdetail.asp?id=36192">www.chinapost.com.tw/p_la...p?id=36192</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I have used the China Post because the Western sources do not mention some of those things I have highlighted.<br><br>Like the fact that the policy covers only England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>They can’t do it in Scotland.<br>Because of the Scottish Parliament.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:small;">Legislative Powers of the Scottish Parliament</span><!--EZCODE FONT END--><br>·        <br>Devolved matters: all subjects which are not explicitly stated in the Scotland Act as reserved matters are automatically devolved to the Scottish Parliament. Most importantly, this includes agriculture, fisheries and forestry, economic development, education, environment, food standards, health, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>home affairs, law - courts, police</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> & fire services, local government, sport and the arts, transport, training, tourism, research and statistics and social work. The Scottish Parliament has the ability to alter income tax, in Scotland, by up to 3 pence in the pound.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Parliament">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sco...Parliament</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>In every one of those areas the law in Scotland is different to the law in England.<br><br>And in every one of those areas the provision of services is superior to that in England.<br><br>Because England has no parliament.<br><br>But I want to concentrate on Justice here.<br><br>The powers exercised by Ediburgh on behalf of the Scottish people are exercised by Westminster on behalf of the English people.<br><br>Westminster is the parliament of the United Kingdom as a whole.<br><br>In theory the politician responsible is the Home Secretary. Charles Clarke.<br><br>Remember, an “Englishman” has been murdered by the Metropolitan Police.<br><br>How does Clarke carry out his responsibilities?<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Home Office has said Operation Kratos was a matter for the police, but it is not clear who in Whitehall would have been aware of the change in tactics.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,,1567370,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/attack...70,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Charles Clarke is far too busy prostituting himself to have any concerns for the corpse of Jean Charles de Menezes<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Breakfast with Clarke prompts 'cash for access' row <br><br>Matthew Tempest and Oliver King<br>Friday April 7, 2006 <br><br><br>Labour was tonight involved in another cash row, as a new business group was revealed to be offering access to cabinet ministers in return for donations to the Labour party.<br>London in Business, an offshoot of the Labour party business liaison unit, is offering businesses the chance to have breakfasts and lunches with government ministers in return for subscriptions of thousands of pounds a year.<br><br>Business people have so far been offered a chance to network with the home secretary, Charles Clarke, and the transport secretary, Alistair Darling, in return for between £2,000 and £3,500 a year.<br><br>Mr Clarke's spokeswoman said that it was "absolutely ridiculous" to suggest that this was an example of "cash for access" and that it was "completely normal" practice. The chair of London in Business, Labour donor and property developer Kevin McGrath, said that businessmen paying to attend such events was entirely "normal" and that the first meeting had only raised "peanuts" for the party.<br><br>But with an hour-and-three-quarters' access to government ministers - rather than merely Labour politicians - on offer, it has prompted accusations of "cash for access" from political rivals.<br><br>Because the sums are below the £5,000 minimum, they do not need to be declared as a donation under electoral law.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,1749425,00.html">politics.guardian.co.uk/f...25,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>I think that is enough to absorb for the moment.<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>