why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

by **friend catcher** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:29 pm

Thankyou for the change of mind regarding my imagination friendcatcher, You have put on display both your lack of imagination and your ignorance. Please feel free to indulge your colourful imagination as much as you wish. Cameron's still an englishman Alastair Campbell who was the cause and focus of the Hutton report is of no interest to you because in spite of his name he's clearly English born and bred.That he was at the heart of things as far as British involvement goes doesn't interest you as he doesn't technicaly fit the rampaging blood soaked scotsman cartoon. Ming Campbell who is the just elected leader of the lib dems and had nothing to do with Iraq is part of the fiendish plot on account of his birth and some vague notion that they're all in it together. You have no argument. You have a phobia. I hope Jeff puts this thread in the dustbin where it belongs.

by **antiaristo** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:43 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>I hope Jeff puts this thread in the dustbin where it belongs.<hr></blockquote> Yes, I thought that was what you were up to. You cannot deal with the argument. Ming replaced Kennedy, no? Very slippery of you. (yes, lurkers, Kennedy is Scottish) Now I say you are deliberately trying to get this thread Fire-Pitted by starting a fight. I make this last challenge before I ask the moderator to look at what you are doing. Will you deal with the substance of my three questions, please?

by * » Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:07 pm

[ quote] I hope Jeff puts this thread in the dustbin where it belongs.[/quote] "Yes, I thought that was what you were up to." You are not the only one with that suspicion, antia. In my experience, it is usually the poster shouting "troll" who is the thread-derailer and this is no exception. If friendcatcher is so affronted by your posts and so concerned about his friends' exposure to coarse language, the simple solution is for him to avoid the offending threads and to caution his friends they risk exposure to the random swear. Some of us have learned much from antiaristo.....

by **friend catcher** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:28 pm

I really like RI and the board throws up many things I wouldn't have come across anywhere else. I'm still fascinated, like many I suspect, by Grave Mysteries. From that mind boggling work, to you, is literally the sublime to the ridiculous. I've done what I wanted to and made sure your version of a country you do not live in didn't go unchallenged. If any poor bastard has bothered following this dross then I apologise. As for you..... Eminem says it better " If I've offended you - good, I still don't give a fuck "

by **antiaristo** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:33 pm

Come on, friendcatcher. Be a sport. Is it Sir Sean? Is his ego really that big that he cannot stand the truth on some obscure board. You know, youve absolutely made my month. Thanks.

by **friend catcher** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:11 pm

As I post and review I see 1 tal has a view. Language, coarse or refined, was not an issue. Concepts of a racial coup being a motivating force in the the slide towards an agressive police state with worldwide delusions is an issue. Mainly because it's bollocks. If there is anything in anti's posts that has convinced you of a malign scottish cabal then put your convictions on the table. As for anti, I'm happy your month has been made with so little although your fantasy of me as Sean Connery is slightly creepy.

by **antiaristo** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:22 pm

friendcatcher, Are you going to answer or not?

by **friend catcher** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:34 pm

Feeding time's over.

by **slimmouse** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:35 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Concepts of a racial coup being a motivating force in the the slide towards an agressive police state with worldwide delusions is an issue.<hr></blockquote> Friend Catcher. I couldnt agree more. Racism is not the issue here. Its LAW. Scottish, American, Israeli, Martian, English - Who really gives a shit. Its the LAW thats the issue here, and how it has been manipulated to benefit the usual suspects. And I sincerely believe that you aint one of them <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"> Are you ?

by **antiaristo** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:40 pm

This thread has now been succesfully de-railed by friendcatcher, and I must call in the moderator. Jeff, I'm sorry to waste your time. But I have reason to believe friendcatcher is not acting in good faith. I want him to debate the questions I have put. But all I get in reply is invective and diversion. Would YOU please invite him to reply in good faith, or otherwise to leave. Thank you antiaristo

by **friend catcher** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:47 pm

Slimmouse, many thanks for the support. Starting to worry that everyone's insane but me which is never a good thought. Regards

by **antiaristo** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 5:59 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway While i'd be the first to criticize the nazi US allignments who turned Israel into the hell it is now, let us not forget who are the "new and improved" anti war germans and english people...<hr></blockquote> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Please do not blame the English. The English are the captives of the Scots. The Scottish Raj rules Westminster and Whitehall. Next time you hear that well known cunt Sir Sean Connery spitting his poison about the English, remember it is HIS crowd that call the shots in London. It is HIS hands that are covered in blood.<hr></blockquote> The laws in England are different to the laws in Scotland. But first. Let me explain how I feel about these people. Imagine you were dining with about twelve others at a very expensive restaurant. They hold you down, and tie your hands behind your back. You are forced to eat, using only your mouth. They spend the next four hours talking to each other about you. About how you drool, have the manners of a pig, are stupid and worthless. They laugh all the time and tell each other how much better they are than you, how much more refined. They talk about how your mother and father must have taught you to slob like that. I could go on… Then they walk out and leave you to pay the bill for all. That is the position in which Elizabeth Windsor thought she had me. But I escaped from her and her court. She then tried to murder me. Then again. And again. But I kept one step ahead of her. Now, twelve years later, the shoe is on the other foot. Elizabeth Windsor is dead. May she rot in hell. Connery was one of her filthy Freemasons. His forte is badmouthing the English. He is a well-known cunt, like those other well known cunts Philip Shepherd (ex QC) and John Rogers QC. The ones she thought had tied my hands behind me. Connery was her man in Hollywood. He too will rot in hell. Definition: “English” means those born in England and those who live there. The laws in England are different to the laws in Scotland. Let’s just remind ourselves of what happened last July 22. The British misidentified Jean Charles de Menezes. They thought he was Hussain Osman. A black Englishman. They followed him as he made his way to work. He was wearing light clothes – jeans and jean jacket. He entered a Tube station, picked up a free newspaper, used his Oyster travelcard at the turnstile, and went and sat on a train. Suddenly he was confronted by a horde of maniacs. He was pushed down into his seat, bewildered, his arms pinned to his side by one of the maniacs. Another maniac came alongside and pointed a gun at his head. He shoots eleven times. Seven times into the head and one in the shoulder. A ritual assassination, one bullet every three seconds, lasting in all more than thirty seconds. They did that because they thought he was an Englishman, living in England. They can’t do it in Scotland. This is what was decided more than seven months after those events. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>British police backs shoot to kill policy, despite killing of innocent man(Updated 05:28 p.m.) 2006/3/8 LONDON (AP) Police chiefs on Wednesday defended their policy on using lethal force against suspected suicide bombers, despite the killing of a Brazilian man who police mistook for a terrorist in London last year. The Association of Chief Police Officers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland drew up the policy in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, producing Operation Kratos, a strategy that involves police marksmen shooting suicide bomb suspects in the head with no warning to stop them detonating bombs. The group reviewed the policy after undercover police mistakenly shot and killed Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year-old electrician, on a London subway on July 22. The shooting occurred one day after four men had attempted to bomb the capital's transport system and two weeks after a suicide attack on the system had killed 52 commuters and four bombers. London's police have apologized for killing de Menezes by shooting him in the head seven times. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) recently completed an investigation into the killing of de Menezes, which could theoretically lead to the prosecution of police officers. Results of the probe have not been released yet. Shami Chakrabarti, director of the Liberty civil rights group, criticized the police chiefs' report, saying it would do nothing to improve public confidence in the policy. "It is certainly not going to build my confidence at this point for the police to be secretly reviewing their own policy and then issuing a ringing endorsement when we haven't even heard the outcome of the Menezes inquiry," she told British Broadcasting Corp. radio. The police chiefs' announcement came as Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was in Britain on a state visit. He was likely to raise the issue of de Menezes, whose killing sparked intense criticism in Brazil. The police chiefs' association said it was awaiting the results of that IPCC investigation, but decided to review the Operation Kratos policy and announce its endorsement of it now. "I am pleased that the existing policy has been deemed fit for purpose and we now await any IPCC recommendations," association president Sir Chris Fox said in a statement. "The police service has an overriding duty to protect life, and occasionally, in discharging its duty, force is used. Very rarely officers, in order to save life, may have to take life." Fox said the IPCC ruling could require another review of the policy, but "we felt it necessary to be sure we have tactics available to us that we can use in the face of extreme threat and this review was therefore undertaken." "Police officers faced with a threat have to identify and assess the threat and manage it. They must then use only such force as is proportionate in the circumstances... Where it is absolutely necessary, lethal force might have to be used," Fox said. Lawyers for the de Menezes family criticized the police chiefs' conclusion. "Until Jean Charles de Menezes was deliberately killed, no one knew that police in this country had secretly introduced for themselves, without any democratic debate or approval, a `shoot to kill' policy," the lawyers said in a statement. "Now ACPO seeks to reinstate the secret policy publicly before any inquiry into the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes is completed, confident that police can hide behind the claim that a criminal investigation is still under way."<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.chinapost.com.tw/p_latestdetail.asp?id=36192">www.chinapost.com.tw/p_la...p?id=36192</a> I have used the China Post because the Western sources do not mention some of those things I have highlighted. Like the fact that the policy covers only England, Wales and Northern Ireland. They can’t do it in Scotland. Because of the Scottish Parliament. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Legislative Powers of the Scottish Parliament · Devolved matters: all subjects which are not explicitly stated in the Scotland Act as reserved matters are automatically devolved to the Scottish Parliament. Most importantly, this includes agriculture, fisheries and forestry, economic development, education, environment, food standards, health, home affairs, law - courts, police & fire services, local government, sport and the arts, transport, training, tourism, research and statistics and social work. The Scottish Parliament has the ability to alter income tax, in Scotland, by up to 3 pence in the pound.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Parliament">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sco...Parliament</a> In every one of those areas the law in Scotland is different to the law in England. And in every one of those areas the provision of services is superior to that in England. Because England has no parliament. But I want to concentrate on Justice here. The powers exercised by Ediburgh on behalf of the Scottish people are exercised by Westminster on behalf of the English people. Westminster is the parliament of the United Kingdom as a whole. In theory the politician responsible is the Home Secretary. Charles Clarke. Remember, an “Englishman” has been murdered by the Metropolitan Police. How does Clarke carry out his responsibilities? <blockquote>Quote:<hr>The Home Office has said Operation Kratos was a matter for the police, but it is not clear who in Whitehall would have been aware of the change in tactics.<hr></blockquote><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,,1567370,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/attack...70,00.html</a> Charles Clarke is far too busy prostituting himself to have any concerns for the corpse of Jean Charles de Menezes <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Breakfast with Clarke prompts 'cash for access' row Matthew Tempest and Oliver King Friday April 7, 2006 Labour was tonight involved in another cash row, as a new business group was revealed to be offering access to cabinet ministers in return for donations to the Labour party. London in Business, an offshoot of the Labour party business liaison unit, is offering businesses the chance to have breakfasts and lunches with government ministers in return for subscriptions of thousands of pounds a year. Business people have so far been offered a chance to network with the home secretary, Charles Clarke, and the transport secretary, Alistair Darling, in return for between £2,000 and £3,500 a year. Mr Clarke's spokeswoman said that it was "absolutely ridiculous" to suggest that this was an example of "cash for access" and that it was "completely normal" practice. The chair of London in Business, Labour donor and property developer Kevin McGrath, said that businessmen paying to attend such events was entirely "normal" and that the first meeting had only raised "peanuts" for the party. But with an hour-and-three-quarters' access to government ministers - rather than merely Labour politicians - on offer, it has prompted accusations of "cash for access" from political rivals. Because the sums are below the £5,000 minimum, they do not need to be declared as a donation under electoral law.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,1749425,00.html">politics.guardian.co.uk/f...25,00.html</a> I think that is enough to absorb for the moment.

by **slimmouse** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:06 pm

Moulded on the SETI temple, dated at at least 54000 years BC. Sits just at the back of the Sphinx, it does. What on earth is that Sphinx exactly ? Just ask QUTB. Hes our resident middle East expert according to some. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"> Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=slimmouse@rigorousintuition>slimmouse</A> at: 4/10/06 4:11 pm

by **slimmouse** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:20 pm

The S.E.T.I temple As David Shayler recently pointed out, theres a coincidence for ya <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)">

by **antiaristo** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:33 pm

(self delete)

why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

Re: why for god's sake is the UK still interfering anyway ?

I couldnt agree more.

Re: I couldnt agree more.

Re: I couldnt agree more.

Re: England and Scotland

Rosslyn Chapel is an interesting study.

P.S.

sorry

Who is online