WTC7: a dud?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

WTC7: a dud?

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:58 am

Here's a completely new, and convincing, take on the collapse of WTC7:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc7_dud.htm">www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc7_dud.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WTC7: a dud?

Postby darkbeforedawn » Fri Aug 26, 2005 8:41 am

Thanks for posting this Peachtree! This is choice. Reading this article and looking back on all the lame statements made about WTC7 at the time of the collapse... I am sure there is something to it. <p></p><i></i>
darkbeforedawn
 

WTC7

Postby Ferry Fey » Fri Aug 26, 2005 1:51 pm

Weren't there some others who died in WTC7 as well as the officer mentioned? I thought I had seen that there were some rescue workers who hadn't heard the retreat messages.<br><br>It would be very interesting if a long-time employee of Controlled Demolition, Inc were to do some whistleblowing.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Ferry Fey
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 9:13 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Controlled demolition

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:48 pm

Any whistleblower from Controlled Demolition would meet with a severe case of "sudden death syndrome"......<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Controlled demolition

Postby ZeroHaven » Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:04 pm

Oh boy, just what was needed, another aspect to the story.<br>At least it's good.<br><br>This is so plausible because if building 7 had come down at the same time, it would have made the expert demolitions of the other two buildings look less perfect. like "Hey look, tower 1 didn't fall perfectly, it fell on the other building." <p><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a239/ZeroHaven/tinhat.gif"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--></p><i></i>
ZeroHaven
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:34 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

WTC7

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:08 pm

Zero,<br><br>Exactly...I think he makes a good case... <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

WTC7

Postby Nonny » Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:18 pm

I have wondered if there was suppose to be another plane crash. 3 planes, 3 buildings, 3 collapses.<br><br>Maybe the plane never made it off the ground because of the order to ground all aricraft.<br><br>The demolition-like fall of each building would mean explosives were set in advance of 9/11. <br><br>I think that "pull it", was just a "Plan B" <p></p><i></i>
Nonny
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:35 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Dud or...

Postby Project Willow » Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:38 pm

Couldn't there be a number of scenarios which delayed the implosion?<br><br>thanks for the link, btw. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

3 planes?

Postby rapt » Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:25 pm

Nonny, two planes was already such a tidy plan; too neat by half. Now you want three? <p></p><i></i>
rapt
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:31 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Yup----

Postby Nonny » Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:31 pm

that's what I think <p></p><i></i>
Nonny
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:35 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests