by proldic » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:09 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>...possibly the insider who infiltrated the NORAD system<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I have to respectfully disagree here, because the circumstantial and historical evidence points to the fact that most of the elements that made up the US "high command" on 9/11 (ie: highest leadership levels of the US CIA, NSA, military and air force, Secret Service, White House) are the guilty parties. <br><br>I'm curious as to why otherwise healthily skeptical and conspiracy-minded people, who will accept and believe the most extreme esoteric studies such as reptile-control without hard "proof", seem to have a problem with and fear acknowledging the biggest conspiracy: the idea that it's not a 5th column, the idea that the high-profile "neo-con vulcans" are as much a part of the distraction as the "texas oilianaires" or "the hawks (vs. the tri-lateralists) once were...the idea that 9/11 wasn't the result of "infiltration" by "traitors", it was business-as-usual for the US, a fundamental all-encompassing (largely organic) "accepted as policy" conspiracy, most recognizably mileposted in the last time they were on a "kill-crazy rampage" -- the era of MLK-Malcolm X-RFK-JFK (and 1000+ lesser-knowns). You of all people should know this. <br><br>And this is why I seem obssesed with this point, because it's one of the biggest keys to subtly-but-vitally distracting otherwise-dangerous-to-power folks such as yourself from fully comprehending the yawning chasm of the US-based capitalist global conspiracy. So as long as you keep thinking along the Sutton-esque "pox on both the houses" line-of-thinking a'la' "Busheviks", you'll never really be a serious threat politically with your voice to them. And <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>you</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> could be -- especially you... <br><br>But the elevation of certain characters such as Dov Zahkeim and Phillip Zelikow to high-flak positions is a key part of the game that many people seem to think is completely unreasonable. Doesn't anybody realize that they have for centuries elevated certain token Jew and (now black and latino) "Uncle Ariels", opportunists being evenly balanced within any ethnic groups, then set about to smear the "race", with what to me is obviously using it to distract from their central leadership role? What would make today any different? In fact, wouldn't it be more subtle and practiced and veiled and self-legitimizing and self-reinforcing and comprehensive than ever before? And I'm sure you realize it was many more than just "6 million jews" that were IBM-technologically exterminated during the "holocaust"... <br><br>They didn't "infiltrate" NORAD. Did every radar operator know what was going down ("Is this real-world or exercise?")? No. Were the majority of the individuals in the command-and-control structure of the US air defense complicit as a whole? Yes. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>No infiltration necessary</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, in fact it would be impossible to do it any other way than with the full support of the leadership. <br><br>But I'm sure you can see the difference in the accusations, and where they lead people politically, right? <br><br>One -- I'll take the liberty of calling it "<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>the infiltration-by-Neo-con 5th columnists-like [insert Jewish-name here] conspiracy</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->" -- leads us to ignore the fundamental (revolutionary) battle that has been a core part of our country's history, going all the way back past 1963, all the way back to the times of (despite what your Chomsky's and various anarchist strains would have us dismiss) the <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>genuine <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>revolutionary</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> battles</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> between "Republicans" and "federalists" (code for monarchists), and instead blame "neo-cons", "zionists", "traitors", "infiltrators", "foreign agents", whatever, just as long as it's not the US intelligence-military-industrial complex as a whole. <br><br>The other, which also happens to be the truth backed by the most credible eveidence, points directly front and center at the real heart of power, and confronts the real elephant in the living room. You decide, bro.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Capitalism</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> is the real <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>5th Column</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> in a democracy. <br><br>Btw, were you aware that the USA was the primary financier of the French cccupation of Vietnam, <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>more than the French government</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->, going back <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>at least</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> 12 years <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>before</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Diembienphu?<br><br>Doesn't that mean something <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>huge</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> about the historical centrality of US power globally, and the myths that many of us (even those that were over there) may accept about the Vietnam era? <p></p><i></i>