The Screwing of Cynthia McKinney

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Re:shifting into third gear smear

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:38 pm

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The shenanigans ensue</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">Republicans Vote To Deny America A Congressional Ethics Investigation</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--><br> <br><br><br>Republicans vote in lock-step to deny American's an investigation into Congressional corruption.<br><br>Two hundred and eighteen (218 ) loyal Republicans voted to table a resolution brought to the floor by Democrat Nancy Pelosi which would have resulted in a probe into what is generally perceived to be widespread corruption within the Republican Party. The Resolution, supported by one hundred ninety eight (198 ) loyal Democrats, was pushed aside in a 15 minute vote. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=onoi812>OnoI812</A> at: 4/5/06 4:39 pm<br></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Re:shifting into third gear smear

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:30 pm

Surprises, Kerry was a standup guy yesterday.<br>----------------------------------------------------<br><br><br><br>Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, today, on the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination, I am pleased to join with my colleague in the House, Congresswoman CYNTHIA MCKINNEY to introduce the Martin Luther King, Jr., Record Collections Act. This act will ensure the expeditious disclosure and preservation of records relevant to Dr. King's life and death. Fully releasing these records--many of which are not subject to disclosure until 2038--will shed significant light on a turning point in American history. My friend, Representative JOHN LEWIS, explained its necessity quite eloquently:<br><br>I, too, was the subject of unwarranted FBI surveillance during the Civil Rights Movement. Because we do not know this part of our history, it is clear that we are beginning to repeat it. Recently, we became aware of the administration's domestic spying program that has targeted peace groups that are carrying on the nonviolent action of Dr. King. It is time that we know our history, and passage of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Records Act will take us one step closer to uncovering that history.<br><br>Judge Joseph Brown, the last presiding judge in James Earl Ray's post-conviction relief proceedings, also supports this legislation. He believes that it is important to:<br><br>..... fully release the still classified historical record surrounding the life and death of the late Dr. King. In light of the disturbing records and documents that came to light in James Earl Ray's petition before me and in consideration of the recent furor over the power and authority granted to certain officials under the guise of the Homeland Security Act, it might prove most illuminating to review the historical record relative to the exercise of purportedly similar power and authority by the U.S. officials 40 years ago. The American public, the citizens of the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave deserve this access to the historic record surrounding the life and death of Dr. King.<br><br>Our legislation will create a Martin Luther King Records Collection at the National Archives. This will include all records--public and private--related to the life and death of Dr. King, including any investigations or inquiries by Federal, State, or local agencies. The records will be organized in a central directory to allow the public to access them online from anywhere in the world. The documents will be overseen by a review board consisting of at least one professional historian, one attorney, one researcher, and one representative of the civil rights community.<br><br>The MLK Records Review Board, a five-member independent agency, will be responsible for facilitating the review and transmission of all related records to the Archivist for public disclosure. Members will be nominated by the President and approved with the advice and consent of the Senate. It will have the power to direct government offices to locate and organize related records and transmit them for review or release. It will also have the power to investigate the facts surrounding the transmission<br><br>or possession of records, take testimony of individuals in order to fulfill their responsibilities, request the Attorney General to subpoena private persons or government employees to compel testimony or records and require agencies to account in writing for any previous or current destruction of related records. In addition, the Board can request that the Attorney General petition any court in the U.S. or abroad to release any sealed information or physical evidence relevant to the life or death of Dr. King, and to subpoena such evidence if it is no longer in the possession of the government. The MLK Records Review Board will also be required to provide annual reports to Congress, the President, the Archivist, and all government agencies whose records have been reviewed, and to the public. The Board must terminate its work no later than 5 years from the passage of the Act unless it votes to extend for an additional 2-year term.<br><br>The reason for having such a Board is to ensure that someone is responsible for finding all relevant records and that the records do not disclose any sensitive information. It is particularly important to have a Board like this given recent revelations by the New York Times that the government has begun removing thousands of declassified documents on a wide range of historical subjects from public access at the National Archives. There has perhaps never been a more urgent time to bring the records on Dr. King into the light of day. According to the National Archives, about 9,500 records totaling more than 55,000 pages have been withdrawn from the public shelves and reclassified since 1999. We need to ensure that the records relating to the life and death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., do not suffer the same fate. They are too important to us at this point in American history.<br><br>Dr. King challenged the conscience of my generation, and his words and his legacy continue to move generations to action today. His love and faith is alive in the millions of Americans who volunteer each day in soup kitchens or in schools, and those who refused to ignore the suffering of thousands they'd never met when Hurricane Katrina destroyed lives and communities. His vision and his passion are alive in churches and on campuses when millions stand up against the injustice of discrimination or the indifference that leaves too many behind.<br><br>The best way to honor the memory of Dr. King is to finish his work at home and around the world. And the first step to furthering his legacy is to know the full body of it. I hope that my colleagues will join me in this very important effort: to preserve and learn from records relating to the life and death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.<br><br>-----------------------------------------------<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=853989&mesg_id=854097">www.democraticunderground..._id=854097</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=onoi812>OnoI812</A> at: 4/5/06 9:04 pm<br></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby CyberChrist » Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:37 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Get the Fuck out of my thread Cyber<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Well, you're talking about my congresswoman, so ummm.. no.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>They got nothing...cept slime<br>and we don't need your allegations, The MSM has that well in hand.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>What allegations? That she is a racist bitch? It's something that she seems to be proud of as she doesn't miss any opportunity to blame "whitey" for whatever trouble she is in.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>She has not been charged<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>.. yet.<br><br>She probably won't be since it's going to be turned into a race issue, but the dumbass should have just stopped and produced some identification and be done with it.<br><br>Why is it that she feels that the rules that everyone else has to abide by do not apply to her? <p>--<br>CyberChrist<br>http://www.hackerjournal.org<br>My brain is hung like a horse.</p><i></i>
CyberChrist
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:24 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Well, you're talking about my congresswoman, so ummm.. no.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Ok, then if you're to participate, try to follow where this is leading. If you're going to talk about her past bothersome comments, try and link to them so you can add context.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>What allegations? That she is a racist bitch? It's something that she seems to be proud of as she doesn't miss any opportunity to blame "whitey" for whatever trouble she is in.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I'm not sure John Judge and Kyle Hence feel that way as they work closely with her and they're mighty pale guys, She also speaks highly of and credits Alex Jones(hardly blame)...so, I see no evidence she hates <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>all</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> whitey. Just the one's that take a dump on her.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>She probably won't be since it's going to be turned into a race issue, but the dumbass should have just stopped and produced some identification and be done with it.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Well I think you're both wrong and wrong here. Wrong that she won't be charged, and wrong about the showing of ID (I don't think she was given a chance as this was a well crafted setup) And wrong that they have any intention of letting her be done with it.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Why is it that she feels that the rules that everyone else has to abide by do not apply to her?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I'll explain all that and my justification for the above shortly,<br>It'll take a little while to gather everything...check back later <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby sunny » Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:37 pm

Some guy on Abrams Report(Billy Martin, attorney?) made a good point. He said she passed the checkpoint and the policeman started yelling "Hey, Hey, you there, stop!"<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>She didn't know he was talking to her</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> and kept going. Of course, as a rep, she would assume he was talking to someone else. Then, someone comes up behind her and grabs her. What would you have done, if you were not only a woman, but a nationally known controversial figure, who probably gets death threats every day? <p></p><i></i>
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: More smearing

Postby CyberChrist » Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:42 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Ok, then if you're to participate, try to follow where this is leading. If you're going to talk about her past bothersome comments, try and link to them so you can add context.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Sure thing! Thanks for letting me participate in a public forum! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>All kidding aside, I have lived in Atlanta for 20+ years so I am used to seeing her in the news along with her idiotic comments from time to time, as well as seeing her bright and well-thought-out comments on national news as well, particularly with regards to 9/11. While she should be praised for such things, it by no means lets her off the hook when she acts like this as MY representative.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'm not sure John Judge and Kyle Hence feel that way as they work closely with her and they're mighty pale guys, She also speaks highly of and credits Alex Jones(hardly blame)...so, I see no evidence she hates all whitey. Just the one's that take a dump on her.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>"Hating whitey" doesn't mean that she hates all whites. I worked on her re-election campaign in 2004 and I can't say that she was mean to me or anything, but there is this air about her public politics and many public comments that seem to infer racism in just about anything bad that happens to her. In those regards, she does have this "I hate whitey" attitude.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Well I think you're both wrong and wrong here. Wrong that she won't be charged, and wrong about the showing of ID (I don't think she was given a chance as this was a well crafted setup) And wrong that they have any intention of letting her be done with it.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Well, she has already turned it into a race issue:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/05/mckinney.scuffle/index.html">www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS...index.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"McKinney maintains racism is behind what she says is a pattern of difficulty getting past security checkpoints on Capitol Hill. She has charged that the altercation was "instigated by the inappropriate touching and stopping of me, a female black congresswoman."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>About the showing of ID (from the same link):<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>McKinney has acknowledged she was not wearing the lapel pin given to lawmakers when the officer stopped her. The lawmaker said the identification pin is irrelevant.<br><br>"It doesn't have a face or a photo ID on it, and quite frankly it can be duplicated," she said.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>No, it doesn't, but it is required to be worn. If I walked into my office building without my badge and a security officer stopped me and I slugged him, I'd be in just as much trouble.<br><br>Also, I fail to see how this is some kind of elaborate set up and I'm sorry, the only boogey man here is her hair stylist. No one except McKinney controlled her reaction. If they knew that she would react like this, then all the more reason for her to behave herself, especially when she is in the crosshairs of many of the PTB for daring to speak out on 9/11. <p>--<br>CyberChrist<br>http://www.hackerjournal.org<br>My brain is hung like a horse.</p><i></i>
CyberChrist
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:51 pm

sunny, I think that may be hearsay , as I'm not aware of any direct eyewitnesses of the alleged assault save for McKinney and the policeman.<br><br>(the confrontation could have taken place outside of view of the actual checkpoint hallway)<br><br>did the hearsay witness give an idea of layout or distances?<br><br>Was she talking on her cellphone?<br><br>was the policeman already in pursuit away from the checkpoint before he gave verbal commands? Or did he call from the checkpoint as he was preoccupied with other searches?<br>That hearsay witness seems to indicate the latter. <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:22 pm

Cyber<br><br>Perhaps I should have clarified it better, by setup, I mean after the fact, after it was handed into the repubs laps.<br>and I feel she is a little caught off guard by all this , and she is not being her well prepared, researched and reasoned self, so yes, she is causing some self inflicted wounds here.<br><br>The pins are not a requirement for congressmen, they are a recommendation, not everyone wears them and they likely would have no effect in this instance as reports indicate she was already by before she was supposedly called. She <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>was</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> wearing her congressional ID and those are also, only a recommendation according to the LEE statement.<br><br>again , I'll further get into why that is, soon <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=onoi812>OnoI812</A> at: 4/5/06 7:25 pm<br></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby CyberChrist » Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:28 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>perhaps I should have clarified it better, by setup I mean after the fact, after it was handed into the repubs laps.<br>and I feel she is a little caught off guard by all this , and she is not being her well prepared, researched and reasoned self, so yes, she is causing some self inflicted wounds here.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>What she is also doing is embarassing anyone that has supported her and worked to get her re-elected in 2004 when she lost her seat in 2002. I frankly thought that the 2002 loss would have humbled her a bit and now she is prancing around acting like she deserves special treatment. Her behavior makes it very hard to support her re-election bid at this time, but frankly we don't have much of a viable alternate Democrat in the district. If we did, she would be out as most of us here in the district have had just about enough of her antics.<br><br>She was on CNN making a fool of herself in an interview and saying "You can't stop me" when the interviewer wanted to stop and ask about the allegations.<br><br>The fact is that she struck a police officer and I can't really think of a reason why she should get away with it if she did so. I know that if I was stopped by the police and I struck the officer, I would be in jail. <p>--<br>CyberChrist<br>http://www.hackerjournal.org<br>My brain is hung like a horse.</p><i></i>
CyberChrist
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: More smearing

Postby 4911 » Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:39 pm

She probably didnt even really punch him. I dont know about that. She probably just put her arm up cuz he might have squeezed it a bit harder than she liked. He might have touched her in a way she didnt feel comfortable with, and she simply put her hand on his chest to straighten herself out or stabilize the situation/confrontation. <br><br>Situations like that are a dime a dozen and too detailed and quick to explain later. As a rule though, if a person initiates physical contact of a more forcible nature, then that person shouldnt whine about reprecussions. If someone intrudes into your personal zone, then its up to you to see what your gonna do about it. Often there isnt much time to decide and the reaction is instinctive.<br><br>I think the cop is acting like a total pussy. Whats a total pussy like that doing guarding congress? He gonna all cry and go to pieces on a real threat? This guy made of sugar or somethin that he takes it so serious? <br><br>Is it in a policemans interest to piss off a congresswoman? I mean the initial grabbing was one thing, but this media circus is another. <br><br>Is there any video of this? They have surveillance cameras dont they? What about doctor records? Did he need to be hospitalized? Were there any bruises? Is he pushing charges? What makes him so ballsy to go up against a congresswoman? He aint gonna lose his job? Hows he know that for sure? Or maybe he doesnt care cuz "someone" suddenly has a pension plan for him all set up? This smells a bit of a timed smear to keep the 911 movent in check; to keep McKinney from riding on Sheens momentum. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 4/5/06 10:15 pm<br></i>
4911
 
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:34 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest