by dugoboy » Fri May 19, 2006 11:10 am
Russell Pickering of Pentagon Research's analysis of the pentagon video:<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.rense.com/general71/pentvi.htm" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">Pentagon Video Observations</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>excerpted end summary:<br><br>"<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>It strikes me that something flew into the Pentagon. I don't know what to say though because it also appears nearly as certain from all of the comparisons that the size, bright color and reflection of the object in the videos does not match what you would expect from a 757-200. I am NOT endorsing a missile or anything else! I am just looking at the physical evidence without a conclusion. <br> <br>It does seem that they do not want us to have any clear picture of what it was exactly.....for now. I think the warnings people have made about a possible booby trap are valid. Don't bite on all of this and go on a tangent. They could pull something solid (or apparently solid) out of the bag and ridicule us later. We should focus on the irrefutable evidence like the demolition of WTC7, the free-fall speed of the towers, Norad, PNAC etc., in other words, things that are WELL documented. The Pentagon situation is always going to be a sticky mess. I think they have made themselves look bad enough without any more help from us.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->" <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>