by yesferatu » Wed May 31, 2006 11:29 pm
device used to bring down the towers?<br>I think there are compelling reasons to argue for it. <br>This is what I mentioned earlier and no one discussed...is small thermonuclear device an embarrassing woo-woo issue that is not discussed?<br>Like "holographic planes"? Just curious to know why it is woo-woo to consider a small thermonuclear device. <br>Like I noted, the "dredlock" monstrous brown streamers were a puzzle (for me) until the equation of thermonuclear explosive(s) was presented.<br>In point of fact the "dreds" anomalies had never been addressed in ANY of the extensive reading and studying I have personally been acquainted with. Maybe there is another explanation. Like to hear it.<br><br>Also, another odd thing that always bothered me but never had any explanation for was the photos of the tower where the top of the tower is clearly seen at a good 20-30 degree angle of pitch and yet "it righted itself" to fall in the footprint. What is remarkable is that it did not fall as a monstrous chunk, but simply vaporized with the rest of everything into powder - there was no longer a chunk of tower falling away from the rest of the tower. It simply went poof with everything else. <br><br>Can anyone tell me why it is foolish to take the thermonuclear tack, or else explain why it is up there with holographic jets theories. Thanks.<br><br>Here is that link again<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/soldier5.htm">www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/soldier5.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I have an audio issue, so can't watch the vid just yet. <p></p><i></i>
