Some more 9/11 truth

[FourthBase]

Ugh, whatever. <p></p><i></i>

[orz]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>we have enough evidence.<br><br>arrest the bums!!!<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Uh..... you go first <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><br>(hope the 'evidence' is a trifle more convincing than that phone transcript! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ) <p></p><i></i>

[greencrow0]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Seriously, I found that conversation you posted pretty funny first time round but looking at it again I actually am quite annoyed... I take it as a real insult that I'm supposed to give such junk the time of day<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I'm quite annoyed that I have to wonder and worry about whether the perps will pull an "October surprise" in order to terrorize the US electorate too.<br><br>...but that's life.<br><br>gc <p></p><i></i>

[orz]

Sure, there's cause to worry but.... please tell me you don't entertain the notion that that's a genuine transcript of a geniune phonecall... <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :x --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/sick.gif ALT=":x"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

Has this been posted here before?<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060824/NEWS01/108240131">nashuatelegraph.com/apps/.../108240131</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Published: Thursday, Aug. 24, 2006<br><br>A Republican candidate for this area’s congressional seat said Wednesday that the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.<br><br>In an editorial board interview with The Telegraph on Wednesday, the candidate, Mary Maxwell, said the U.S. government had a role in killing nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, so it could make Americans hate Arabs and allow the military to bomb Muslim nations such as Iraq. <br><br>Maxwell, 59, seeks the 2nd District congressional seat. The Concord resident opposes the incumbent, Charles Bass of Peterborough, and Berlin Mayor Bob Danderson in the Republican primary Sept. 12.<br><br>Maxwell would not specify if she holds the opinion that the government stood by while terrorists hijacked four domestic airliners and used them as weapons, or if it had a larger role by sanctioning and carrying out the attacks.<br><br>But she implicated the government by saying the Sept. 11 attacks were meant “to soften us up . . . to make us more willing to have more stringent laws here, which are totally against the Bill of Rights . . . to make us particularly focus on Arabs and Muslims . . . and those strange persons who spend all their time creating little bombs,” giving Americans a reason “to hate them and fear them and, therefore, bomb them in Iraq for other reasons.”<br><br>She said this strategy “would be normal” for governments, citing her belief that the British government – and not the Germany military – sank the Lusitania ocean liner in 1915. The deaths of Americans on the cruise liner helped galvanize U.S. support to enter World War I, and benefited England, she said.<br><br>In turn, the Sept. 11 attacks “made the ground fertile” for more stringent laws, such as the Patriot Act, and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, Maxwell said.<br><br>Mary Maxwell <br>OFFICE SOUGHT: U.S. Congress, 2nd District.<br>AGE: 59.<br>ADDRESS: Concord.<br>POLITICAL BACKGROUND: None.<br>OCCUPATION: Student.<br>EDUCATION: Doctorate in politics from an Australian college; course in diplomatic and consular law at the University of Mannheim, Germany.<br>AFFILIATIONS: None.<br>MILITARY: None.<br>PERSONAL: Husband, George, deceased.<br>WEB SITE: www.maxwellforcongress.com <br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

Keeping the recent threads "threaded":<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=5881.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...5881.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=5866.topic&start=21&stop=33">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...21&stop=33</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=5739.topic&start=181&stop=184">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...1&stop=184</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=5523.topic&start=41&stop=50">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...41&stop=50</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>She said this strategy “would be normal” for governments, citing her belief that the British government – and not the Germany military – sank the Lusitania ocean liner in 1915.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Gawd, I hope she cited more false-flag terrorism than the Lusitania.<br><br>If she did, I would expect the newspaper to only include the dusty distant Lusitania to keep her from making her case more effectively.<br><br>Media specializes in omission as a plausibly deniable form of spin. <p></p><i></i>

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

After reading the linked article on Maxwell I see that she's portrayed as a fist-pounding isolationist-<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Near the end of the interview, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Maxwell pounded her fist on the table and asked editors of The Telegraph why they weren’t publishing more stories about the government’s role in the terrorist attacks or proliferation of nuclear weapons.<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Maxwell has no political experience. She lived abroad for the past quarter-century with her husband, George, a pediatrician, and only recently returned to the U.S., she said.<br><br>In the hour-long interview, Maxwell spoke at length about Constitutional law, U.S. law, nuclear weapons proliferation, and other domestic and foreign policy issues.<br><br>Maxwell said the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq. She also questioned whether Congress authorized the war and said its members can’t explain that 2002 vote. (Congress authorized the use of force to defend this country’s security and enforce United Nations resolutions on Iraq.)<br><br>“Legally, we shouldn’t have gone to Iraq if Congress can’t explain why,” she said.<br><br>Maxwell described herself as a strict Constitutionalist, a candidate who wants to bring the country “back to basics.” The Constitution grants more power to the legislative branch than the other two branches, but Congress has allowed the executive and judicial branches to diminish its influence, she said.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>She also said the U.S. shouldn’t immerse itself in the international community by signing trade and security pacts. These agreements have weakened national sovereignty, she said.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>