ABC Planning Massive Free Distribution of 9/11 Docudrama

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: John Miller's take?!?

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:56 am

Well, now it should be apparent to all naive Dems just where ABC stands politically.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/discover-the-secret-right_b_29015.html">www.huffingtonpost.com/ma...29015.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Less than 72 hours before ABC's "The Path to 9/11" is scheduled to air, the network is suddenly under siege. On Tuesday, ABC was forced to concede that "The Path to 9/11" is "a dramatization, not a documentary." The film deceptively invents scenes to depict former President Bill Clinton's handling of the Al Qaeda threat.<br><br>Now, ABC claims to be is editing those false sequences to satisfy critics so the show can go on -- even if it still remains a gross distortion of history. And as it does so, ABC advances the illusion that the deceptive nature of "The Path to 9/11" is an honest mistake committed by a hardworking but admittedly fumbling team of well-intentioned Hollywood professionals who wanted nothing less than to entertain America. But this is another Big Lie.<br><br>In fact, "The Path to 9/11" is produced and promoted by a well-honed propaganda operation consisting of a network of little-known right-wingers working from within Hollywood to counter its supposedly liberal bias. This is the network within the ABC network. Its godfather is far right activist David Horowitz, who has worked for more than a decade to establish a right-wing presence in Hollywood and to discredit mainstream film and TV production. On this project, he is working with a secretive evangelical religious right group founded by The Path to 9/11's director David Cunningham that proclaims its goal to "transform Hollywood" in line with its messianic vision. <br><br>Before The Path to 9/11 entered the production stage, Disney/ABC contracted David Cunningham as the film's director. Cunningham is no ordinary Hollywood journeyman. He is in fact the son of Loren Cunningham, founder of the right-wing evangelical group Youth With A Mission (YWAM). The young Cunningham helped found an auxiliary of his father's group called The Film Institute (TFI), which, according to its mission statement, is "dedicated to a Godly transformation and revolution TO and THROUGH the Film and Televisionindustry." As part of TFI's long-term strategy, Cunningham helped place interns from Youth With A Mission's in film industry jobs "so that they can begin to impact and transform Hollywood from the inside out," according to a YWAM report.<br><br>Last June, Cunningham's TFI announced it was producing its first film, mysteriously titled "Untitled History Project." "TFI's first project is a doozy," a newsletter to YWAM members read. "Simply being referred to as: The Untitled History Project, it is already being called the television event of the decade and not one second has been put to film yet. Talk about great expectations!" (A web edition of the newsletter was mysteriously deleted yesterday but has been cached on Google at the link above).<br><br>The following month, on July 28, the New York Post reported that ABC was filming a mini-series "under a shroud of secrecy" about the 9/11 attacks. "At the moment, ABC officials are calling the miniseries 'Untitled Commission Report' and producers refer to it as the 'Untitled History Project,'" the Post noted.<br><br>Early on, Cunningham had recruited a young Iranian-American screenwriter named Cyrus Nowrasteh to<br>write the script of his secretive "Untitled" film. Not only is Nowrasteh an outspoken conservative, he is also a fervent member of the emerging network of right-wing people burrowing into the film industry with ulterior sectarian political and religious agendas, like Cunningham.<br><br>Nowrasteh's conservatism was on display when he appeared as a featured speaker at the Liberty Film Festival (LFF), an annual event founded in 2004 to premier and promote conservative-themed films supposedly too "politically incorrect" to gain acceptance at mainstream film festivals. This June, while The Path to 9/11 was being filmed, LFF founders Govindini Murty and Jason Apuzzo -- both friends of Nowrasteh -- announced they were "partnering" with right-wing activist David Horowitz. Indeed, the 2006 LFF is listed as "A Program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center."<br><br>Since the inauguration of Bill Clinton in 1992, Horowitz has labored to create a network of politically active conservatives in Hollywood. His Hollywood nest centers around his Wednesday Morning Club, a<br>weekly meet-and-greet session for Left Coast conservatives that has been graced with speeches by<br>the likes of Newt Gingrich, Victor Davis Hanson and Christopher Hitchens. The group's headquarters are at the offices of Horowitz's Center for the Study of Popular Culture, a "think tank" bankrolled for years with millions by right-wing sugardaddies like eccentric far right billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife. (Scaife<br>financed the Arkansas Project, a $2.3 million dirty tricks operation that included paying sources for<br>negative stories about Bill Clinton that turned out to be false.)<br><br>With the LFF now under Horowitz's control, his political machine began drumming up support for Cunningham and Nowrasteh's "Untitled" project, which finally was revealed in late summer as "The Path to 9/11." Horowitz's PR blitz began with an August 16 interview with Nowrasteh on his FrontPageMag webzine. In the interview, Nowrasteh foreshadowed the film's assault on Clinton's record on fighting terror. "The 9/11 report details the Clinton's administration's response -- or lack of response -- to Al Qaeda and how this emboldened Bin Laden to keep attacking American interests," Nowrasteh told FrontPageMag's Jamie Glazov. "There simply was no response. Nothing."<br><br>A week later, ABC hosted LFF co-founder Murty and several other conservative operatives at an advance<br>screening of The Path to 9/11. (While ABC provided 900 DVDs of the film to conservatives, Clinton administration officials and objective reviewers from mainstream outlets were denied them.) Murty returned with a glowing review for FrontPageMag that emphasized the film's partisan nature. "'The Path to 9/11' is one of the best, most intelligent, most pro-American miniseries I've ever seen on TV, and conservatives should support<br>it and promote it as vigorously as possible," Murty wrote. As a result of the special access granted by ABC, Murty's article was the first published review of The Path to 9/11, preceding those by the New York Times and LA Times by more than a week.<br><br>Murty followed her review with a blast email to conservative websites such as Liberty Post and Free Republic on September 1 urging their readers to throw their weight behind ABC's mini-series. "Please do everything you can to spread the word about this excellent miniseries," Murty wrote, "so that 'The Path to 9/11' gets the highest ratings possible when it airs on September 10 & 11! If this show gets huge ratings, then ABC will be more likely to produce pro-American movies and TV shows in the future!"<br><br>Murty's efforts were supported by Appuzo, who handles LFF's heavily-trafficked blog, Libertas. Appuzo was instrumental in marketing The Path to 9/11 to conservatives, writing in a blog post on September 2, "Make no mistake about what this film does, among other things: it places the question of the Clinton Administration's culpability for the 9/11 attacks front and center... Bravo to Cyrus Nowrasteh and David<br>Cunningham for creating this gritty, stylish and gripping piece of entertainment." <br><br>When a group of leading Senate Democrats sent a letter to ABC CEO Robert Iger urging him to cancel The Path to 9/11 because of its glaring factual errors and distortions, Apuzzo launched a retaliatory campaign to paint the Democrats as foes of free speech. "Here at LIBERTAS we urge the public to make noise over this, and to demand that Democrats back down," he wrote on September 7th. "What is at stake is nothing short of the 1st Amendment."<br><br>At FrontPageMag, Horowitz singled out Nowrasteh as the victim. "The attacks by former president Bill Clinton, former Clinton Administration officials and Democratic US senators on Cyrus Nowrasteh's ABC<br>mini-series "The Path to 9/11" are easily the gravest and most brazen and damaging governmental attacks on the civil liberties of ordinary Americans since 9/11," Horowitz declared.<br><br>Now, as discussion grows over the false character of The Path to 9/11, the right-wing network that brought it to fruition is ratcheting up its PR efforts. Murty will appear tonight on CNN's Glenn Beck<br>show and The Situation Room, according to Libertas in order to respond to "the major disinformation campaign now being run by Democrats to block the truth about what actually happened during the Clinton years."<br><br>While this network claims its success and postures as the true victims, the ABC network suffers a PR catastrophe. It's almost as though it was complacent about an attack on its reputation by a band of political terrorists.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Even the flap serves as publicity and focusing.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:09 pm

The flap with Clinton protesting and ABC "tinkering" serves to reinforce the key propaganda theme of Democratic manipulation of national security perceptions. And all while making people curious to see the controversy. Fabulous publicity.<br><br>'Heads they win, tails we lose.'<br><br>We win by getting people to stop watching TV or atleast seeing it as 100% Lie Factory and Social Engineering.<br><br>All TV, even PBS, is state-controlled just like Voice of America and for the same reasons. (Recall that Bill Moyers was director of the Council on Foreign Relations from 1967-1974 but won't tell you what he knows about how we are militarily occupied by the Pentagon and CIA.)<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: John Miller's take?!?

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:10 pm

Does ABC's weird move have anything to do with Fox's falling ratings, do you suppose? Could ABC be dumb enough to think, "Aha, here's our chance to be the new foxier Fox"? Surely they're smart enough to figure out that Fox is losing viewers for a reason. Will CBS, NBC be smart enough report in-depth on this, to kick this can as far as they can? Stay tuned for Days of Our News. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: John Miller's take?!?

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:14 pm

Let's ask ABC to follow up the next week with Michael Moore's 9/11 documentary. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: John Miller's take?!?

Postby darkbeforedawn » Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:05 pm

Better yet--how about the John Albanese 9-11 film...I think Michael Moore is the master of withholding the really good stuff we have on the Gov. <p></p><i></i>
darkbeforedawn
 

'9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH'

Postby Sweejak » Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:03 am

A little off topic.. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In '9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH', six of them, including three of the famous "Jersey Girls", tell for the first time the powerful story of how they took on the greatest powers in Washington -- and won! -- compelling an investigation, only to subsequently watch the 9/11 Commission fail in answering most of their questions.<br><br>Adapting Paul Thompson's definitive Complete 9/11 Timeline (published by HarperCollins as 'The Terror Timeline'), the filmmakers collaborate with documentary veterans Globalvision ('WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception', 'Beyond JFK') to stich together rare overlooked news clips, buried stories, and government press conferences, revealing a pattern of official lies, deception and spin. As a result, a very different picture of 9/11 emerges, one that raises new and more pressing questions.<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Trailer:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8666444901186351024">video.google.com/videopla...1186351024</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Full movie: 364 MB<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://tinyurl.com/jmv9a">tinyurl.com/jmv9a</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>"World War III will be a guerrilla information war with no division between military and civilian participation."<br>-- Marshall McLuhan<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=sweejak@rigorousintuition>Sweejak</A> at: 9/9/06 11:56 pm<br></i>
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: '9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH'

Postby HMKGrey » Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:51 am

There's an excellent blow-by-blow account of the ABC furore over at Americablog.com. John there has the video and reviewed it live 'on air' as it were. <br><br>It makes for hair-raising reading. Highly recommended - but watch your blood pressure. <br><br>Latest news is that Bush is planning to adderss the nation and may do so right after or before ABC runs the tape. <br><br>I feel like taking my iPod back. <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

"Path" NZ trailer

Postby Pirx » Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:20 am

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHgbeJu1WGk&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrooksandliars%2Ecom%2F">It's not just true, it's officially true.</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://home.usit.net/~aeromancy/images/mickeylies.jpg.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Pirx
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: true, officially true...(but just like another movie...)

Postby Moddey Screbbagh » Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:43 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/The-Path-To-A-Decade-Old-Mo.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/09/09/the-path-to-a-decadeold-_e_29091.html">the path to a decade-old movie poster</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
Moddey Screbbagh
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: true, officially true...(but just like another movie...)

Postby yesferatu » Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:05 pm

Wow. Good one, Moddey!<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
yesferatu
 

Re: true, officially true...(but just like another movie...)

Postby NewKid » Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:36 pm

This is so over-the-top that it almost looks like it might be some sort of a manufactured controversy. Notice also how much attention has been devoted to debunking such obvious partisan agitprop. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Okay, I just watched the Sandy Berger scene. It is beyond defamatory. The reports you've read do not do it justice. <br><br>We are 1 hour 54 minutes into the film, it is the culmination of the entire first two hours of the film. CIA agents on the ground with Commander Massoud have found bin Laden. They have him pin-pointed in a house. They are looking at the house with binoculars. They are on the phone with the CIA, that has patched in Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger. Berger, like a bumbling ass, sits there, looking every which way, refusing to give them clearance to grab bin Laden who is in their literal grasp. The woman at the CIA has to lecture Berger about how intelligence works, like he's some kind of moron. Berger literally looks like a deer caught in the headlights. He's clueless, an idiot, a moron, unfit to serve in any public office - hell, I wouldn't hire the guy to mow my lawn. After a very long pause, the agents are begging Berger to take some responsibility, stop being such a wuss, stop trying to cover his chicken-shit ass, you see Berger reach forward and the phone line goes dead. Clearly Berger has ended the call. Osama gets away. And Sandy Berger is personally responsible for killing 3,000 Americans and bringing down the World Trade Center twin towers.<br><br>Not only is this scene FAR MORE defamatory than any review I've seen to date, this is THE KEY SCENE of the entire first half of the movie. You can't cut it, or a good portion of the movie just makes no sense. But Disney/ABC can't leave the scene is because it simply did not happen. CIA agents weren't on the ground, they weren't with Massoud, nobody had bin Laden in their grasp, and Berger never refused to give the order to get the guy.<br><br>The entire culmination of the first half of the show is one big fat lie. This isn't just a small scene with a small error. It's THE scene and it NEVER HAPPENED AT ALL.<br><br>Disney/ABC took a national tragedy and turned it into their own personal soap opera. If this thing airs, Disney and ABC are going to see the kind of campaign that they have never seen before. If they thought the past week has been hell, just wait for the next seven weeks leading up to the election when we take them on legislatively, legally, and in the public sphere for abusing the memory of 3,000 dead Americans.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/09/defamatory-sandy-berger-scene-in-911.html" target="top">americablog.blogspot.com/2006/09/defamatory-sandy-berger-scene-in-911.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>(see also <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/review/tv/0,6115,1516013_3_0_,00.html" target="top">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/entertainment/cst-ftr-elf08.html" target="top">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, and <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/reviews/2006-09-07-path-to-911_x.htm" target="top">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->).<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: true, officially true...(but just like another movie...)

Postby FourthBase » Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:27 pm

Guys, who here was shocked and delighted by the inclusion of Emad Salem? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: true, officially true...(but just like another movie...)

Postby dugoboy » Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:19 pm

what bullshit of an ending. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT." -Me<br><br>"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" -George Orwell<br><br>"When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it - always."-Mahatma Gandhi</p><i></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests