by FourthBase » Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:24 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In other real collapses, articles such as I mentioned above were clearly recognizable. No such luck here. Only remnants of steel--. And bodies? None reported. Smudges and dabs of DNA were all that remained. In actual collapses identifiable remains were found: clothing, personal effects, briefcases etc. etc. How did 110 stories compress into a pile so SHORT??? Unless, of course, most of the contents were vaporized which appears to be the case. The metal alone remains. You proved my case. Thank you.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>OK, please link or post to the photos of other collapses where recognizable furniture and bodies can be seen.<br><br>Also, have you not seen the exhibits of artifacts pulled from the rubble? Or do you think they were manufactured artifacts?<br><br>NOBODY HAS PROVEN ANYBODY'S CASE.<br>There's not enough fucking evidence, period.<br>Go ahead with your premature "conclusions"...<br>You'll only ruin things for the real skeptics.<br><br>Or...you could engage in further research and discussion. I'm not saying forever, but at least until there's enough evidence to convince the undecideds. Right now, if you presented your "conclusions" to most undecideds they would laugh and swear off ever again listening to a 9/11 skeptic. <p></p><i></i>