by FourthBase » Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:19 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>There are simply <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>too many</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> eyewitness accounts from members of our emergency services – police and firemen – of multiple explosions occurring in rapid succession immediately preceding the collapse – far below the impact/fire zones. The sheer number of witnesses who immediately (and separately) referred to these explosions as being “like a controlled demolition” or “like bombs going off” is inexplicable in its scope – but, even more damning, inexplicable in that <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>these eyewitness accounts were intentionally suppressed by our government, have remained uninvestigated, with the evidence at ground zero (a crime scene) quickly removed and shipped to China</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>- How many?<br>- That last part <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>is</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> compelling.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>47 core columns in each of the two towers appeared to simply disintegrate, despite no damage from fire or impact from the planes. When one considers the inherent strength of an array of 47 core steel columns, with multiple redundant weight-baring support beams in place, it is simply inexplicable to explain their total and catastrophic failure – in two buildings – in nearly identical fashion.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>- There was something that lingered after the WTC1 collapse; was it the remnants of core columns?<br>- Yes, one would expect the core columns to at least create a staggered collapse, but there's the sheer weight and force of the falling portions to consider.<br>- If two identical commercial planes crashed into towers that were built literally identical to each other, then one might expect that the consequences could be almost identical.<br>- And yet, the collapses were <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>not</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> almost identical. WTC2's top portion toppled, WTC1's did not. That's a rather major difference. And the debris clouds from each were unique in their own messy ways.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Even if we are to believe that these 47 core steel columns were unable to withstand a progressive top-to-bottom collapse, and failed accordingly, certainly (at the very least) these lower floors, with their 47 steel columns and redundant weight baring support beams, would have offered up some resistance, and slowed down the progressive collapse. Yet, both building fell in approximately 10 seconds, at near free-fall speed. This is simply impossible. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>- I tend to agree here that the collapses were too quick and not enough resistance was demonstrated, but the time of the collapses has not been unanimously determined, has it? 10 seconds seems a little fast. Where can I find the exact times?<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>And, if we wait DECADES (as we did with all of these other crimes) to determine the horrible truth – that YES the USA did indeed orchestrate terrorist attacks all over the world, for over a century, as a tool of imperial design – and if we WAIT decades for the ultimate evidence to emerge, as it has now, that the USA has launched one false flag operation after another throughout its sordid history – and if we WAIT decades for the books to be thrown open and the government to finally admit its guilt (as it has done now with its crimes against humanity that are now long buried in our history, for which no one living can now be held accountable),…. it will be too late.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>- True, but if we rush into the public sphere touting conclusions that are not supported as close to 100% as possible by the facts, then we will be doomed to the unheard fringe.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
