Pentagon Video to be released today

[ThePistol44]

i'm going to see if wolf blitzer covers it on CNN at 4:00. I'll let you know what he says...<br><br>this could help spread the word of government coverup because this video was supposed to clear it up... but it obviously only adds more fuel to the fire.<br><br>public psy-ops maybe... but either way it will bring attention to the giant holes in the government's story. <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :x --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/sick.gif ALT=":x"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>WTF, why did I think they were a non-partisan group?<br> <p></p><i></i>

[Asta]

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060516130609990009&ncid=NWS00010000000001">articles.news.aol.com/new...0000000001</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>You won't need to sign in. <br><br>The comments are interesting. Everyone is asking "Where's the plane!!!! <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

holy crap fourth base, lol. <p>_________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

[ThePistol44]

CNN and MSNBC covered the release of the video. CNN had their "Pentagon correspondant" and he naturally only addressed that the video was released and that conspiracy theories were absurd because of "all the evidence" we have that supports the official story. Wow. <br><br>Of course, he described the white streak as a fuselage, etc without even mentioning that absolutely nothing on the video is clear enough to say that it was an American Airlines 757.<br><br>I switched back to MSNBC and their commentator for Dan Abrams' show finished by saying "It's just one of those strange things the government does" referring to the release of the tape. It didn't get back in time to see what the exact context was.<br><br>I am going to try to catch a repeat of the Abrams Report later (I think MSNBC replays it at night). It seems their "expert" treated the topic a little more fairly and intellectually honest.<br><br><br>C'mon journalists! There are Pulitzers to be won if anyone has the balls to take up this story in the MSM!! <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thepistol44@rigorousintuition>ThePistol44</A> at: 5/16/06 3:16 pm<br></i>

[dugoboy]

wow good find Asta. there is no way in hell thats a jumbo jet.<br><br>bret baier is the name of the FOX pentagon reporter. <p>_________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/16/06 3:30 pm<br></i>

[FourthBase]

#1 - In the first frame in which the white blur appears, something seems to be sticking up and out of what is supposed to be the nose of the plane.<br>#2 - In the next frame, there's both the undamaged white blur of the plane <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>before</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> it penetrates the building <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>and</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> a huge fireball explosion. How is that supposed to be possible? With the WTC2, there's an eerie moment when the plane (or what's left of it) has finished penetrated the building, has yet to exit the other side, and nothing has visibly exploded yet. Apparently, the Pentagon plane didn't have that kind of patience. <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

i noticed the impatient pentagon wall too. lol.<br><br>here is a 2 and half minute clip of when FOX news first unveiled the new video ala infowars.com<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/video_pentagon_new_video_fox_news.htm" target="top">FOX News: DOD Releases New Pentagon 9/11 "Video"</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>1. the reporters note there are 2 video security cameras<br><br>2. this new video is different than the one released in march 2002, but shows exactly the same thing.<br><br>3. shepard smith says "is that all?" <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Alex Jones take on the situation:<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/pentagon_plane_release.htm" target="top">Release of New Pentagon Frames A Tightly Coordinated Psy-Op </a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/16/06 3:42 pm<br></i>

[slimmouse]

<br> Now we appear to have seen it <cough>, your thoughts ?<br><br> <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>As expected, the no-planers are already preempting the damage to their theories by asserting that the video is fake even before they've seen it.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> More Psyops no doubt <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <br> In all seriousness, I really dont care if it WAS a plane that hit that building, cos either way the official explanation is nothing more than the customary crock of an official explanation that almost everything we percieve with our five sense reality is, when blurted out of official mouths.<br><br> But with regards to that airplane....forgive my ignorant scepticism that a plane ( least not a 737) went anywhere near that building - but with the greatest respect....... Im still waiting.<br><br> <br> <p></p><i></i>

[robertdreed]

ho-hum.<br><br>39... <p></p><i></i>

[Pirx]

Thanks Judicial Watch! The public record is now complete.<br><br>I look forward to it's re-re-release this summer. I hear it'll be in Sensurround...with alligators!<br>cool... <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=pirx@rigorousintuition>Pirx</A> at: 5/16/06 3:51 pm<br></i>

[dugoboy]

whats QUTB mean? <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

[slimmouse]

<br><br> You know what I find fascinating about all this plane stuff, is that if anyone slows down the tapes of the planes hitting the towers, and shows a flash or pixcels from a missile pod, then that is just bunk, but if the pentagon releases one angle of video footage which shows even less, this would now appear to prove that a 737 hit the pentagon !<br><br> I have to ask.....Is this really the best these saddos can do ?<br><br> But dont worry about me, Im just a crazy dont believe my lying eyes conspiracy theorist.<br><br> Too funny, or should that be a genuine ho hum ? <p></p><i></i>

[Asta]

Call me naive or call me slow, but it just occurred to me that back on 9/11 with the knowledge that the WTC had been hit and two planes were still out there hijacked, you would think that there wouldn't be a single square inch NOT being video-taped in the DC area. That the air would be filled with the whirrings of surveillance cameras as their mechanisms danced around looking for that great photo op.?<br><br>Of course, I am not sure what time the Pentagon was hit exactly, but according to the footage the Pentagon released today, the tape shows the date stamp as September 12. <br><br>Just saying.... <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

This latest stunt has opened my ears a little to no-plane theories. If the gov't had encouraged no-plane theories as well-poisoning disinfo, then by now -- today -- wouldn't they have released the other videotapes showing the big old plane? Or are they waiting even longer to pull the rug out from no-planers? I just don't get it. <p></p><i></i>