Charlie Sheen Affidavit (passing mention of 9/11)

by **Qutb** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:27 pm

"Let's start with the FACT that most of the "hijackers" are still alive" <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin">

by **Qutb** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:53 pm

"I'm still looking for the initial supporting facts that you seem to think exist. Could you please continue helping me to see the light?" I have no interest in spending time trying to convince you or anyone else who's already made up their mind, but there actually exists quite a lot of evidence that al-Qaida (or whatever you want to call'em) were behind 9/11. Of course, there will always be a lot of evidence that will not be available for direct examination by people outside of the intelligence community. That's just the way the world works, though many have a hard time accepting this. I'm not going to do your homework for you, but <a href="http://www.911myths.com/index.html" target="top">911Myths</a> is always a good place to start. "And what does Atta's will prove, pray tell?" ... "Where can I hear these phone calls? Also, what are they supposed to prove?" Now you're just being obtuse. "And what about all of the supposed hijackers' connections to the US military, FBI informants, Florida flight schools, strip clubs, suspicious, brazen and illegal night flights and the head of the Pakistani ISI who was meeting with Porter Goss on 9/11?" What about it? That means they didn't do it? BTW, I don't know of any confirmed connections to US military. Furthermore, "connections" can mean a lot of things. That word alone doesn't say a lot. "Didn't it cross anybody's mind in the entire Bush entourage that the grammar school might be the terrorists' next target and that they just might want to get Bush and ALL OF THE LITTLE KIDS he was reading with out of harm's way? If not, why not? Remember that just two months before, Bush himself had been one of the suspected targets of just such a terrorist plot. Is there no one in the entire Bush administration intelligence/Secret Service entourage with a three digit IQ?" That's very interesting, as are the movements and non-action of Rumsfeld, Myers etc. But it's a stretch to see it as an indication that the hijackers/al-Qaida/Bin Laden & Co didn't do it. Of course the whole story of 9/11 hasn't been told and there's a lot of pieces to the puzzle that are unknown to us. However, there are a lot of pieces that are known - why ignore them? The real world is too boring? Or too complicated?

by **Hugh Manatee Wins** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:26 pm

Have any of you figured out that you all could be right at the same time? As in, both extremist hijackers onboard (who knows their names) AND a rogue military-intel cell involved at the same time to bring about the day's events using the NORAD excercises, remote control of planes, and controlled demolition? Remember the example of Sirhan Sirhan and RFK in 1968?. Sirhan really was at the time and place of the RFK assassination with gun in hand but at the same time the murder was carried out by Thane Eugene Cesar guaranteeing both the crime's success and closure as the Lone Gunman is Made to Pay. <a href="http://www.webcom.com/ctka/pr795-2gun.html">www.webcom.com/ctka/pr795-2gun.html</a> Same damn thing with the first WTC bombing as an FBI informant reports what is about to happen and is told "let it." <a href="http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur46.htm">www.lectlaw.com/files/cur46.htm</a> Same damn thing with the Oklahoma City Bombing where White Aryan Resistance characters like Timothy McVeigh and Dennis Mahon plan to 'show the Fed' while an ATF informant (Carol Howe) keeps The Man fully apprised of what is going on. <a href="http://eyeonhate.com/mcveigh/mcveigh11.html">eyeonhate.com/mcveigh/mcveigh11.html</a> Patsies and alphabet agency parasites co-creating terror. But only the alphabet agencies profit from it. So try to integrate things as concurrent and inter-related instead of opposing theories. It may work out better than your dualist thinking.

by **slimmouse** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:29 pm

Thanks for that Hugh. I was rather hoping to have made the same point ; <blockquote>Quote:<hr>And all of the above evidence you cite, leads where exactly QUTB ? Shouldnt you be fully circling the square ?<hr></blockquote> The more I think about this whole thing, the more obvious it becomes that Sybil Edmunds has many of the answers on the tip of her straightjacketed tongue.

by **stickdog99** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:49 pm

I'm just looking for the evidence. You know, like the plane tickets and seat reservations and credit card receipts and the security camera pictures of these 19 guys getting on these 4 flights. You know, like their remains being confirmed using DNA checks against their living relatives. You know, like ATC recordings of the supposed pilots being checked against other voice recordings made by these 19. You know, like the flight school records Jeb Bush rushed out of Venice, Florida on a plane within a day of 9/11. You know, like the kind of evidence that might be presented at a trial of SOMEBODY, ANYBODY who actually knew these 19 guys and helped them murder 3,000 people. I mean, helping a terrorist to murder 3,000 people IS a crime, isn't it? So, nearly five years later, exactly where are the trial transcripts of the people who helped these 19 terrorists? Can you help me find this evidence, please? Because 911Myths.com is just a bunch of debunking of bullshit mis&disinfo 9/11 claims (combined with a bunch of bs of its own). It doesn't have any of the evidence I'm looking for.

by **Hugh Manatee Wins** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:07 pm

Jeff ought to have this pinned to the discussion board front page. From a retired cop's 1996 webpage about the Oklahoma City bombing: <a href="http://www.riflewarrior.com/okc.html">www.riflewarrior.com/okc.html</a> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>What follows is an investigative report (to date) utilizing the standards of: (1) Follow the money; (2) Follow the power: (3) Follow the players; (4) Look for Linkages, Consistencies, Patterns, and Coincidences (even those that appear remote), and discrepancies that obviously create problems with a final synopsis; (5) Look for, and attempt to establish, a motive; (6) Determine who had the means to plan, conduct, and execute the crime, then have the power to possibly influence the resultant investigation; (7) Observe the outcome of the investigation--was it complete? Did it answer all questions?<hr></blockquote>

by **dbeach** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:16 pm

new movie Flight 93 is jolly wood conditioning of the masses.. look at the heroes From my seat on this Titanic.. I C NONE! The govt story willl continue ad nauseum about the bravery that NEVER happened .. the passengers could have been in on the crime and now are very rich or very dead.. The govt can issue all kinds of records and logs BUT cannot find the missing bush military records.WHY? IMHO

Charlie Sheen Affidavit (passing mention of 9/11)

Re: No Qutb

Re: Charlie Sheen Affidavit (passing mention of 9/11)

Re: Either or Both.

Which is what I was trying to say.

Re: Which is what I was trying to say.

Re: Which is what I was trying to say.

Re: Which is what I was trying to say.

Who is online