Pentagon Video to be released today

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Youve seen a 737 Robert ?

Postby dugoboy » Tue May 16, 2006 6:04 pm

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>sorry if i'm repeating but i'm connecting thoughts:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>these images are the same as those released in march 2002. these images are probably released on purpose. grainy and hard to see. the pentagon was meant to be a honey pot. <br><br>there are many cameras on hotels, gas stations and parking lots that recorded the incident. in the minutes and hours after the pentagon explosion the FBI gathered all the security tapes up.<br><br>they are being saved for later.<br><br>they will more than likely be clearer and more importantly tampered with.<br><br>those doubting a plane hit the pentagon will get their hands chopped off when those yet to be released and more importantly <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>tampered</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> with videos will appear.<br><br> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/16/06 4:07 pm<br></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Youve seen a 737 Robert ?

Postby FourthBase » Tue May 16, 2006 6:07 pm

Forget the gas station, hotel, etc. for a second.<br>The Pentagon itself must be self-surveilled up the ass with high-quality security monitors. Inside, outside, all over. For them to suggest that this shitty little parking lot cam was the best image they themselves had is preposterous. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Youve seen a 737 Robert ?

Postby dugoboy » Tue May 16, 2006 6:12 pm

yea i agree, theres tons of video we have not seen. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Youve seen a 737 Robert ?

Postby thoughtographer » Tue May 16, 2006 6:14 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Pentagon itself must be self-surveilled up the ass with high-quality security monitors. Inside, outside, all over.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Though I've seen nothing to indicate that it is, let's assume you're right. Do you think they would release Pentagon self-surveillance footage to the public -- ever?<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>For them to suggest that this shitty little parking lot cam was the best image they themselves had is preposterous.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Maybe -- maybe not. Either way, it's scary as shit. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

MO

Postby antiaristo » Tue May 16, 2006 6:24 pm

Reminds me of the "Osama" videotapes (remember him?) <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Osama who?

Postby Sarutama » Tue May 16, 2006 6:28 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Reminds me of the "Osama" videotapes (remember him?)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Vaugley. He was tall, right? I remember him being all over my TV day in and day out like 5 years ago, but then he just sort of vanished. <p></p><i></i>
Sarutama
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pentagon Video to be released today

Postby dugoboy » Tue May 16, 2006 7:53 pm

yeah its official, this whole thing is about maintaining the official line on 911. i was watching ABC news world news tonight, from the 5:37 pm (cst) to 5:41 pm (cst) segment they focused on the 'new' tape.<br><br>they mentioned how the new video shows 'a plane nose'. then they showed a representative of Judicial Watch who said 'we hope that the video provides a complete picture.' then they talk about how Judicial Watch 'question what happened at the pentagon' and that they filed a FOIA and then sued the government to release it. <br><br>they next show a representative of 911truth.org (with 911truth.org printed in the left corner) and they didn't snip a crazy quote from him, it just wasnt anything of any value. <br><br>then they mention the hurt families. and how one family member now says 'if you think a plane didnt hit the pentagon your crazy.<br><br>end segment.<br><br>they didnt show the video from march 2002, they only showed the new one. for 35 seconds i'd say.<br><br>so again its official, this is the start of a public info war to discredit 911 truth seekers as conspiracy nuts, lunatics, moonbats, crazy or whatever term you wish to use. <br><br>interesting times ahead.<br><br>edit: thanks to fourthbase go here to see what Judicial Watch is: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch" target="top">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>this is kinda interesting:<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"Judicial Watch is a controversial American government watchdog organization founded in 1994. The group uses litigation as its primary tool, and came to public attention after filing eighteen lawsuits against the administration of Democratic US President Bill Clinton and figures in the Clinton administration. The organization was the first to expose John Huang's illegal fund-raising activities relating to the 1996 U.S. campaign finance scandal (also known as Chinagate). They have also received a great deal of funding from Clinton critics, including $7.74 million from anti-Clinton billionare Richard Mellon Scaife. [1] This has led to them to be accused of "abusing the judicial system for partisan ends". [2] Judicial Watch has also sued the George W. Bush administration for access to the minutes of Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force. [3]"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>heres where the videos are: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/flight77.shtml" target="top">www.judicialwatch.org/flight77.shtml</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/16/06 6:02 pm<br></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pentagon Video to be released today

Postby stickdog99 » Tue May 16, 2006 8:49 pm

Um, am I missing something or did these "new" videos show us nothing at all? <p></p><i></i>
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6705
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pentagon Video to be released today

Postby thoughtographer » Tue May 16, 2006 9:01 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Um, am I missing something or did these "new" videos show us nothing at all?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>No, but I can understand how it would be possible to miss it in this mess. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

What they showed us......

Postby slimmouse » Tue May 16, 2006 9:02 pm

<br> Was a perfect replica of what the world tuned into at the UN presentation, when Colin Powell stood up and presented his "irrefutable evidence" regarding Iraqs WMDs ( after months of speculation about whether such evidence did indeed exist) .<br><br> The philosophy appears to be , "if it works, dont fix it". <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

'Pentagon Video

Postby StarmanSkye » Tue May 16, 2006 9:10 pm

Alex Jones and R. Schlickeisen have it right-on here, and as others here have said -- This 'New' video is a Made-by-Spooks strawman foil to muddy the waters, divert public attention, distract critics, and divide the truth-movement. That FOX is even milking this 'news' to help justify the NSA spying is like the ultimate insult. I wouldn't be surprised if, after encouraging speculation to run rampant about alternative-plane theories, the establishment releases a crystal clear video down the road a ways to discredit the whole alternative conspiracy movement.<br><br>Bastards.<br>*******<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/pentagon_plane_release.htm">www.infowars.com/articles...elease.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>--quote--<br>This release of a handful of frames from the Pentagon on 9/11 is a scam. It is another scam in a long line of false flags and distractions laid out by the real perpetrators of the events of September 11th. It is an attempt to regain control of the debate when so many people worldwide are waking up to the stone cold truth - the irrefutable evidence of what really happened on 9/11. <br><br>And of course it is blurry video, just as bad or worse than first five frames released by the government but it doesn't matter because the general public will hear that video of the plane hitting the Pentagon has been released and will not question it even if they haven't seen it. This is a device used to simply intensify the whole debate about the attack on the Pentagon to the exclusion of other important issues. We will debate what they want us to debate, the puppetmasters think.<br><br>Whether or not a plane hit the Pentagon has become a divisive issue within the 9/11 Truth community. Infowars has never chosen to focus on it because the evidence surrounding the explosions in the Pentagon do not compare to the ironclad evidence we have about other aspects of 9/11. All we have to help us understand what happened at the Pentagon is a handful of blurry frames handed over to us by the government while we have one hundred percent verification that Larry Silverstein ordered WTC building 7 to be demolished - the evidence came straight from his own mouth. <br><br>We know for a fact that the hijackers were trained at the Defense Language School. <br><br>We know for a fact that public officials were warned in advance of the attacks not to fly.<br><br>We know for a fact that NORAD stood down on the morning of 9/11. <br><br>We know for a fact that documents outlining plans for flying remote controlled aircraft into government buildings as a means of inciting war, such as Operation Northwoods, have been in circulation within the Pentagon for decades. <br><br>These smoking guns, these incredible pieces of evidence, have all been ignored by the mainstream media and government mouthpieces. It is no coinicidence that they have chosen to focus on the Pentagon. This is the reason that we know that the Pentagon debate is dangerous because the debate has been manufactured to distract from the facts. <br><br>They cannot face the other evidence so they concentrate on the Pentagon.<br><br>This is an obvious setup and we believe that within a few months they will release crystal clear footage and place all the weight of the 9/11 conspiracy on that video. <br><br>If this is such a trap, then we must warn people and alert them to the layers of manipulation at play here. We must show others the irrefutable evidence that the media purposefully ignores. We must reveal how this is the most heinous self-inflicted wound, the most vile false-flag operation ever perpetrated by a government on its own people. <br><br><br>*<br>We asked why mainstream hit pieces always seemed to obsess over the Pentagon issue while ignoring other far weightier facets of the 9/11 inside job evidence.<br><br>The tactic has always been to create a straw man argument that can be set up and knocked down at a convenient time.<br><br>This is also a political boon for President Bush. The timing is precise and has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that the Moussaoui trial has ended. Bush's approval ratings are at 29% and his administration is being battered from pillar to post over the NSA spying scandal. What better time to replay the horror of 9/11 and attempt to reinforce fealty to the government's lauded efforts to keep us all safe from terrorists by taking our rights away?<br><br>The release of these images comes at a time when the 9/11 truth movement is at its most prominent. This is a targeted assault intended to quash questions about 9/11 and discredit the movement. TV news anchors are already uniform in their talking points in using the video images to attack 9/11 skeptics.<br><br>What remains clear is the fact that news networks are steadfast to ask questions about the real issues surrounding 9/11, such as the implosion of Building 7, the NORAD stand down and the fact that all the evidence points towards the hijackers being US government agents. <br><br>(Thanks for the Infowars link!)<br> <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pentagon Video to be released today

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue May 16, 2006 9:12 pm

Wasn't there a recent post about new questioning over the Zapruder film? While there is much to that story, I wonder if the timing was meant to make it a binary agent of doubt and confusion with this Pentagon 9/11 video story. Hmm.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Um, am I missing something or did these "new" videos show us nothing at all?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>They show us that laughable scraps are thrown to the pack as a distraction when<br>-Karl Rove gets indicted <br>-the CIA Director quits <br>-the NSA scandal blows up larger<br>-Bushes ratings are in melt down<br>-worse is yet to come<br>and people won't go on summer vacation and dissipate 'public opinion' for weeks yet.<br><br>Besides the on the ground security camera matrix at the Pentagon, does anyone doubt that the GSA's spy satellite system has amazingly clear photos of all of DC from 9/11? <br><br>The real thing to hide is any image of US military vulnerability, not just 9/11 evidence. This is standard military doctrine on not giving comfort to the enemy and why, for instance, the gaping hole in the <br>USS Cole in Yemen was covered with a big tarp to prevent the world from seeing the success of the boat-bombers.<br><br>Photos of successful attacks must be squelched at all cost.<br>Same reasoning behind hiding the returning flag-draped coffins.<br><br>I believe the planes of 9/11 were remote-controlled and the Pentagon was hit (ala Pearl Harbor) to imbue a renewed fighting spirit of vengeance and sense of mission into all of American military personnel to get over the 'Peace Malaise' which the military industrial complex was suffering after the Cold War.<br><br>Motivation is everything, right? We primates have old brains that suffer mission void unless we have an urgent task in hand. <br><br>"I'll give you something to cry about!" <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Funny, funny, funny.....

Postby slimmouse » Tue May 16, 2006 9:22 pm

<br> I have been made to feel embarrassed speaking of the pod theory, or the "Flash prior to contact" theory........ with regard to the Twin towers.<br><br> <br><br> Im just therefore wondering, why exactly the "Plane hit the pentagon" theorists arent embarrassed by this latest pile of bullshit evidence ?<br><br> More double bluff deep cover Psyops by the PTB ?<br><br> Or more evidence of an arrogant, ignorant bunch of Sickos, who appear to be able to present anything as "evidence" these days, and continue the age old meme of divide and conquer.<br><br> It really is as old as the hills you know. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Pentagon Video to be released today

Postby BannedfromDU » Tue May 16, 2006 9:29 pm

Jamie McIntyre is lying his ass off saying today that he saw the cockpit, fusilodge, etc...let us review what he said just outside the Pentagon that day-<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.global-conspiracies.com/cnn_reported_no_plane_hit_pentagon.htm">www.global-conspiracies.c...ntagon.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I guess his memory kinda changed.<br><br>------------<br><br>My official response is as follows- <br><br>You've GOT to be kidding me. Is THIS it? All the hype over THIS?! This is the same crappy video I've seen 100's of times...and with no plane in any of the 5 frames. Same bullshit video. I'm not even fully aboard the 'no plane' theory, but this video is rehashed bullshit. I would love to see something other than the 5 blury frames. Maybe something from the 10s if not 100's of film footage that HAD to be recorded at the most heavily defended/watched military complex in the world. Nope. <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Pentagon Video

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue May 16, 2006 9:39 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>FOX is even milking this 'news' to help justify the NSA spying <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Now that makes spin-cycle sense. <br><br>I suspect that any number of 'stories' are sitting on a shelf ready to be applied as counter-weight or distraction when 'hostile info' enters the news cycle. Rather like a pest-control arsenal for different kinds of bugs.<br><br>If Iraq gets too heavy, rerun a Katrina story. <br>If Katrina gets too heavy, rerun a 9/11 story.<br><br>Throw the stick. "Fetch!"" <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests