Pentagon Video to be released today

[smithtalk]

qutb, i'd say you were pretty quick to chime in with this,<br><br>"As expected, the no-planers are already preempting the damage to their theories by asserting that the video is fake even before they've seen it.<br><br>"Fitting the facts around the policy"."<br><br>so now the video has been released with much fanfare across all global media and it shows absolutely sod all of any value,<br>anymore smart little quips or dispariging comments,<br>you seem to have gone awful quiet <p></p><i></i>

[NewKid]

<br><br>So what's the difference between the CNN images and these?<br><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.flight77.info/govtreply/govermentsreply10.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><br>I'm glad they withheld this stuff from the Moussaoui case. <br><br>Sure wouldn't want to have prejudiced the jury. <br><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui" target="top">www.rcfp.org/moussaoui</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><br>Wow. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[yathrib]

I remain agnostic on the whole 9/11 thing, leaning more toward lihop than mihop. Admittedly, there are many things that are answered much better by mihop.<br><br>In any case, the video they've released proves *nothing.* The newsbimbos are telling us what we're supposed to be seeing, but at best all there is to be seen is some sort of object hitting the pentagon, and we knew that already. It is also highly suspicious that this was released years after the fact. The excuse given by the pentagon and the NBs was that it was "evidence" in the Stalinist show trial of delusional wannabe terrorist Moussaoui. This certainly doesn't lessen *my* suspicions... <p></p><i></i>

[NewKid]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In any case, the video they've released proves *nothing.* <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Well, I don't know about that. <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=87321&mesg_id=87335" target="top">www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=87321&mesg_id=87335</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

[professorpan]

Hmmm, it almost seems as if the video was released to add fuel to the conspiratorial fires. Now why would they (whoever they are) do that?<br><br>One possibility (deep into the realm of speculation): <br><br>Releasing an absolutely meaningless piece of footage calls attention to 9/11 conspiracy theories in general, and the Pentagon "no plane" theory in particular. (I don't buy into the no-plane theory, but that's inconsequential.)<br><br>Thanks to "Loose Change," the "no plane" theory has been getting a lot of attention. When my kooky, Bush-loving relatives (god bless 'em) started sending me links to the documentary and others like it, I knew this meme had really taken off.<br><br>The mainstream media aversion to anything "conspiracy" requires a public debunking/smearing. The lapdogs comply by suggesting those who don't believe a plane hit the Pentagon are crazy... even though anyone with functioning eyes can see that the new tape shows <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>nothing resembling a freakin' plane.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>And thanks to the public/media framing of anything that questions the official 9/11 story as "conspiracy," all researchers with alternate explanations are tarred as tin-foil hat-wearing "conspiracy nuts."<br><br>If they are that smart, it would be a very clever PSYOP. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

It's like a factory is cranking out scarecrows and tarbabys -- as soon as a new one rolls off the conveyor belt and hits the stage, the fringe virtually LIGHTS UP with activity. This place seems dead and lifeless most of the time, in contrast to times like now, when there's a "hot" September 11th story burning up the usual wires.<br><br>"How high?" <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/16/06 11:46 pm<br></i>

[FourthBase]

Thoughtographer blesses us with a depressing truth.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[NewKid]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>If they are that smart, it would be a very clever PSYOP<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>Or seance. <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2006/4/27/14467/8577" target="top">www.boomantribune.com/story/2006/4/27/14467/8577</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/AAangleton1.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

professorpan, i had no idea loose change was making its way through the internet so wide spreadly. maybe this is what is behind the fierce push to corporatize the internet thats been talked about so much in the last 2 months. and NBC's obsessive news focus on internet sex predators. and it also explains why they'd release these pictures.<br><br>but to my main point: trust me this is a mass scale psy-op. look at this.<br><br>i just saw homeland security secretary chertoff on FOX news this morning. it was about the release of the pentagon video frames, he said:<br><br>"i mean theres people who still believe the moon landing was faked. this was released to hopefully stop some conspracy theories"<br><br>see?<br><br>and yes they released these shitty, grainy pictures for a reason. if you read through this statement <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.flight77.info/" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">here</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> you will <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>see that the government has 85 video recordings including 1 CDROM</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> of the area where the 'plane' hit the pentagon. including recordings from the sheraton hotel, citgo gas station, doubletree bank, parkin lots and the highway cams. <br><br>after a certain amount of time after they see how the public responds to this current crop of pictures they will probably release a much more clear but more importantly <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>tampered and edited</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> video so that they can <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>cut the hand off those who have their hand in the honey pot claiming there was no plane</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->. i'm not saying flight 77 did hit the pentagon, no, i'm saying this is what they want us to believe. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/17/06 9:03 am<br></i>

[dugoboy]

heres what NewKid was linking to:<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b338/merc_mercy_/pentstrike3.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>this is pretty interesting, maybe if those video frames hadn't been released in march 2002, this is what we would've seen yesterday.<br><br>wow, i just found this site: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.libertyseed.org/expose.htm" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">A Photographic Analysis of the Staged Attack on the Pentagon</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <br><br>heres what the pentagon crash site looked like 2 DAYS AFTER the 'crash':<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.libertyseed.org/Evidence/24.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/17/06 9:32 am<br></i>

[thrulookingglass]

Dugoboy, do you know the origin of the doctored pentagon strike video? It actually well illustrates that the damage should've been more extensive if a 757 did strike the building. Also, the engines in the doctored vid/frames would've clearly left a mark on the Pent. lawn, or damaged some wire spools... <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

lookinglass go here:<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=87321&mesg_id=87335" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=87321&mesg_id=87335</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

hmm... hope he asked before he used. lol<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/170506reallylook.htm" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">How Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

[robertdreed]

73 <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

Is that really a true scale?<br>Would the plane's tail be as high as the Pentagon?<br><br>If so, then I'm leaning even more toward no-plane. <p></p><i></i>