To lie on the scale that George W. Bush has, one needs two distinctly compartmentalized persona, using separate vocabulary systems, to record and process life's experience, a duality which we can neatly label the "covert," and "public." Mr. Hill jumps to a conclusion, when he hears in Bush’s voice what most people will identify as the moment of panic one feels when one is caught out in a lie, triggered when he misspeaks by using the word "explosions," instead of a likely alternate, like "crashes," in reference to what happened at the World Trade Center on 9-11.
Mr. Hill rightly "loads" the word explosions with connotations like pre-planted, and Marvin Bush, the presidential cousin and WTC security honcho, but is that enough?. Without knowing the context of President Bush's address, whether he was reading a script or speaking extemporaneously, it is hard to make any logical sense of the glitch, especially given Bush’s notorious psycho-neural linguistic buffoonery (which I think we’ll see is itself a false-identity-flaging operation.)
Sticking with Mr. Hill’s analysis, Bush can’t be reading from a script (what word did he confound with “explosions,”) although he sounds as if he was reading, so it is likely he prepared for this statement by memorizing a script, which accounts for his speaking in a more forceful and rapid manner than he usually does. But he doesn’t trip up the recitation by saying explosions, for crashes, but rather, I submit, by inverting the words point and high, which he himself corrects, saying,
“Khalid Sheik Mohammad told us the operatives were instructed to ensure that the explosions went off at a high poi…at a point that was high enough…to prevent people trapped above…from escaping."
This is in exact psycho-neural linguistic symmetry with the Pentagon eyewitness Dawn Vignola who let slip that unfortunately, it appeared that the way in which the airplane hit the Pentagon did not result in much visible damage to the building. Who's side is she on?
Revealed is that the conspirators anticipated the effect the plane crashes would have on chances for surviving above and below the level of impact, which is what subsequent reality bore out, but combined is a discordant expression of care--the projections of a false-flag conspiring President concerned with minimizing casualties, onto the plot of a freedom-hating ideological terrorist anarchistically bent on just the opposite.
A control over who would die was also paramount in planning the attack at the Pentagon, and it resulted in a scenario so bent out of shape that no piece fits together without dislodging another. And this concern doesn't mean valor carried the day. It means a second American Civil War began on September 11, 2001 and there will be no honor there.
It is said that good people cannot imagine the motives and operations of bad people, and that bad people cannot conceive of the existence of good people, and I believe this to be true. It is a Hoppsian polarity I learned the hard way in a painful life experience several years ago, when a trusted fiduciary was able to take advantage of a situation through my inability to conceive of anybody who could stoop so low. The big lie is predicated on the inconceivability that people stoop so low on a scale so vast.
And by way of another life experience, I actually understand the rational underlying the acts of bad people. A few years ago, when I was involved in local town politics, I sat on the democratic committee, which rented a headquarters on the highway. One morning, the committee chair arrived to see the opponent’s campaign poster stapled to a telephone pole directly in front of the building. Thinking to himself, “Come on guys,” he went outside to rip it down. As he did so, a dirty white Cadillac with a “For Sale” sign in the back window, made a screeching U-turn stopping just at his feet, and a little old man, whom the chair had never seen before, starts screaming, furiously berating him for the act. The next night, in a coordinated act of town-wide vandalism, all 12 of the Democrat's large, billboard-sized campaign signs were destroyed.
It was a cheesy, intellectually vulgar justification for cause and effect, but this is exactly the way it works in synthetic reality. It turns out the man was a retired high-level New York City police detective, about whom much was darkly rumored. He was also a local Republican-party committeeman, who just happened to be the father of a popular elected Republican town clerk, but she told me he was at a Mets game the night in question, along with her son and husband, so that's three ironclad alibis at least.
I feel certain a legitimate plot of some sort was underway by Khalid Sheik Mohammad and his associates, but I have to qualify its legitimacy by the lessons inherent in the recent news reports of Idaho Senator Larry Craig, who pled guilty to the misdemeanor crime of playing a footsie game with an undercover police officer sitting in the adjoining stall of a public bathroom. The activity is known to some men as a coded signal of the desire to engage in sex. No other behavior, no solicitations or offers of sexual activity, were alleged. That police officers spend their days passively (or not so passively, in some cases perhaps) sitting in bathroom stalls as an enticement for others to engage in a coded behavior, itself of no legal interest or offense, is the slippery slope of future “thought crimes,” wherein people suspected of being at risk for potential violence because of their ideology, can be prophylacticly imprisoned without benefit of habeas corpus, the result of Bush’s Military Commission Act of 2006. The law against entrapment asks if the crime would be committed without the involvement, aid and support of undercover participants, and here we must answer with a resounding no.
Many questions surround the acts of terrorism America has experienced, questions as basic as who benefited, and who suffered, or who was punished. How anybody, especially the young men who were convicted of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, could come up with 3000 pounds of high explosives outside of an association with the military industrial complex, seems highly dubious. Federal “homeland security” agencies more and more resemble corrupt crime families. When Louisiana Senator William Jefferson was asked whom the $90,000 found in his freezer belonged to, he said the FBI. Former Ohio Representative James Trafficant made similar allegations against Van A. Harp, the FBI agent who went on to head the investigation of the plane crash at the Pentagon on 9-11, an investigation that looks more and more like a cover-up. But since Harp was revealed to have destroyed evidence in the Ruby Ridge investigation, without suffering any punishment--in fact, he was promoted afterward--coverups of government crimes are the sure path to career advancement
TWA Flight 800, "a proximity explosion that did not result in shrapnel or fragments hitting the aircraft."--the list is endless. The day of reckoning is nigh. But first the good amongst us must collectively awaken to these painful realizations, and undertake the unavoidable duty, damn the consequences that must follow. If that is a thought crime, then I’ll take my just punishments. In a nation and world as deluded as this is, one willing to remain so apparently, what I have coming to me will feel like just reward.
