How Can You Expose the 9/11 Cover-up by Starting a Blog?

[Arabesque]

How Can You Expose the 9/11 Cover-up by Starting a Blog?

The corporate media has proven that they are largely not interested in covering incriminating 9/11 information. Because of this, there are many reasons that 9/11 activists should run their own 9/11 blog or website. As I previously discussed, simply running a 9/11 website increases the visibility of 9/11 information when you link to other 9/11 websites, videos, and media. What are some things that you can do by starting a 9/11 blog to bypass gatekeepers and the corporate sponsored media?

* Reporting and Citing 9/11 News, Research, and Information
* Creating Transcripts of Video, Radio, and Other Media
* Reporting Your Own Activism
* 9/11 Research
* Critical Review
* A Note about Disinformation and Misinformation

...

A Note about Disinformation and Misinformation

Fact checking and corroborating sources is essential. Although this may be a tedious process, by being careful you are less likely to promote misinformation. What is misinformation? Misinformation is the unintentional promotion of false, inaccurate, or misleading information. Here is what I consider to be a classic example of 9/11 misinformation. It is often reported that “no hijacker names” appear on the flight manifests. From the 911 research website, Jim Hoffman writes:

“According to the official story, teams of four and five Islamic hijackers took over Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93. Victims lists for the four planes published by CNN and elsewhere are free of Arab names… This fact has been highlighted as suspicious by some researchers describing the lists as passenger manifests. However, these lists are not passenger manifests, but lists of victims… CNN describes its criteria for including persons in its memorial in a pop-up window labelled ‘About this site’… ‘(Those identified by federal authorities as the hijackers are not included)…’ In July of 2006 a large collection of documents was published on a website containing prosecution and defense exhibits for the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui… The faxes, reproduced below, include the names of the alleged hijackers.”

This is a perfect example of misinformation. As you can see, referring to “victim lists” as if they were “passenger lists” is significantly misleading.

When false information is spread deliberately in an attempt to mislead, confuse, or misinform, it is an example of disinformation. As I argued in my article, 9/11 Disinformation and Misinformation: Definitions and Examples, the official story of 9/11 itself is Disinformation—information that is intentionally promoted to mislead through omission and distortion. Official reports consistently fail to investigate, comment upon, or even mention blatant contradictions, contradictory timelines, contradictory evidence, and contradictory statements.
Conclusion

When it comes to 9/11 activism, you are only limited by your imagination. Anyone can get involved by blogging about 9/11 information, making transcripts of 9/11 media, reporting your own activism, making your own 9/11 research, and making your own critical reviews of 9/11 news, research, and other media.

By creating a blog and posting links to 9/11 information, you are taking part in the effort to expose the truth about 9/11. If only a small number participated in the effort to inform the public about 9/11, the results would be small. By simply creating a 9/11 blog or website, you are increasing the visibility, search ranking, and amount of visitors who encounter 9/11 information, 9/11 websites, 9/11 activism, and other 9/11 news, video, and media. Creating a blog or website and linking to 9/11 information is in itself taking action to expose the 9/11 cover-up.

A 9/11/2008 Resolution: Start Your Own 9/11 Blog!

9/11 truth activists often complain about the Corporate sponsored media (MSM) and their collective silence when it comes to explosive 9/11 information. As just one example, Dr. Steven Jones, Physicist Challenges Official 9-11 Story was listed at #18 in the top 25 censored stories of 2007, by Project Censored.

...

Why not make your 9/11/2008 resolution to start a 9/11 blog and become part of the alternative media to expose the 9/11 cover-up?

[FourthBase]

Code: Select all

How Can You Expose the 9/11 Cover-up by Starting a Blog?

You can't. You'll wind up preaching to the choir at best, mired in infighting at worst. Take whatever you were going to post (hopefully facts from cooperativeresearch not truther hysterics), print it on leaflets, and go to the nearest shopping center.

[Arabesque]

Code: Select all

How Can You Expose the 9/11 Cover-up by Starting a Blog?

You can't. You'll wind up preaching to the choir at best, mired in infighting at worst. Take whatever you were going to post (hopefully facts from cooperativeresearch not truther hysterics), print it on leaflets, and go to the nearest shopping center.

"Your first question about the internet and its role, there's only one thing that will move the mainstream media, and that's business, whether it starts to hurt their business, and it is, it has, they're terrified of the bloggers, and they're terrified of the internet, because they realize that it is taking business away from them, people are reading them... they're playing around with having their own reporters do blogs to try to co-opt the thing and it's not working very well, and there's a lot of crap on the internet - I would think that a large percent of what bloggers write is absolutely nonsense, and opinion without any fact, they're not trained as journalists, but the fact is that's very much the way it was at the beginning of the country, with the pamphleteers too, and a lot of it is anonymous, but there are a lot of important bloggers who are doing better work than mainstream journalists, they're doing it without pay! They're doing it because they want to show anywhere where the press is not doing its job, and they are feeling that pressure, and I hope that eventually as the newspaper business continues to die, they hire - millions of dollars they pay consultants to find ways of advertising the paper, television to get young people to read the paper - all this crap when they rather should pay journalists to go out and get stories. That's what sells newspapers. That's what always did. They seem to have forgotten this. They want just puzzles and horoscopes and comics, and whatever they can do to lure people to buy the paper. And the blogosphere is showing that there are people like Luke and others who are really starting to lead the way. And they aren’t professionals in the same sense of the training, but they are filling in where the mainstream press is failing - we've seen government run amok because of that, as you know - eight years of the Bush administration."

Sibel Edmonds Case: FBI Files "Formal Complaint" With Sunday Times
http://www.911blogger.com/node/17209

Please read my entire post. You'll notice I already commented about disinformation and misinformation.

You'll wind up preaching to the choir at best

This isn't true. Only by remaining silent will nothing happen.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Thanks for promoting promoting 9/11 Truth, arabesque.

Existing discussion boards need to have active truthers who know their facts propagating them.

And the history, tactics, and goals of CIA media are critical to include so people will know why the perps knew they could get away with it and why the cover-up works the way it does.

[redsock]

Arabesque:

I like your blog a lot, but is there any reason why you have omitted Paul Thompson's Timeline from the lists of essential books and websites?

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... ading.html

***

edit -- i see you do mention it here:
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... eline.html

[Arabesque]

Arabesque:

I like your blog a lot, but is there any reason why you have omitted Paul Thompson's Timeline from the lists of essential books and websites?

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... ading.html

***

edit -- i see you do mention it here:
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... eline.html

Thanks for the feedback on my website redsock. I've been meaning to update that reading list for a while, and I will definitely include Paul Thompson's site. I mean to link to specific articles in that post, but there are some good ones by Thomspon that I can link to. I do support the website, as you've seen in my review.

I have made some new posts on my start your own 9/11 blog series.

It's September 11th, 2008: Why Not Make Your 9/11 Resolution to Start a Blog to Expose the Cover-up?

[FourthBase]

Tell me again why you're not leafleting people who don't yet know?

[Arabesque]

Tell me again why you're not leafleting people who don't yet know?

You'll notice I never said "don't" do that.

As I explained in one of my posts, almost any kind of activism can be combined with blogging. I hope I don't have to explain that we live in the Internet age and you can reach many people on the Internet that you cannot in person.

To drive this point home, I had 1500 people visit my blog yesterday. I had to work and I could not do any activism on 9/11. While I was doing my work, my blog did my work for me.

I see that you have posted 4000+ messages here. That takes a certain amount of time and energy. So may I ask, if you have the time to write 4000+ posts on this forum, do you have a 9/11 blog, and if not, may I ask why? If you are criticizing my idea, it seems strange that you would spend so much time on this forum.

There are many benifits to creating additional websites as I explained in one of my posts.

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/0 ... art-2.html

[FourthBase]

Tell me again why you're not leafleting people who don't yet know?

You'll notice I never said "don't" do that.

As I explained in one of my posts, almost any kind of activism can be combined with blogging. I hope I don't have to explain that we live in the Internet age and you can reach many people on the Internet that you cannot in person.

To drive this point home, I had 1500 people visit my blog yesterday. I had to work and I could not do any activism on 9/11. While I was doing my work, my blog did my work for me.

The problem is that you have no idea who those 1500 people are, and whether they're just fellow 9/11 skeptics searching for affirmation, all 1500 of them perhaps. In the agora, however, you can be sure that most people who see a leaflet will be 9/11 ignorants. Quality > quantity. Not that you shouldn't seek the most quality possible. Spend some money on leaflets and have the balls to hand them out and get the message out on your blog. It would actually make an interesting journal, a diary of the leaflet action.

[FourthBase]

I see that you have posted 4000+ messages here. That takes a certain amount of time and energy. So may I ask, if you have the time to write 4000+ posts on this forum, do you have a 9/11 blog, and if not, may I ask why? If you are criticizing my idea, it seems strange that you would spend so much time on this forum.

I don't have a 9/11 blog because there's only so much time, and I have chosen to spend most of my free time and energy on this forum trying to figure shit out and help others do the same. I am criticizing your idea in the same vein: To help you figure shit out. I have decided this is the best possible way for me to spend my time. And I fucking resent you questioning it, but you're forgiven.

[Arabesque]

Tell me again why you're not leafleting people who don't yet know?

You'll notice I never said "don't" do that.

As I explained in one of my posts, almost any kind of activism can be combined with blogging. I hope I don't have to explain that we live in the Internet age and you can reach many people on the Internet that you cannot in person.

To drive this point home, I had 1500 people visit my blog yesterday. I had to work and I could not do any activism on 9/11. While I was doing my work, my blog did my work for me.

The problem is that you have no idea who those 1500 people are, and whether they're just fellow 9/11 skeptics searching for affirmation, all 1500 of them perhaps. In the agora, however, you can be sure that most people who see a leaflet will be 9/11 ignorants. Quality > quantity. Not that you shouldn't seek the most quality possible. Spend some money on leaflets and have the balls to hand them out and get the message out on your blog. It would actually make an interesting journal, a diary of the leaflet action.

I see that you refused to answer my question and are attacking me for things that I am not advocating (and even do advocate, which shows you did not read my posts). Clearly, it's time to move on instead of debating false arguments.

[FourthBase]

I see that you refused to answer my question and are attacking me for things that I am not advocating (and even do advocate, which shows you did not read my posts). Clearly, it's time to move on instead of debating false arguments.

Looks like I responded to your post before you edited in your question.

It's okay to say "whoops" now. Go ahead.

It's not time to move on, address my constructive criticism. Please.

[the_last_name_left]

you say "check sources" etc

But why do you just accept there is "a cover-up"?

if you don't have proof of a cover-up, how do you know there was one?

[OP ED]

you say "check sources" etc

But why do you just accept there is "a cover-up"?

if you don't have proof of a cover-up, how do you know there was one?

1. i don't. you're silly. what are your sources that there is not a cover up? do you have sources, or do you just have television?

2. because there is no proof of the official story. evidence that could vindicate said coverupers is being withheld. this implies its incriminatory value, yes? that this is widespread has even been fairly evenly reported in some limited mainstream news, but it largely ignored by 911 debunkers.

Stop talking shite. have you sourced the official line?

[i already know the answer to that question, so nevermind]

[the_last_name_left]

evidence that could vindicate said coverupers is being withheld.

oh. But somehow you know the evidence exists?

On what grounds?