by Sweejak » Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:18 pm
Well, this film makes a good case that the official flight path is bogus, but then it goes on to make some conclusions from witness statements that could be taken a lot of different ways, especially Loyde's statements, and holds on to its interpretation like a bulldog.
A lot of this is old news.
If the flight path is different, what took down the light poles? The film doesn't answer that but wants to forward a second plane idea.
The whole 'Pentagon was hit by something else' doesn't make sense from the git go. Why wouldn't they use a real plane, they did in NYC, and if they didn't want to use a real plane how about an old fashioned truck bomb?