Coincidence Theorists Guide to 9/11

[prophetlady]

Jeff,<br><br>Would you consider doing an update to your Coincidence Theorists Guide to 9/11? I am sure that, by now, there is so much more you could add. I would gladly kick in the price of a good book for you to update it, as I'm sure many others would as well. I would also be happy to disseminate to as many as possible, because it is destined to become a classic. <p></p><i></i>

[Rigorous Intuition]

It's something I've been meaning to do for a while. Thanks for asking for an update, it'll motivate me to get to it. <p></p><i></i>

[I dissent]

Of all the evidence that would yield names and suspects, surely the short selling of American Airlines et al would be the most fruitful. The names are there, logged on someone's computer. I've often noticed how markets seem to move in a manner contradictory to known evidence, well before a major piece of news is announced. The latest being the dollar's rampant strengthening against the Euro well before the EU referendum votes were in. You could argue that the result of the referendum was a foregone conclusion, but a month beforehand? <br><br>Perhaps this is what Sibel Edmonds was onto when she blew the whistle at the FBI. <p></p><i></i>

[glooperoo]

And maybe for this update you should first do a post listing all the topics you want to link to, or a rough draft or something, and ask all the RI readers to post in the comments (or on a board thread) any and all Mainstream Media articles relating to any of the topics. That would be ideal. Not that the articles linked to in the first Coincidence Theorists posts were quality ones, but many of them required the reader to go searching on their own to find the "credible" sources backing up the articles' assertions, and lots of people are just too lazy for that. Instead, it would be awesome if the update was designed for maximum influence potential on people that still buy into the notion that the MSM is the only source of information to be trusted. And that means we can't rely on essays on random "non-credible" websites if we want it to sway lots all those people that can see the looking glass, but haven't quite stepped through it yet. And there is SO much still sitting out there on MSM websites and other "credible" sources. It'll probably be harder to find MSM or credible sources for a lot of the historical stuff (I bet <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/">consortium news</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> has a bunch of good links relating to history but I have't looked into it yet), but it's worth a try.<br><br>It's just a thought. Either way I'm sure I'll continue carpet-bombing the web with whatever you come up with. Keep up the great work Jeff! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :b --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":b"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[st4]

Good idea, Glooperoo. <br><br>Here's a resource that I like to use when I'm looking for archived news stories:<br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://newsmine.org/">newsmine.org/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Their 9/11 archive is excellent:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://newsmine.org/archive/9-11">newsmine.org/archive/9-11</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>ST4 <p></p><i></i>

[glooperoo]

I hadn't come across that one before. It's amazing how much information there is just sitting around out there. <p></p><i></i>

[dqueue]

I just saw <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/14/17314/3651">a DKos diary</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> that shows the contract to construct Gitmo in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was awarded to KBR 15 months before 9/11/2002, while Clinton still held office.<br><br>Quite possibly meaningless. Interesting datapoint, all the same... <p></p><i></i>