Syzygy,9-11,Disinformation & the "X Files"

by **Seventhsonjr** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:43 am

Not be weird or anything but there have been some discussions that the Fox network TV show the "X Files" might be a foreshadowing and "innoculation" (Rove tactic) disinformation program/ . There has been talk of X Files writers/producers getting their story ideas from NSA types. I have been watching some of the early episodes (and later ones too) and was completely freaked when I saw the pilot episode (I forget the name) of the spinoff "The Lone Gunmen: where a jet passenger airplane is hijacked by remote control by forces inside our government (to be blamed on "terrorists") and is flown on a crash pattern aimed for the World Trade Center Twin Towers. This pilot episode aired early in 2001 almost 6 months before 9-11. In the episode the Lone Gunmen title characters hack the spooks remotely flying the plane and avert the crash just as it is about to happen, raking the rooftop of Tower I and knocking over the antennas there.. I nearly shat my pants when I saw it a few months back and I immediately showed family and friends who were all likelwise dumbfounded or pissed off. Tonight I watched the X File called "Syzygy" which was almost a treatise on the falsehood of Ritual Abuse (and satanic-like ritual abuse) where Sculley cites all the reseacrh and "evidence", including the McMartin preschool case, where the FBI basically had found that ALL Ritual Abuse cases are false memories due to poor interrogative prompting and/or mass hysteria (remember THAT word??? HYSTERIA). In the end it turns out (Spoiler kinda) that all the murders are actually a pair of psychic bitch cheerleeder teenage blondies due to some powerful astrological forves. RA proves to be a total hysterical fabrication in this episode induced by the teenyboppers to cover their weord psychic energy murders, BUT weird astrological configurations easily explain all the deaths and mayhem because the girls are , well, special, due to their astrology (they share a birthday on a time of an "syzygy" alignment of astral bodies which peaks as the murders increase) Mulder of course "cracks" this case by going to an astrologer (who charges his FBI charge card for a $300.00 reading) and Sculley gets proven correct: NO ritual abuse has EVER been proven and the FBI research PROVES that. Mulder, usually the believer, never gives the RA angle any credence either (it MUST be some weird astral alignment, Sculley, cause it CAN'T be ritual abuse, babe). NOW , the practice of "innoculation" and foreshodwing, mastered by Karl Rove and others, is the "leaking" of a story which at first seems to be plausible, and then is totally discrediited by facts on the ground. The public gets to haer the story through the grapevine and then the discreditting of the story gets HUGE media coverage. The two best examples of this is the memo "leaked" to 60 Minutes on Bush's national guard avoidance/absence and thr resulting discreditting of the whole story because the document (even though the underlying contents were accurate) proved to be forged. The other example of foreshadwoing "innoculation" is the James Hatfield "Fortunate Son" story about Bush's arrest, conviction (wiped clean) and community service for Cocaine use and/or possession. Rove was one of three sources for that story - told to Hatfield on a fishing trip. But the info was not whollely true (the alleged Republican judge who cut the deal did not exist in the county where it happened - only Democratic judges) and Hatfield, selected for this HUGE leak which had been scheduled for massive publicity and, again, a 60 Minutes segment, was found to be a convicted felon with a serious charge on his record (though a fair record as an unauthorized celebrity biographer since his release). Hatfield swallowed Roves fake stuff with the false whole hog, his contract with St Martins Press to publish was cancelled, books destroyed, the 60 minutes piece beacame a hatchet job on Hatfield AND, after publishing another story (he thought was a fake leak to bolster Bush's popularity) predicting Bin Laden and NeoNazis would fly remotely controlled planes full of explosives into high profile American targets in "James Bond-like attacks) in JULY 2001!!! Hatfield was found dead two weeks later, suicided by drugs and booze after a frame up arrest and seizure of his computer. NOW , especially after watching the Syzygy episode (and the 9-11 one and the bioterror one), I am left wondering what other psy-ops Rovian brainwashing and innoculation is found in the X Files. And elsewhere all over the entertainment media. Is this too CT? Is the X Files just a show which has amazing "synchronicity" with modern events and great imaginitive wroters? Or is there something else to it? I wondered if others remember these shows or have seen any recently and have thoughts on the subject or maybe an explanation of why this should not spook me and piss me off so much (cause I LOVED the damn X Files. Mulder and the plots usually sounded like me except for the alien shapeshifting reptile stuff). Are we MEANT to be innoculated to such "wacko" ideas as remote controlled planes on 9-11 in this way. Do we then immediately dismiss it as "only a movie" or only "hysteria" when RA is mentioned. Is this as insidious as I think it may be? Are we all pyshcically NUMBED and innoculated about the REALITIES and the foreshadowing which makes us think our fears are just irrational and "spooky" like Mulder??? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=seventhsonjr>Seventhsonjr</A> at: 7/30/05 11:45 pm

by **starroute** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:35 am

In fact, there is no way they could have been created on a computer. The typeface does not match the letter-forms or spacing of any present-day computer font -- but it does match old proportional-space IBM Executives of the 60's and early 70's. There are also irregularities in the placement of the letters and slight distortions in their shape which were characteristic of typewriters with keys but never occur on computers. In addition, most of the memos have a typed heading which is centered at the top -- but the centering and slant do not perfectly match those of the rest of the memo. This was a common occurrence in the days before computers -- someone would carefully create a template with a neatly centered heading and than make multiple xeroxes of it for later use, but the xeroxes would not necessarily come out perfectly straight or precisely centered. Also, one of the memos is dated a year later than the others, and the heading on that one is slightly different, while the earlier ones are all identical. For all these reasons, it is virtually impossible for the memos to be recent forgeries. Not that this invalidates your argument that the whole CBS business was a setup. But I get very tired of seeing everyone uncritically accept the line that the memos were forged when they were clearly not.

by **lilorphant** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:00 pm

Well, we began watching them months ago, beginning from the first, up to season four, and we also got the millemium series season one and two. Both series' together (both done by Chris Carter) very often give me the chills. I really didn't pay attention at first, I just loved the series, and millenium was one of my favorite all-time series, but was very short, only three seasons. But there are simply too many details in many of these shows, to think that there was not some inside influence, someone coaching Chris Carter on information, or someone who had access to see what could come down the pipeline if things went "according to plan". That the series was on Fox, indeed opened the door for them to become incredibly successful in the media world is perhaps coincidence? I doubt it. The show tapped into something, perhaps it spoke to the deep-seated fears that many of us hold, even if reflected upon only occassionally. (Whoever has never entertained thoughts on UFO's, the Lockness monster, Bigfoot, or the plot to kill JFK?) But the vast unanswered that is part of our American experience needed an outlet, and found it in the X-files. Part truth, part fiction, it fulfilled a similar function that it's predecessor, "Project Bluebook" performed years ago. To cull from the minds of the public any credibility of a particular experience.

by **FourthBase** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:10 pm

Dean What's-His-Name (Ornish?) from the Lone Gunmen said in an interview (you can find it online) that in the show's last seasons, Carter was taking advice from military/intelligence agencies re: plots. X-Files/Lone Gunmen, IMO, worked against us in a few ways. Disinformation, for sure. But also poisoning the well. Scenario D12, March 2001. Then when it actually happens, any discussion re: remote control planes and military false-flag ops can be dismissed as "crazy" X-Files ideas.

by **robertdreed** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:31 pm

Consider who's at the helm at Murdoch's Fox News- Gen. Paul Vallely, retired. Jeff has already written up Vallely here at RI- <a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/12/from-mindwar-to-foxnews.html#comments">rigorousintuition.blogspo...l#comments</a>

by **Project Willow** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:35 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Vallely is co-author of another work that deserves mention. From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory is a military paper on psychological warfare, written by Col. Paul Vallely and Lt. Col. Michael Aquino in 1980. <hr></blockquote> Wow, I wish I had seen that before. It's odd, I know a lot of folks who have just recently begun watching X-Files. (What is that about???) I have myself. I'd never seen them before and I was curious after talking to some friends. I've only watched the first dozen or so shows. I find them overwhelmingly traumatic to view. Alternately, I have difficulty suspending my disbelief because so many plot twists are patently impossible. They are over the top in their hollywoodization (is that a word?) sex, violence, miraculous rescues. As if one aspect of each story wasn't enough to titilate, they have to pile on. I think that in itself may have been part of the play, get people used to overwhelming trauma, or the combination of overwhelming trauma and bizarre phenomena. Seventhson, thanks for the heads up on the RA issue. Interestingly, in the first few episodes there is banter between Scully and Mulder about satanic cults, as if they are fact. So, at some point the order must have come down to cut that out. PW

by **robertdreed** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:42 pm

"The X-Files" was perhaps the only television entertainment program I watched on a consistent basis in the 90s. Not even "Seinfeld" could compete- there are still many episodes of that show that I haven't seen. ( As for the rest of it, zilch, pretty much. Oh yeah, "The Simpsons." ) I think I've seen almost all of the X-files shows, except for about three. It took the edge off of some of the research that I was doing...I had relatively intelligent and "hip", up-on-it friends who I used to bounce off ideas with, about all that. And Art Bell, too, from time to time. It really is just like Jeff says, parapolitical researchers can learn a lot from comparing notes with the "freaks", as well as by following the track of the big-league disseminators of Weird Tales on their own. The most anomalous X-Files story I watched had to do with the "satanic librarian" in an elementary school in a rural small town in the Bible Belt. It was a story that acted is if it was "to be continued", but it was never followed up on, much less resolved, as far as I know. I'm not even sure either Mulder or Scully were in that episode. I've only seen it once. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 7/31/05 4:04 pm

by **Seventhsonjr** » Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:35 am

I think that the main reason I wanted some feedback on this is that the issue of "innoculation" - this ultra-Rovianistic tactic of causing us to ridicule or dismiss that which is just "too much like the X Files" to be for real -- that tyhese stores were FED to the show in order to make us believe, for example, that an insider attack on 9-11 (MIHOP) is just fiction --- this demonstrates a very highly organized disinformation psyops methodology that has got to be operating at a much higher level than many of us are aware. It also demonstrates, at least to me, a more substantial network of complicity than I suspected at first with respect to a 9-11 MIHOP. WHAT IF these propaganda operations by the military-intel-media-corporate are MUCH more sophisiticated and extensive and virtually permeate the media and we just simply do not notice it. It is CRITICAL , from my perspective, that we examine and expose such operations and efforts EVERYWHERE, especially on boards like DU and democrats.com and even here at RI. The subtlety of these efforts (as in the "false" ritual abuse "hysteria" episode) as well as their obviousness (as in the case of the 9-11 X File/Lone Gunmen episode) HAVE to be more vigorously discussed and examined. Everything from internet news homepages and advertising to tv commercials and LTTE. I invite folks here to post some more examples in movies and tv shows where "innoculation" is at play. Maybe by seeing the signatures in advance we can predict the "next" 9-11 or other areas where there is a highly organized effort to brainwash the public on what they should believe if and when such horrors accur. I think in some ways the "Day After Tomorrow" served such a purpose, even though it was embraced by the environmentalists at Move On etc. I know there must be many many others and would appreciate if we keep looking and sharing on this, which is to me, most important subject. PS - With respect to the alleged 60 Minutes "forgery" - I do not have enough info to say whether the documents were faked or not weith minor inaccuracies: but the issue quickly changed from the truth about the facts to the alleged "unreliability" of the document and the 60 Minutes credibility. The attacks on Tom Cruise (his criticism of the drugging of America and the collaboration of Psychiatrists with the Medical/Pharmaceutical establishment) is another such effort, I believe (in spite of my critical view of Scientology). But the key thing here is that we alert each other to these efforts and discuss them here if possible to share the way in which horrifying events and circumstances are "foreshadowed" in order to innoculate the public make them blind to the truth when it is right in front of them. By making the public aware of these manipualtions and exposing them, we can make this tactic less effective and totally f*ck with one of the most effective Rovian [syops tools in the BFEE arsenal. It should become a meme that we repeat over and over and over: it is NOT only a movie. It is NOT some weird X File fantasy. It is the TRUTH and the liars are making you blind to it by feeding you prepared and poisoned media pills. Help me out here folks. There has got to be a LOT more out there if I am right. I think the RA coverup is just the tip of the iceberg floating alongside 9-11. There must be a minefield of icebergs out there that they are innoculating us to. Let's see if we can find them. Peace seventhson(jr)

by **FourthBase** » Mon Aug 01, 2005 3:01 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>WHAT IF these propaganda operations by the military-intel-media-corporate are MUCH more sophisiticated and extensive and virtually permeate the media and we just simply do not notice it.<hr></blockquote> If you know the number of known Scientologists in Hollywood, then do some guesswork as to how many closeted Scientologists there are in Hollywood (the more elite figures in production/direction more likely to be clandestine Scientologists than your ordinary actor), you might think that there is hardly a major project that isn't created by, coordinated by, and cast with Scientologists. I mention this because of the connections between Scientology, the occult, and intelligence agencies. If there were a propaganda campaign designed to pacify and control the masses using the suggestive power and geographical reach of TV/films, then a farm system of carefully manipulated "models" would come in handy. Remember the movie My Dinner with Andre, when Andre suggests to Wally that we are living in a trance purposefully induced by the government? We tend to focus a lot on propagandizing in the news media, but the propagandizing in mainstream Hollywood narratives is less detectable, harder to combat, and far more treacherous. Our emotional states are being manipulated. The very fabric of our daily lives, our most spontaneous and personal interactions with friends and strangers, is virtually prescribed by the Hollywood behavior headquarters. Our conversations - their tone, their diction, their content - is generally dictated by movies. We mimic our parents as infants, that's how we learn to walk, talk, gesture, emote, and even think. I don't think that the mimickry ends when you're an adult. Sure there are some people that evolve into sui generis creatures, and they in turn influence their circle of acquaintances, who are at least mimicking an original persona. But there are SO MANY people who are a composite of traits, tics, and ideas adopted from various movie characters, stand-up comedians, sports announcers, you name it. And realize, there are MILLIONS of people who have adopted a similar batch of traits etc. from the SAME pool of behavioral and intellectual habits, Hollywood. It used to not be this way. Before Hollywood, contagious ideologies and styles only affected/infected a precise tract of geography and culture. Now...Hollywood is a giant electric octopus with its tentacles probing the conscious and subconscious minds of our entire country, our entire world. There is really no easy escape. Quit watching television, fine. But 90% of the people you interact with will still watch it, and you will still be exposed through them to the behavioral viruses of Hollywood. You have to be really guarding your existential core to deflect the influences of movies and television, and you will suffer for it by being an outsider to much of what passes for society today. On the other hand, if you can cope well enough, you can also be the most interesting person your acquaintances will ever know, and your taint-free worldview and lifestyle could be a challenge and inspiration to all you know. Even if the truth about wars and dirty business is waved in front of your face, you won't be able to resist if you're emotionally warped or divorced. You have to be able to seduce people, but to do it with honesty. Seduce them to the truth. Seduce them away from the manufactured dreams and coercive illusions of the mainstream media. Maybe that's one of the benefits of the X-Files, it made paranoid truth-hunting cool. So even as it tried to co-opt and poison the paranoid truth movement, maybe the X-Files aroused a generation to take a dive down the rabbit hole. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 8/1/05 1:48 am

by **jenz** » Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:33 am

Seventh. an aside to this is that one of the ra techniques I have come across is to torture in the context of a mainstream film - ie re-make the film in nasty version. this creates another layer of problems for the survivor, both on the credibility issue, and on triggers. what you speak of is a variant of the con-man's standby of giving the answer before the question. there is hardly a news bulletin where this does not happen to some degree, an amusing exercise is to listen to the very early morning news broadcasts and compare them with the later ones. things get ironed out.

by **lilorphant** » Wed Aug 03, 2005 12:46 pm

"I think in some ways the "Day After Tomorrow" served such a purpose, even though it was embraced by the environmentalists at Move On etc. I know there must be many many others and would appreciate if we keep looking and sharing on this, which is to me, most important subject." Interesting thing, "The Day After Tomorrow" was a Fox film, yet the whole time it was out, Foxnews made fun of it, there was even an article on their website that it was a bunch of B-shit, and a fear tactic of the left. This is classic tactic of playing both sides. The intent I think was an innoculation of global warming as science fiction. The same thing could be said of the virus movies, the fear of virus and plague is put into the consciousness, there is reasonable belief there is a risk for such a thing, then there are contingency plans put into law, "in the event of". The reality phenomena of "throwing people off the island" is the one I am most worried about. We are in the mindset that people are expendable, and if they don't pull their weight we basically get rid of them somehow. There are many variations of this, but it is now a feature of our culture that has stepped up the competition for resources. The first winner was an ex-marine if I recall, and the show was put out by Fox. He now has his own show on a cable channel that teaches survival skills. It is the vogue in many parts of the country to be armed to the teeth, drive a hummer or large truck, be a survivalist (paintball scares me too) and frequently wear camoflauge. It used to be confined to the country, but now the militant attitude and style is completely integrated into suburbia. (which also has political ramificaitons.) These people are already mentally at war, they are gearing up for it, and who will they go to war against as their anxiety builds? The pundits think it humorous, but quite frankly they are responsibile for inciting the civil war of tomorrow. Constantly harping into people heads that the liberal left is responsible for terrorism, immigrants are taking jobs (while corporations and elites hire them hand over fists, and "patriot" bikers help smuggle them in) That trial attorneys are greedy and responsible for high medical malpractice insurance, while chipping away at the rights of family who loses a child, a father who loses the bility to provide for his family, or the mother who can no longer care for her family because she is in a coma. If Terry Schiavo had not had a pot of money from a malpractice lawsuit they would have pulled the plug years ago and we never would have heard her name. (On second thought put those limits in, so we are forced to endure another painful family drama). So I agree that the media is being used as a tool to subvert our American dream. However they cannot influence the market as much as they try. Example: Taser International. Foxnews loved them to death, had several interviews with the Taser people and basically pushed the stock, which then skyrocketed. They made big show of accusing "liberal" of being against the company, and how liberals don't want the tasers because they might be misused, and how dumb liberals were against the use of non-lethal methods of crime control, so the stock bounced higher and higher everytime Foxnews did a feature on it. Well, guess what happened? Several people have died from tasers, they were used on kids, and the new thing is that they cannot be used because they could set off a bomb if someone is wearing one. So the "looney liberals" were proven right, and the stock is in the toilet. I am most suspicious when it comes to market analysis on Fox. Anyone getting info from them is crazy. Many companies dedicated to sustainable practices, better labor conditions, liberalized policies, are creating a correction in the market where government has fallen too far to the right.

by **lantern** » Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:27 pm

Great topic. I have been interested in the manipulation via Hollywood and TV since I was told by a person I knew that Hollywood was full of mind controlled people, pushing the agenda of the NWO, without them even knowing so. I was also told to watch out for news of when people went in to rehab or disappeared from the scene for a while and then came back with a "message" or a new image, as these were signs of times in which their programming was being refreshed or triggered. At the time - it was a several years ago, before 911, this made little sense to me. I did not even know about the MK project at the time, I just knew about RA and the satanic cults at that time. But my attention was synchronistically drawn in this direction more and more and I started to pay attention. I think “The Passion of the Christ" was a mass mind control movie aimed at traumatizing people en mass, a form of collective ritual abuse (?)- I believe there was some form of subliminal conditioning that went along with this movie. I did not watch it, but my boyfriend - that is not a Christian and never has been- came home weeping and rambling incoherently about the Christ, evil, sin and suffering. It took me two days to snap him out of the dissociative state he went into after watching that movie. Mel Gibson from my point of view is a top suspect on the list of mind controlled people roaming around in Hollywood. Observe him as he speaks and you will know what I mean. The movie Signs that he was in, also falls into this category. Create trauma to imprint a belief system or a feeling of fear/doom at a mass level. Also Shows such as 24. Great show, very entertaining. However, in this show we are being fed the idea that 1 - hunting down terrorists is good 2- keeping tabs on people through high tech surveillance, following them, capturing them and torturing them to gain info is good 3- The US is good and always on the right side of the law 4- the agents at CTU ( counter terrorist unit) are beyond all laws and we like that, as the agents at CTU are VERY cool and we root for them 5- the terrorists are always on the very wrong side of the fence, bad guys, very black and white thinking 5- the American US president is wise and good and makes decisions that a wiser then any body else around. Now, are the writers of the show aware they are promoting an agenda? Probably not. My guess is that shows that are in alignment with the agenda are pushed forward. Shows that aren’t are vetoed – see JMS, writer and creator of the show Jeremiah on Shotime. JMS paints the government and military complex in a very bad light in this show and they cut his show in mid flow. JMS says he had great trouble with MGM in making Jeremiah as they continuously vetoed his ideas and storylines. He said it was impossible to continue working with them and maintain his creative freedom. So I think we are seeing at least three ways in which the media pushes out the agenda 1- By being run by people aligned consciously with the powers that be (top level of media/media owners) 2- By promoting people in alignment with that agenda only 3- By accepting only scripts in alignment with the agenda and rejecting or creating complications for the others 4- Through mind controlled actors/celebs/writers that unknowingly promote the agenda. Examples of the latter – Mel Gibson, Angelina Jolie ( look at how much work she is doing in promoting the UN ( UN as an instrument for globalization as at some point the agenda is that fascism goes global, through a UN based global parliament of unelected officials, just as they have done in Europe). I am nt 100% sure about Angelina, but notice that there is a remoteness there , as if she is not fully present in her body. Also remember her prior obsession with death and extreme sex…I have been keeping an eye on her for a while. And what about Michael Jackson- he upbringing would definitely suggest MK Ultra. Did he partially escape his programming? It seems that the powers that be have been after his behind for a while. Or maybe they just want us to believe that…things can get confusing. There are other shows/movies that I have observed as covert mass mind control – noticed how many shows depicting the secret agent- CIA as really cool there are these days? I even thought that A Beautiful Mind was an op. Showing the story of a super intelligent guy that had gotten onto a whole conspiracy trail and was in fact schizophrenic. The equation being intelligence (even Nobel Prize level intelligence) + conspiracy theory = madness. I hated that movie, I found it really patronizing and, as a psychologist and ex physicist, I also found it mind numbingly oversimplified. Like a kiddy tale admonishing that, hey, if you think too much, you might well loose your marbles and start connecting dots and seeing things that are not there. Another op movie, interestingly enough a Disney Movie: National Treasure – a story about the Freemasons and the founding Fathers, with all the symbology of the Illuminati that we all know about revealed. However instead of going into the negative occult themes, they turn it all around, painting the freemasons as good and turning the whole motive for the secrecy into the hunt for a treasure. This being a block buster, a lot of very nice disinfo there. It was marketed to kids and family, hence a whole pile of children now have the idea that the symbology of pyramid, the all seeing eye and the freemasons are all about these friendly good guys that were good at riddles and at hiding treasures of the good of all.

by **robertdreed** » Wed Aug 03, 2005 8:40 pm

"...I also found it mind numbingly oversimplified..." It's a movie about a book. What do you expect?

Syzygy,9-11,Disinformation & the "X Files"

Syzygy,9-11,Disinformation & the "X Files"

Re: The CBS memos were never proved to be forgeries

Plenty of instances in X-Files

Re: Plenty of instances in X-Files

X-files, infotainment and fantality

Re: X-files, infotainment and fantality

I too was a Filie...

Re: I too was a Filie...

Re: I too was a Filie...

movie truth

day after tomorrow

Media/Movies/Shows

"Book Treatments"

Who is online