UA 93: A compilation of all important analyses

[John Doe II]

I've made a compilation of interesting in-depth-analyses of this strange flight:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.team8plus.org/forum_viewtopic.php?6.1212">www.team8plus.org/forum_v...php?6.1212</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[DrDebugDU]

Just for the record. Team8 did a terrific job on 7/7 <p></p><i></i>

[Starman]

Outstanding; I cruised the index of questions you raise --Seems you've done an excellant job assembling pertinent information on this issue of what really happened with Flight 93. I've bookmarked your site and will definitely review the topics with the attention it merits, time permitting.<br><br>Thanks for your work on this and posting the link. Since I learned of the many anomalies and inconsistencies between what is known about this doomed flight (and the others) and the official story, I've doubted almost everything the public has been told by the PR pros re: 911 on behalf of WH and Pentagon. I tend towards thinking the 911 'hijacked' airliners were remotely-controlled, probably by a neocon-infected clique of rogue Intel/Military/Defense Industry idealogues to create the New Pearl Harbor pretext for the militarization of foreign and domestic policy via a global war on 'terrrur' -- and Flight 93 was most likely shot-down by an Air Force fighter to dramatize the faux-patriotic 'Let's ROLL!' close-call myth of heroic resistance against evil etc. It's hardly JUST coincidence that the links between the CIA and Geo Bush Inc., and AlQaeda/Taliban/Osama bin Laden, terrorism, WMD, are MUCH more extensive than any links with Iraq or Saddam Hussein. The many reports of suspicious False Flag ops -types of bombings, in Iraq and Bali especially, sure suggests a further continuation of American duplicity in an anything-goes, end justifies means strategy of tension as re: Gladio.<br>Starman <p></p><i></i>

[dbeach]

WELCOME to one of my ole pals <br><br>JOHN DOE!!<br><br>Kool get out the facts and take off your hats <p></p><i></i>

[DrDebugDU]

There was an interesting post about the Eisenhower Building a couple of days ago ( <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=861.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=861.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> )<br><br>So after looking into it there was probably smoke coming from that building, but nothing happens. However what if something went wrong with the 'bombing' of the Eisenhower building and they had to call it off. That would imply that they had a flight which had disappeared, but which had no hit anywhere. So maybe Flight 93 was shot down a lot later, because the attack on the Eisenhower building failed.<br><br>Just a theory, but an interesting one. <p></p><i></i>

[John Doe II]

Thanks a lot,<br>dbeach and DrDebugDU for the warm welcome.<br>Good to have a new home!<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[dbeach]

so now we have the corporat engineering of Hurricaines <br><br>and bush is hiding in some cave while cheny is in the hospital. talk about a jollywood script from some gangster movie. BUT after all they are a bunck of gangsters and we the crime solvers..<br><br>I have a honorable discaherge from the Military and don't take the dirty blood money like certain other pols..DA's ect..<br><br>hey bush is in a cave. Waldo bin bush laden is in a cave.<br><br> its a cave-in..or is that a luv-in???? <p></p><i></i>

[John Doe II]

I completely forgot to add the discussion of the departure time in to the compilation:<br>In fact there is a huge discrepency between the 8:28 BTS departure time and the official departure time of 8:42. <p></p><i></i>