Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:34 am

Copied from Prison Planet onto my blog:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://greencrow.iuplog.com/default.asp">greencrow.iuplog.com/default.asp</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>For your discrimininating reading <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>9/11 Dam Busters!!!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm">www.prisonplanet.com/arti...uspect.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect<br>Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover for attacks<br><br>Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 4 2006<br><br>The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.<br><br>Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President’s Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country’s foremost experts on National Security.<br><br>Bowman worked secretly for the US government on the Star Wars project and was the first to coin the very term in a 1977 secret memo. After Bowman realized that the program was only ever intended to be used as an aggressive and not defensive tool, as part of a plan to initiate a nuclear war with the Soviets, he left the program and campaigned against it.<br>In an interview with The Alex Jones Show aired nationally on the GCN Radio Network, Bowman (pictured below) stated that at the bare minimum if Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. He said it is plausible that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the attack.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough to stop the attack.<br>"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was part of the exercise," said Bowman</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>"I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that should be the object of investigation."<br><br>Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect behind the attacks, Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one person<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Bowman said that privately <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>his military fighter pilot peers and colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story behind 9/11.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Bowman agreed that the US was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship and stated, "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what we've seen lately from this government."<br>Bowman slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined." <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby robertdreed » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:43 am

I just saw that article, myself. Apparently Bowman is trying to get on the primary ballot for the Democratic nomination for the Congressional seat of the 15th District, in Florida. <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.bowman2006.com/">www.bowman2006.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 4/3/06 11:44 pm<br></i>
robertdreed
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby FourthBase » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:44 am

This is big news! <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:46 am

Hopefully, fourthbase....so many times we've thought 'This is it!' only to be stonewalled by the criminally complicit MSM.<br><br>How many times can they ignore the truth without self-destructing vis a vis credibility?<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:58 am

I don't think it's technically accurate to call Bowman the former head of the Star Wars program. His <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Bowman">wikipedia</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> entry describes him as "the former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations." There was no "Star Wars program" under Ford or Carter. It adds "he emerged as an early public critic of the Strategic Defense Initiative."<br><br>I heard Bowman a couple of years ago at the Toronto 9/11 conference. He's held this position for a while. <br><br>FYI, he's also the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://65.18.184.114/archbishop.htm">archbishop</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> of the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.united-catholic-church.org/">"United Catholic Church"</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rigorousintuition>Rigorous Intuition</A> at: 4/4/06 12:00 am<br></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby FourthBase » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:59 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>predating SDI<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>publicized date vs. real date? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Apr 04, 2006 2:03 am

Maybe something like that. <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.illinoistimes.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A4282">Here's</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> an article that fills in some of the gaps:<br><br>In 1977, Dr. Robert M. Bowman, head of advanced space programs for the Department of Defense, authored a report describing a new missile-defense shield system called the “Star Wars Defense.”<br><br>Six years later, President Ronald Reagan announced that his administration was pushing “Star Wars” — Reagan named it the Strategic Defense Initiative — but, by then, Bowman was having second thoughts.<br><br>Star Wars, he concluded, was not a defensive strategy at all but an offensive threat that would fool none of this country’s potential adversaries.<br><br>In 1983, Bowman took his opposition public and founded the Institute for Space and Security Studies, which became a sounding board for people interested in space and other high-technology issues affecting national security. In short, Lt. Col. Robert Bowman (Ret.), a combat pilot who flew 101 missions in the Vietnam War, became a peace activist. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue Apr 04, 2006 2:50 am

Bowman is the real deal, a true believer in doing Jesus' work, not Uncle Sam's. He's not a military industrial complex shill. He got bit by the General Smedley Butler bug during the Raygun regime and it cured him.<br><br>His brand of Christianity is similar to the Berrigan brothers.<br><br>I just wish he weren't giving his time to Alex Jones. ech. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fmr Head Of Star Wars Prog. Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspec

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:13 am

Alex Jones is the one who gave the podium to Charlie Sheen...there just aren't too many national podiums around for 9/11 truth researchers.<br><br>What is the 'United Catholic Church' anyway?<br><br>It seems you must have sprang like Boticellis <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Venus from the Waves</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> in order to be credible on 9/11.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>I'm still waiting for the MSM to reveal some interesting tidbits about BYU Physics Professor Stephen Jones' sex life!...Oh I forgot...they found out something interesting about his religious beliefs.<br><br>What was it now?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

The Commercial Mass Media and Bowman

Postby robertdreed » Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:40 am

(I refuse to refer to them as the "mainstream" media...I'm not going to say anything to reinforce their position.) <br><br>I find it very telling that I haven't yet heard Col. Bowman featured on any news or pundit programs on CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, NPR, CBS, PBS, or any of the rest of the outlets to a mass electronic media audience in the U.S.A. <br><br>Not even for a minute. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
robertdreed
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Commercial Mass Media and Bowman

Postby FourthBase » Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:42 am

If he runs for president again, maybe that'll generate headlines? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Commercial Mass Media and Bowman

Postby dbeach » Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:10 am

MM sold the USA for corporat gain...<br><br><br><br>Waiting for Truth from/on the MM is a long wait..<br><br>There are some problems with so called 9/11 researchers but the MM is owned by the PTB and ain't putting out any Truths that would burst their corporat profit bubbles..<br><br>AJ keeps putting out stuff and taking lots of criticism and<br>he ain't exactly gettin rich from his endeavors..<br><br>Katie Couric puts out lots of propaganda and keeps counting her millions<br><br><br>Bowman is everyman and the MM will dig out any dirt and demonize him...cuz it challenges their illusion of control <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

United Catholic Church

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:36 am

A lot of what I can see on its <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.united-catholic-church.org/">website</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> is admirable:<br><br>Though incorporated as a church, we are not just a denomination; we are a post-denominational fellowship. Our churches practice the inclusivity of Jesus toward the outcast and marginalized -- including women, homosexuals, indigenous peoples, minorities, heretics, sinners, and the poor. We even accept rich folks.... Like the early church, we ordain without regard to gender or marital status. Pedophiles and promiscuous or abusive clergy NOT tolerated, regardless of sexual orientation (no double standard).<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Policy on Pedophiles and Other Sexual Exploiters </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> [found under "What we believe" link]<br><br>We recruit our clergy, both men and women, from those who have developed a mature, healthy understanding of sexuality, especially their own. This enlarges the pool of potential priests, bishops, and deacons. We welcome into the ranks of our clergy those who are married or who plan to marry. We welcome those of either sexual orientation who are comfortable with who they are and are willing to enter into lifelong monogamous relationships with another human being. We also welcome those who feel a real call to a celibate life -- not as an escape from reality, nor as the necessary price for pursuing their ministry, but as a true call from God.<br><br>We reject the notion that homosexuals are more prone to pedophilia than heterosexuals. The truth is that pedophilia is most likely to appear among those, of either sexual orientation, whose sexuality has been repressed. We work hard to exclude such from our clergy. We try hard to avoid closeted gays. An essential part of this is assuring gay candidates for ordination that the closet is both unnecessary and counterproductive. We will not only accept them for who they are, but will accept their committed monogamous relationship as well. What we reject, from either homosexual or heterosexual, is promiscuity, predatory sexual advances, and pedophilia.<br><br>We are unlikely to attract pedophiles, because we avoid the ranks of the sexually immature from which they tend to spring. But we do more than that. We actively screen candidates for ordination to make sure they have a healthy attitude toward sex, whatever their gender or sexual orientation. <br><br>...<br><br>B: Reporting<br><br>Allegations of sexual abuse of a minor will be reported promptly to the appropriate law enforcement authorities, whether or not this is mandated by state law. Each diocese or local church will provide support for victims in contacting law enforcement authorities and ensure anonymity for the victim when they do come forward.<br><br>C: Removal<br><br>Whenever an allegation of sexual abuse is made, the clergy accused should be removed immediately from active ministry pending the outcome of the investigation.<br><br>Whenever a member of the clergy is found guilty of a felony or pleads guilty to a misdemeanor in a case where sufficient evidence existed to prove a felony, he should be removed permanently from active ministry, be divested of authority to perform priestly duties, and be subject to a canonical process for returning him to the lay state.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: United Catholic Church

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:39 am

It seems to me that there is only one question folks have to ask themselves in order to become a follower of the 9/11 truth movement:<br><br>Was there or was there not a 'drill' going on in the military on that day that involved flying planes into buildings?<br><br>If the answer to that is 'Yes'....then there should be no one left on the sidelines of the truth movement....we should be all in the centre....pushing for the truth.<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: United Catholic Church

Postby HMKGrey » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:19 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>It seems to me that there is only one question folks have to ask themselves in order to become a follower of the 9/11 truth movement:<br><br>Was there or was there not a 'drill' going on in the military on that day that involved flying planes into buildings?<br><br>If the answer to that is 'Yes'....then there should be no one left on the sidelines of the truth movement....we should be all in the centre....pushing for the truth.<br></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>======================================<br><br>Transcript of exchange; Rep Cynthia McKinney questionning Donald Rumsfield and Richard Myers. March 11th, 2005: <br><br>DR: We'll get back on both of the first two questions but the Congresswoman has raised the other question twice now, and I'd like to have general Myers respond, because you mentioned it in the last Hearing and I think it'd be helpful to get the answer even though we're on red, if you don't mind, Mr. Chairman?<br><br>DH: General Myers, go right ahead.<br><br>CMK: But I would like to have the answer in writing as well, as I thought my office was promised.<br><br>RM: Okay I don't know about the promise, Congresswoman, but could you repeat the question to make sure I'm answering the right question; this is a 9/11 question.<br><br>31:25<br>CMK: The question was, we had four wargames going on on September 11th, and the question that I tried to pose before the Secretary had to go to lunch <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>was whether or not the activities of the four wargames going on on September 11th actually impaired our ability to respond to the attacks.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>RM: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The answer to the question is no, it did not impair our response, in fact General Eberhart who was in the command of the North American Aerospace Defense Command as he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission I believe - I believe he told them that it enhanced our ability to respond, given that NORAD didn't have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day. That was an FAA responsibility. </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->But they were two CPXs; there was one Department of Justice exercise that didn't have anything to do with the other three; and there was an actual operation ongoing because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska. So we -<br><br>CMK: Let me ask you this, then: who was in charge of managing those wargames?<br><br>DH: General, why don't you give the best answer that you can here in a short a period of time and we'll - the gentlelady wants to get a written answer anyway, and then we can move on to other folks.<br><br>RM: The important thing to realize is that North American Aerospace Defense Command was responsible. These are command post exercises; what that means is that all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled; so it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real world situation. It actually enhanced the response; otherwise, it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions, those battle stations, with the right staff officers.<br><br>CMK: Mr. Chairman, begging your indulgence, was September Eleventh declared a National Security Special Event day?<br><br>RM: I have to look back; I do not know. Do you mean after the fact, or<br><br>CMK: No. Because of the activities going on that had been scheduled at the United Nations that day.<br><br>RM: I'd have to go back and check. I don't know.<br><br><br>In tennis they say game, set and match. <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests