Pentagon Video to be released today

[Pirx]

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml">www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11 Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today<br><br>Department of Defense Responds to Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act Request and Related Lawsuit<br><br><br>(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that Department of Defense will release a videotape to Judicial Watch at 1:00 p.m. this afternoon that allegedly shows American Airlines Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The Department of Defense is releasing the videotape in response to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request and related lawsuit. <br><br> <br><br>“This is in response to your December 14, 2004 Freedom of Information Act Request, FOIA appeal of March 27, 2005, and complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,” wrote William Kammer, Chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom of Information. “Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over, we are able to complete your request and provide the video…”<br><br> <br><br>Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request on December 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to September 11, 2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a January 26, 2005 letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. However, the Pentagon refused to release the videotape because it was, “part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui.” Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on February 22, 2006 arguing that there was “no legal basis” for the Defense Department’s refusal to release the tape. <br><br> <br><br>“We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks.”<br><br> <br><br>A copy of the video will be made available on Judicial Watch’s Internet site, www.judicialwatch.org. so long? Are they animating on an Amiga? <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Why so long? Are they animating on an Amiga?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Hahaha. I expect a digital zoom showing this guy in the cockpit:<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://static.flickr.com/32/51917480_d27cc02210_m.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 5/16/06 11:47 am<br></i>

[professorpan]

Very interesting. Please let us know when the video becomes available. <p></p><i></i>

[thrulookingglass]

"<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Very interesting. Please let us know when the video becomes available.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->"<br>Same here! Least now I know how Silicon Graphics went bankrupt. Too bad Pixar was busy producing disney fluff. At least they could've put an aggressive scowl, beard and turban on the nose of the 757 so we could know exactly who hit us! <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thrulookingglass@rigorousintuition>thrulookingglass</A> at: 5/16/06 12:55 pm<br></i>

[Qutb]

As expected, the no-planers are already preempting the damage to their theories by asserting that the video is fake even before they've seen it.<br><br>"Fitting the facts around the policy". <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Least now I know how Silicon Graphics went bankrupt.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>I'd really like to hear your explanation of why Silicon Graphics went bankrupt. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>

[thrulookingglass]

Do me a favor "Qutb", don't lump me in with the "no planers". I believe a plane hit the pentagon, just not flight 77 or any kind of 757. The official version remains a conspiracy theory as well. <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

missle/small army jet <p></p><i></i>

[StarmanSkye]

"Fitting the facts around the policy". <br><br>What a perverse distortion and wierd obsession -- The "No-Planers" may be wrong in misinterpreting the bizarre Pentagon-crash evidence, but THEY haven't murdered several-hundred thousand people, launched illegal wars, committed grevious war-crimes and atrocities, subverted rule of law, undermined civilization and international diplomacy, provoked regional crises, embraced torture and kidnappings and illegal spying and indefinite imprisonment, plunged the nation into unprecedented debt, poisoned the Middle East with DU, trashed protocols and agreements, repudiated civil rights, violated human rights, and threatened to unleash a cascading nuclear war.<br><br>I have no doubt the fascist criminals are capable of producing whatever 'evidence' they need. But why didn't they release this video before? What POSSIBLE bearing would its release have been to the Moussoui (sp) case? -- He wasn't even THERE at the Pentagon. The 'logic' that they didn't want to prejudice the case was just cover for a PR stunt. Likely the video WON"T show the plane exploding just before it hit the Pentagon facade -- which the evidence DOES suggest, a plausable explanation for the bizarre damage pattern.<br><br>Smoke and Mirrors. <p></p><i></i>

[Et in Arcadia ego]

There was a short thread 2 minutes ago about the video release over at democratic underground, which was just locked and disappeared..<br><br>Now why would they do that..? <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Now why would they do that..?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Why don't you ask them. Oh, wait -- you won't believe them anyway. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>

[isachar]

This report from AP via Yahoo is very curious. <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060516/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/sept_11_video">news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060...t_11_video</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>"The images, recorded by a Pentagon security camera, were to be released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, a public interest group. The video had previously been leaked and publicly circulated, but this is the first time the government will have officially released the imagery."<br><br>The AP article seems to indicate that the "video" that is to be released per Judicial Watch's FOIA consists of that from the Pentagon parking lot camera that were previously "unofficially" released. Recall, this consists of 4 frames (5?) that showed - NOTHING - other than what might have been a puff of smoke, a very blurry tail section, and a large explosion.<br><br>The AP report says nothing of the film from the Citgo, Pentagon Sheraton or VDOT cameras that were reportedly also seized. Now, if these are also released - and they are authentic - then we might actually get something new.<br><br>Like a large plane of some sort.<br><br>Like Starman sez.... That these videos were seized and withheld may prove to be more telling than their belated "release" may now reveal. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=isachar>isachar</A> at: 5/16/06 1:30 pm<br></i>

[thoughtographer]

This will function as one, gigantic, burning strawman one way or the other -- and I think we all know which way that'll be. Thanks for nothing, "truthies". <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

i just saw it. ITS THE SAME IMAGE WE'VE SEEN THE LAST FEW YEARS!<br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>i just saw it. ITS THE SAME IMAGE WE'VE SEEN THE LAST FEW YEARS!<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Of course it is. Maybe you were expecting the director's cut? <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>