UPDATE: Tracking the alleged hijackers and their doubles

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

UPDATE: Tracking the alleged hijackers and their doubles

Postby John Doe II » Sun May 21, 2006 3:42 pm

Detailed timelines and presentation of facts on all 19 alleged hijackers have been updated:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewforum.php?23">www.team8plus.org/e107_pl...rum.php?23</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>A good starting point is the summary of the findings:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2486">www.team8plus.org/e107_pl...c.php?2486</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(last post)<br><br>In some cases the existence of a double (patsies at work) can be proven (e.g. Atta) in some cases strongly suspected.<br>Here a good article why this can be considered a smoking gun:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x89718">www.democraticunderground...=125x89718</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
John Doe II
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: UPDATE: Tracking the alleged hijackers and their doubles

Postby dude h homeslice ix » Sun May 21, 2006 4:58 pm

thanks! spreading this one around... <p></p><i></i>
dude h homeslice ix
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:09 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: UPDATE: Tracking the alleged hijackers and their doubles

Postby dugoboy » Sun May 21, 2006 8:07 pm

my first response is wow. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Thanks!

Postby John Doe II » Mon May 22, 2006 4:21 pm

I hope people start realizing that the identity of the alleged hijacker and the proof that doubles were involved is a smoking gun that direcly proofs 911 being in Inside job. All this based entirely on MSM and official reports. <p></p><i></i>
John Doe II
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Summary of results

Postby John Doe II » Tue May 23, 2006 10:44 am

<br>for details check out the timelines. Link in OP.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>U P D A T E</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline"><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Summary of findings :</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--><br><br>Here a list of the results of the research on the 19 alleged hijackers.<br>Please read the files on the alleged hijackers you’re interested in for further information.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proof of an alleged hijacker having a double:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Mohamed Atta<br>Marwan Al Shehhi<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Very strong indications of an alleged hijacker having a double: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Jarrah<br>Hani Hanjour<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Strong indications of an alleged hijacker having a double: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Khalid Almihdhar<br>Salem Alhazmi<br>Nawaf Alhazmi<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Considerable indications of an alleged hijacker having a double: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Ahmed Alghamdi<br>Hamza Alghamdi<br>Waleed Al Shehri<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Strong indications of an identity of an alleged hijacker created AFTER 911: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Abdulaziz Al Omari<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Very strong indications that somebody with the same name entered the country before the official entrance date: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Saeed Alghamdi<br>Ahmed Alnami<br>Ziad Jarrah<br>Majed Moqed<br>Salem Alhazmi<br>Hani Hanjour<br>Khalid Almihdhar<br>Nawaf Alhazmi<br>Ahmed Alghamdi<br>Hamza Alghamdi<br>Marwan Al Shehhi<br>Satam Al Suqami<br>Fayez Banihammad<br>Mohamed Atta (according to Able Danger)<br>Marwan Al Shehhi (according to Able Danger)<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Comment: The case of alleged hijackers clearly being in the US before their official entrance date is by far more than only a proof of an inaccurate investigation. It is far more than that. The entrance date are documented by INS papers. Therefore we can conclude that either these documents have been faked by the INS then we need to wonder what could be so important to cover up? Or the INS documents are authentic than we can conclude that one person with the name of an alleged hijacker did indeed enter the country while another person with the same name of an alleged hijacker was already in the US. So, it would be another proof of having two different people using the very same identity.<br>Very interesting is the case of Able Danger: As Atta, Al Shehhi, Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi have been identified as a terrorist cell in January 2000 although Atta and Al Shehhi still were in Germany and Almhdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi only arrived mid-January in the US (but not in New York but in California) we can conclude that the persons being identified as possible terrorists can’t be the same that at the same time still lived in Germany or just arrived at the other coast of the US.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>People still alive having the same name as alleged hijackers: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Saeed Alghamdi<br>Ahmed Alnami<br>Salem Alhazmi<br>Waleed Alshehri<br>Abdulaziz Alomari<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>People having the same name as the alleged hijacker possibly still alive: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Khalid Almihdhar<br>Mohand Alshehri<br>Marwan Al Shehhi<br>Wail Alshehri<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Comments: Why did the FBI never investigate what the press at the beginning named “cases of stolen identity”? Has there ever been a crime where the investigators did neither bother to properly figure out the identity of the culprits nor to positively identify the dead alleged hijackers?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>FBI photos certainly not showing the alleged hijackers: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Majed Moqed<br>Salem Alhazmi<br>Hamza Alghamdi<br>Waleed Al Shehri<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>FBI photos possibly not showing the alleged hijackers: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Khalid Almihdhar<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Comment: Why doesn’t the FBI not change the photo? And what to make of eyewitness accounts who identified alleged hijackers on the basis of the FBI photo?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Alleged hijackers possessing documents they officially don’t have (special thanks to Kevin Fenton for his work on this topic):</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Abdulaziz Alomari<br>Fayez Banihammad<br>Hani Hanjour<br>Mohamed Atta<br>Satam Al Suqami<br>Wail Al Shehri<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>People having the same name as alleged hijackers having attended military schools in the US: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Saeed Alghamdi<br>Ahmed Alnami<br>Ahmed Alghamdi<br>Abdulaziz Al Omari<br>Mohamed Atta<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Comment: Since the Pentagon said that the people attending the military schools are “probably” not the same as the alleged hijackers the media completely dropped this question although no clear answer has ever been given.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Alleged hijackers having been under US-surveillance prior to September 11:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Mohamed Atta<br>Khalid Almihdhar<br>Nawaf Alhazmi<br>Satam Al Suqami<br>Ahmed Alghamdi<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Alleged hijackers being at one point illegally in the US: </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Ziad Jarrah (violated his immigration status as a tourist by going straight to a ful-time flight school when entering the US on June 27, 2000)<br>Hani Hanjour (since December 8, 2000) Hanjour didn’t attend the school he was admitted to. Therefore his student visa wasn’t valid.<br>Mohamed Atta (between December 2, 2000 – January 10, 2001). Atta even left the US without valid visa visa assuring that he can re-enter the country<br>Marwan Al-Shehhi (Mid-December 2000 – January 18, 2001). Al Shehhi even left the US without having a valid visa assuring that he can re-enter the country<br>Satam Al Suqami (since May 21, 2001)<br>Nawaf Alhazmi (since August 2001)<br>Khalid Almihdhar (since August 27, 2001)<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Comment: Why didn’t the alleged hijackers bother at all about being legally in the US? Why did they even risk to leave the country without being sure to be able to return? And why were they always lucky doing so?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
John Doe II
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests