by Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:48 am
The similarities between the 9/11 Omission Panel and Warren Commission are many. I'm glad the article goes back to JFK's murder and its CIA media cover-up after explaining what Norman Mineta revealed about an aide asking Cheney repeatedly if "the order still stands" just before the Pentagon was hit by a plane.<br><br>But here's a "HMW-type" CIA-generated movie reference. <br>(Oh, I mean 'maybe' it is, Prof Pan. lol.)<br><br>The author of the is article used the tongue-in-cheek self-deprecating expression <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"shaggy dog story"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> meaning <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>an extremely long-winded tale featuring extensive narration of typically irrelevant incidents, that usually results in a pointless or absurd punchline.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.encyclopedian.com/sh/Shaggy-dog-story.html">www.encyclopedian.com/sh/...story.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>There Must Be A Perfectly Reasonable Explanation<br>For What Dick Cheney Said<br><br>Even if the reader of this essay is not afflicted with the “reasonable explanation” meme of the chapter title, it is useful to know that most Americans are, both by natural bent and by CIA media-influenced control of the popular consciousness, inclined to accept such things at face value and not go much further. Although many folk have written about Mineta’s testimony, I am not aware of anyone who has taken the obvious next step – as we are doing here – of following up on it. That’s where the fun is.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>I apologize to the reader for making this essay a shaggy dog story instead of a sound bite</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, but there is a larger picture that is easy to miss in the forensics of 911. Since I began with a promise of evidence of a cover-up that you could take to the bank, let me now deliver it. Again, the simple interpretation of Cheney’s remarks offered here is the best: The attack on the Pentagon was required to mobilize the U.S. military that were not complicit in 911 to the cause of the specious War on Terror. An inside man in charge was needed to make certain that the Pentagon and/or White House did not use their anti-aircraft defenses to down the attacking American Flight 77. That man was Dick Cheney, as Norman Mineta inadvertently revealed in his elaborative association to Lee Hamilton’s question.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Good 9/11 analysis. <br>Now, about those spooky 'Shaggy Dog' movies.<br><br>Originally made in 1959, Disney's 'The Shaggy Dog' has recently been remade along with a flood of cute dog rereleases just as an MP dog handler is on trial for turning attack dogs loose on Abu Ghraib prisoners, the results of which became gruesome photos online of a naked Iraqi prisoner still tied up and lying in a pool of his own blood after being mauled by an attack dog. I've previously conjectured that America's Fidos are getting a re-friendlying-up so Americans won't think of Abu Ghraib everytime they pat their own pup on the head.<br>I could be wrong but I don't think so.<br><br>I'm more certain about the political theme, JFK's murder, in Disney's 1976 <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>'The Shaggy D.A.' </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->sequel to the 1959 original.<br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/6304500726.01._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>So now back to covering up the murder of JFK.<br><br>New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison prosecuted Clay Shaw back in 1967 for being part of the New Orleans end of the JFK murder conspiracy. Garrison even appeared on the Johnny Carson Show where Carson prevented him from showing Dealey Plaza photos by moving his hand when the camera tried to focus on it. NBC did a hit piece against Garrison and then gave him national prime time to respond to the smear. So Jim Garrison's name and message was known all over the USA.<br><br>lThe CIA infiltrated and disrupted his research team and the CIA-controlled media portrayed Garrison as just a dangerous social-climbing election-seeking kook. Gerald Posner is still dancing on Garrison's Mockingbird-pecked reputation.<br>(I put links to Garrison's trial transcripts in RI's Data Dump forum.)<br><br>Disney's <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>'The Shaggy D.A.,'</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> came out in 1976 just after the Pike Committee and Church Senate Subcommittee on CIA abuses revealed coups, mind control experiments, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>and assassinations.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6304500726/ref=nosim/104-3345849-5860714?dev-t=D2Y5TUCCVJ7DGE&n=404272<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Plot Summary<br><br> * Genres: Comedy, Family<br> * Tagline: A real shaggy dog story. The only candidate with a LAW DEGREE and a PEDIGREE!<br> * Plot Outline A lawyer makes an interesting discovery that could affect his chances of getting elected to office.<br> * Plot Synopsis: Wilby Daniels, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>a successful lawyer running for District Attorney, suddenly finds himself being transformed into an English sheepdog. Somehow he has to keep his change a secret</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> and find just what is causing it, all the while eluding the local dog catcher.<br>....<br>When the family comes home to find the house cleaned out by "movers"--who Daniels knows <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>are protected by the corrupt District Attorney</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> John Slade (Keenan Wynn)--he decides to run against Slade in the next election. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Meanwhile, hoodlums connected to the same crime syndicate get hold of the mystical ring that turns poor Daniels (via mid-'70s special effects) into Elwood, the dog</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> owned by the local ice-cream vendor (Tim Conway). Lots of chase scenes, a little roller derby action, and some cherry pie throwing <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>complicate both Daniels's bid for office and his quest to remain a human being.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>....<br> Theatrical Release Information<br><br> * <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>US Theatrical Release Date: December 17, 1976</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br> * MPAA: Safe::Root0::PI::Media::Description=HASH(0x6609764c)<br> * Production Company: Walt Disney Productions<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Such an awkward title and concept. Looks to me like an effort to discredit D. A. Jim Garrison's investigations as <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>'shaggy dog stories.'</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>To put a finer point on that year's heightened 'threat level' to the CIA, according to Harrison Edward Livingstone in his 1992 book 'High Treason 2-The Great Cover-up: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy' on page 395-<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>A key article that led to the establishment of the House Assassination Committee at the same time in 1976</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> was written by Wayne Chastain of the Pacific News Service and published in the San Francisco Examiner & Chronicle, October 10, 1976: "Did lawmen set up King?" Chastain was a reporter in Memphis where (Martin Luther) King was shot, and he was one of the first on the scene. He wrote: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"Martin Luther King, Jr., may have been the victim of 'security stripping'- a technique used by intelligence agencies to expose a victim to assassinations by removing his protection.<br>"This theory persuaded the U.S. House of Representatives to create a special twelve-member committee to investigate both the 1968 King murder and the 1963 assassination of John Kennedy.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> The black caucus in the House, acting on new information in the King case, was responsible for breaking a stalemate and pushing the investigation through, according to several committee appointees."<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>So 1976 looks like a very good year for Disney (CIA for kids) to take another of many swings at New Orleans D. A. Jim Garrison by releasing 'The Shaggy D.A.'<br><br>Maybe, just maybe.<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 7/11/06 3:03 am<br></i>
