by slimmouse » Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:20 pm
<br> Im just wondering when the sophisticates are gonna ask for some serious proof that flight 77 hit the pentagon.<br><br> Amidst many threads on here, even recently have been those which explain;<br><br> A) How Hani Hanjour - the alleged pilot - couldnt possibly have pulled off that manoever.<br><br> B) How the simple physics of the whole 7000 ft descent in something like 4 minutes, combined with a 270 degree turn is impossible in a 737 due to G- force et cetera - not to mention a flying moron at the helm.<br><br> From a personal viewpoint meanwhile - and isnt hindsight a wonderful thing you might say - I can remember thinking at the time - ' That doesnt look like a plane crash to me ' - before the mainstream media came over the top with "The official version".<br><br> I guess what Im trying to say, for all cautioning against such notions, for all the other more tangible-money-trail evidence which clearly shows that 9/11 was the obvious inside job that it was, why should we be in such a damn big hurry to ignore the in -yer- face physical evidence ? <br><br> That which will hopefully wake those people up - People who due to the ordinary pressures of life, along with their pre-conditioned view of how the world is - simply have neither the time nor the inclination to do the neccesary spadework regarding the real smoking guns, without perhaps having first been given something which is clearly tangible which acts as a catalyst to awaken them from their slumber.<br><br> IF FLIGHT 77 HIT THE PENTAGON - IM POPE GREGORY THE NINTH.<br><br> IF WTC 7 COLLAPSED DUE TO DAMAGE FROM WTC1 AND 2, THEN IM POPE INNOCENT THE FIRST.<br><br> Just my opinion of course <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> <p></p><i></i>