September 11, 1922: Arundhati Roy

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

September 11, 1922: Arundhati Roy

Postby jc » Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:49 pm

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=6PkHHAzbknc&search=arundhati%20roy">youtube.com/watch?v=6PkHHAzbknc&search=arundhati%20roy</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>Segment from the film "We.." where Arundhati Roy speaks about the Israeli / Palestinian conflict in the middle east. Historic references, who funds it, and more. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>History Forgave Churchill Why Not Blair And Bush?<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>by Mickey Z <br>July 19, 2003<br><br>On July 17, 2003, U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair addressed a joint meeting of the U.S. House and Senate. The subject of WMD, of course, was on the front burner.<br><br>"If we are wrong, then we will have destroyed a threat that was at its least responsible for inhuman carnage and suffering,' Blair said. "I am confident history will forgive.'<br><br>Blair's confidence is justified. History has forgiven U.K. leaders for plenty. How else, for example, could U.S. News and World Report have dubbed Winston Churchill "The Last Hero" in a 2000 cover story? In that article, Churchill was said to believe in <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"liberty, the rule of law, and the rights of the individual."<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>As Sir Winston himself declared: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"History will be kind to me for I intend to write it."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>This is precisely why so few of us ever discuss Churchill as a war criminal or racist. In 1910, in the capacity of Home Secretary, he put forth a proposal<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong> to sterilize roughly 100,000 "mental degenerates" and dispatch several thousand others to state-run labor camps. </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->These actions were to take place in the name of saving the British race from inevitable decline as its inferior members bred.<br><br>History has forgiven Churchill for his role in the Allied invasion of the Soviet Union in 1917. England's Minister for War and Air during the time, Churchill described the mission as seeking to "strangle at its birth" the Bolshevik state. In 1929, he wrote: "Were [the Allies] at war with Soviet Russia? Certainly not; but they shot Soviet Russians at sight. They stood as invaders on Russian soil. They armed the enemies of the Soviet Government. They blockaded its ports, and sunk its battleships. They earnestly desired and schemed its downfall."<br><br>Two years later, Churchill was secretary of state at the war office when the Royal Air Force asked him for permission <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>to use chemical weapons against "recalcitrant Arabs" <!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">as an experiment.</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Winston promptly consented (Yes, Churchill's gassing of Kurds pre-dated Hussein's by nearly 70 years).<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"I am strongly in favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes,"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> he explained, a policy he espoused yet again in July 1944 when he asked his chiefs of staff to consider using poison gas on the Germans <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"or any other method of warfare we have hitherto refrained from using."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Unlike in 1919, his proposal was denied...not that history would not have forgiven him anyway.<br><br>In language later appropriated by the Israelis, Winston Churchill had this to say about the Palestinians in 1937: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>When not scheming a Bolshevik downfall, gassing the uncivilized, or comparing Palestinians to dogs, Churchill found time to write soulmate Benito Mussolini. In January 1927, Sir Winston gushed to Il Duce, "<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>if I had been an Italian, I am sure I would have been entirely with you</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> from the beginning to the end of your victorious struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism." Even after the advent of WWII, Churchill found room in his heart for the Italian dictator, explaining to Parliament in 1940:"<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>I do not deny that he is a very great man</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> but he became a criminal when he attacked England."<br><br>Mussolini's criminality aside, Churchill certainly took note of Axis tactics...cavalierly observing that "everyone" was <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>bombing civilians. "It's simply a question of fashion,"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> he explained, "similar to that of whether short or long dresses are in."<br><br>Sir Winston must have been a slave to fashion because he soon ordered a fire-bombing raid on Hamburg in July 1943 that killed at least 48,000 civilians, after which he enlisted the aid of British scientists <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>to cook up "a new kind of weather"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> for larger German city.<br><br>In his wartime memoirs, Winston Churchill forgave himself for the countless civilians slaughtered in Dresden. "We made a heavy raid in the latter month on Dresden," he wrote benignly, "then a centre of communication of Germany's Eastern Front."<br><br>Surely the Nazis were hiding WMD there, right?<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://iticwebarchives.ssrc.org/Z%20Mag/www.zmag.org/content/showarticle1103.html?SectionID=37&ItemID=3930">iticwebarchives.ssrc.org/Z%20Mag/www.zmag.org/content/showarticle1103.html?SectionID=37&ItemID=3930</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=jc@rigorousintuition>jc</A> at: 7/12/06 5:50 pm<br></i>
jc
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 6:16 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

And July 11, 1948: "al-Nakba", the Catastrophe

Postby Gouda » Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:36 am

Sept 11, 1922 and July 11, 1948. Some sure have a fondness for commemorating anniversaries. <br><br>***<br><br>I love those words from Churchill - though I am confused: why was he fighting the Nazis?! Strange world - hard to stay on top of it. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Palestinian Catastrophe, Then and Now<br>On the story we almost never hear about—the Palestinian one—and an anniversary few of us have ever considered<br><br>By Sandy Tolan<br>07/11/06 "Mother Jones"<br><br>Under the pretext of forcing the release of a single soldier "kidnapped by terrorists" (or, if you prefer, "captured by the resistance" ), Israel has done the following: seized members of a democratically elected government; bombed its interior ministry, the prime minister's offices, and a school; threatened another sovereign state (Syria) with a menacing overflight; dropped leaflets from the air, warning of harm to the civilian population if it does not "follow all orders of the IDF" (Israel Defense Forces); loosed nocturnal "sound bombs" under orders from the Israeli prime minister to "make sure no one sleeps at night in Gaza"; fired missiles into residential areas, killing children; and demolished a power station that was the sole generator of electricity and running water for hundreds of thousands of Gazans.<br><br>Besieged Palestinian families, trapped in a locked-up Gaza, are in many cases down to one meal a day, eaten in candlelight. Yet their desperate conditions go largely ignored by a world accustomed to extreme Israeli measures in the name of security: nearly 10,000 Palestinians locked in Israeli jails, many without charge; 4,000 Gaza and West Bank homes demolished since 2000 and hundreds of acres of olive groves plowed under; three times as many civilians killed as in Israel, many due to "collateral damage" in operations involving the assassination of suspected militants.<br><br>"Wake up!" shouted the young Palestinian journalist Mohammed Omer from Gaza on San Francisco's "Arab Talk" radio in late June. "The Gaza people are starving. There is a real humanitarian crisis. Our children are born to live. Don't these people have any heart? No feelings at all? The world is silent!" ...<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>More echoes of Churchill, Nazi foe, on behalf of a Higher-grade Race, channelled by today's high priests of the occupation, some of whom fled the very same German Nazi sentiments:<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The latest attacks by Israel in Gaza, ostensibly on behalf of a single soldier, recall the comments by extremist Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, in his eulogy for American Jewish settler Baruch Goldstein, who in 1994 slaughtered 27 Palestinians praying in the Cave of the Patriarchs, part of the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"One million Arabs," Perrin declared, "are not worth a Jewish fingernail." </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13965.htm">www.informationclearingho...e13965.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=gouda@rigorousintuition>Gouda</A> at: 7/13/06 3:59 am<br></i>
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests