The latest debunking efforts

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The latest debunking efforts

Postby NewKid » Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:54 pm

all seem pretty lame (e.g., Manjoo, In These Times, Vanity Fair -- not even really a debunking, more like a missed opportunity -- tv reports on Barrett and Fetzer). Why aren't they citing the guy/firm from 9-11 myths all the time? Is Manjoo really so sloppy that he did a piece on 9-11 and Loose Change and didn't find the arguments in 9-11 myths? Why does he cite Hoffman instead, knowing Hoffman doesn't support his views? <br><br>Granted, all that these pieces really need to do is provide some plausible sounding rebuttal to hang your hat on for a few of the more exotic sounding conspiracy claims, and the reader who's looking to believe the official story can comfortably seize that and rest at ease. But given the level of 9-11 truth in the news recently, why aren't the debunkers trying harder to make their case? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=newkid@rigorousintuition>NewKid</A> at: 7/13/06 10:10 pm<br></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest debunking efforts

Postby NewKid » Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:36 pm

I've never understood this line of argument. Whatever you think of Loose Change, does anybody seriously think they're dishonoring the victims' memories or in it solely for the money?<br><br>And would it dishonor the victim's memory in a criminal case if show or attempt to show the defendant who's charged is not guilty and the guilty parties are still at large? <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/2006/07/ahem.html" target="top">loosechange911.blogspot.com/2006/07/ahem.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><br>The only conceivable argument I see here is "well, let the victims continue to believe it was only the 19 because they'll be caused more psychic trauma if they learned who really killed their relatives." But I think it's rather unlikely that's the argument anybody putting forward the "dishonoring the victims" silliness is making. <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest debunking efforts

Postby NewKid » Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:40 pm

If you can't win the game, smash the board!<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/rep-nass-cant-get-over-his-obsession.html" target="top">www.911blogger.com/2006/07/rep-nass-cant-get-over-his-obsession.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest