by * » Sat Sep 16, 2006 5:57 pm
<br>Here's <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/">Michael Rivero's</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> comment:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br> " Brasscheck TV is making all kinds of wounded sounds about my comment from yesterday regarding this photo. But facts are facts.<br><br> In the article I linked to yesterday, the photo is headlined as "A picture of the Pentagon you've never seen before". Clearly, that is not true since the photo in question has been at my website for many months.<br><br> Secondly, the photo Brasscheck TV offers has been severely cropped from the original and excludes a very obvious pile of aircraft debris, including seats and luggage, that has been pushed off to the left side.<br><br>As there is no smoke or smouldering, and as there has been enough time for some scaffolding to be inserted into the left edge of the hole to prevent further collapse, this photo was taken some time after the actual impact, after efforts to clear the debris and start repairs had already begun. So, it makes sense that actual debris from the impact point would have started to have been cleared away.<br><br>This "no plane" nonsense is a government disinfo plant. Every media attack on those who doubt the official 9-11 story inevitably uses this hoax to make the 9-11 truth movement look silly.<br><br>The claim that there was no plane at the Pentagon makes no sense. If the 9-11 perps have to get rid of the plane and passengers anyway, why not crash them into the Pentagon? Why add complexity to an already complex issue to save the plane and passengers when you have to get rid of them afterwards anyway?<br><br>Why would the 9-11 perps even bother with such a hoax to substitute some other aircraft for the passenger jet, then have to destroy the passenger jet and the passengers somewhere else, THEN get rid of that wreckage so it would never be found?<br><br>Finally, hundreds of witnesses saw the passenger jet flying towards the Pentagon. Not one person reported seeing it flying away, and with the WTC already destroyed everyone was very sensitive to nearby aircraft. People were looking very carefully at anything with wings. Hundreds saw the passenger jet head towards the Pentagon. None saw it fly away. What do the "Pod people" imagine, that Mr. Spock beamed the passenger jet up to the Enterprise at the last second?<br><br>The "no plane" theory does not make any sense. It never has. It exists solely to give the mainstream media an easy-to-use handle to ridicule those who doubt the official story."<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
