The National 9/11 Debate

[JD]

With millions of Americans now questioning the U.S. government’s official account of the events surrounding September 11, 2001, and with a growing number of professors, engineers, and former government officials, men and women that are uniquely qualified to challenge the government’s account of how World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 collapsed, as well as the government’s official account of the events at the Pentagon and United Flight 93, it is now time for the nation to witness a fearless and thorough debate on 9/11 that publicly answers the questions and concerns of a troubled and divided nation. It’s time for The National 9/11 Debate™.<br><br>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$<br><br>As of August 1, 2006, the 9/11 Commissioners, NIST scientists, and other key personnel responsible for the government’s non-sustainable account of what happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 all refuse to participate in the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC. <br><br>Consequently, the National 9/11 Debate date has been moved forward to March 10, 2007. <br><br>While the 9/11 Commissioners and NIST scientists remain invited to participate in the National 9/11 Debate, the Muckraker Report has expanded the potential government debate team members to any qualified people that are willing to publicly defend the government’s account of 9/11 against the civilian debate team already assembled.<br><br>Hey - this is good news - due to the "real" experts being unwilling to get slaugh..... oops step forward...... there is now a chance for "Believers" to do themselves, proud!! (Qutb and Nomo please take note!) <br><br>Volunteers can step forward by using the contact below:<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.teamliberty.net/id244.html" target="top">www.teamliberty.net/id244.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[orz]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>While the 9/11 Commissioners and NIST scientists remain invited to participate in the National 9/11 Debate, the Muckraker Report has expanded the potential government debate team members to any qualified people that are willing to publicly defend the government’s account of 9/11 against the civilian debate team already assembled.<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>To be cynical; they've failed to get anyone qualified to dignify the whole 9/11 'debate' quagmire so they're gonna have to open it up to any old idiot instead. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[darkbeforedawn]

They "debunkers" constantly talk about the "thousands" of engineers scientists etc. who participated in NIST yet not one is willing to step forward? Even the writiers of the infamous pancaking building event from MIT? Btw, I just noticed over at counterpunch that they have a new article by an engineer published in their subscribtion mag that will enlighten us all on how the WTC REALLY failed and why...oh boy. Can't wait to read this new claptrap <p></p><i></i>

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC.<br><br>Consequently, the National 9/11 Debate date has been moved forward to March 10, 2007. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Why move the date to AFTER the 11/04 elections? Bad move. <p></p><i></i>

[greencrow0]

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3249714675910247150">video.google.co.uk/videop...5910247150</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I don't know if this has already been posted....really explains well how the buildings collapsed.<br><br>gc <p></p><i></i>