Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War

by **dugoboy** » Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:57 pm

link:<a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/281006rockefellerpredicted.htm" target="top">Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11</a> Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11 ------------ Hollywood director Russo recalls remarkable "forecast" of coming attack Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 28 2006 Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo, currently receiving a wave of plaudits for his latest release, America: From Freedom to Fascism, told The Alex Jones Show that Nicholas Rockefeller had personally assured him there was going to be an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq eleven months before 9/11 took place. Saying he had been approached many times by the Rockefellers and other members of the CFR elite in an attempt to recruit him, Russo recalled a conversation that would come home to roost on September 11, 2001. "Here's what I do know first hand - I know that about eleven months to a year before 9/11 ever happened I was talking to my Rockefeller friend (Nicholas Rockefeller) and he said to me 'Aaron there's gonna be an event' and he never told me what the event was going to be - I'm not sure he knew what the event was going to be I don't know that he knew that," said Russo. Russo related how Rockefeller knew precisely what the event would lead to and which countries would be militarily targeted by the elite. "He just said there's gonna be an event and out of that event we're gonna invade Afghanistan so we can run pipelines through the Caspian sea, we can go into Iraq to take the oil and establish bases in the middle east and to make the middle east part of the new world order and we're going to go after Venezuela - that's what's going to come out of this event." "Eleven months to a year later that's what happened....he certainly knew that something was going to happen." "In my relationships with some of these people I can tell you that it's as evil as it really gets - this is it - this is the game," stated Russo - also relating how members of the elite were routinely obsessed by creating a world identification society where people had to carry ID cards and prove who they were at all times. Rockefeller also told Russo that the elite families created and financed the women's lib movement so they could tax another half of the population and so that the children would be trained by them in government schools rather than in the context of the family unit. Russo also sounded off on 9/11, openly airing his view for the first time that it was a complete inside job. "People know that 9/11 was an inside job," said Russo, "look what they did here in America, look at 9/11, look what they did - they killed thousands of Americans - people jumping out of windows from a hundred floors up - they don't care," said the director. "There's no way that Building 7 came down without a controlled demolition, it takes weeks to do the controlled demolition, they couldn't have done it in a few hours like Larry Silverstein said - it blows the whole game - concrete doesn't turn to powder unless its exploded." "We all know that 9/11 was a fraud - an inside job," concluded Russo. ___________________________________________ "Fascism finds root best in unreality, dysfunction and irresponsibility." - Me "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" -George Orwell "When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it - always." -Mahatma GandhiEdited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> <IMG HEIGHT=10 WIDTH=10 SRC="http://www.geocities.com/orcthrasher/files/images/Qn38113.gif" BORDER=0> at: 10/29/06 1:58 pm

by **maggrwaggr** » Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:53 pm

Unfortunately he has no way to prove this. I mean, it's easy to say something like this after the fact. To me, one of the biggest smoking guns is that they had to have written The Patriot Act before 9/11. It's almost impossible to have simply TYPED that fucking document in the time between 9/11 and when it hit Congress. And how many legal documents do you know of that can be written that quickly? If you've ever dealt with lawyers writing lawyer-ese, it doesn't happen quickly AT ALL. Somebody spent a great deal of time on the Patriot Act before 9/11 ever happened.

by **Dreams End** » Sun Oct 29, 2006 7:16 pm

Much of the Patriot Act was actually developed under Clinton. It has large parts of the Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty act or whatever it was called. It's not just the neocons. Why did Russo wait till now to reveal his insider info?

by **Avalon** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:48 am

So why the hell would the CFR want to recruit Russo? Because he ran in the Nebraska Republican primary for governor in 1998? Somehow that does not fit my idea of the career path for making your way up the ladder to join forces with the Permanent Government. Or because he was the first person to book Led Zeppelin in the US, and they thought they might be able to eventually reel in Jimmy Page to supply the Crowley connections to further consolidate their evil plans for world domination? (Note: yes, I truly understand that CFR undoubtedly do have evil plans for world domination. I just don't understand where Russo fits in.) Nicholas Rockefeller on "women's lib": I was friendly with one of the Rockefellers. He said to me one day “Aaron, remember that whole thing with women’s lib, when it was the biggest thing, you saw it in all magazines and on television, ‘Women’s lib! Women have a right to work just as they have a right to vote, and you make sure that they have a right to work.’ We, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Federal Reserve, were promoting that whole thing! Because we wanted to get the women into the work force, we wanted to be able to tax them! That’s why you saw it in all the newspapers all the time. The added plus was: then they had to put their children in child care and to school early. So we could control their minds at a young age. That’s what that was all about. You called it women’s lib, but it was about giving us control. And nobody realized that.” <a href="http://ourworldinbalance.blogspot.com/2006/07/story-of-aaron-russo.html">ourworldinbalance.blogspo...russo.html</a> CFR got feminism into magazines and newspapers? Who'd a thunk it? <slaps forehead> I got duped by the CFR! I'd better go up in the attic and find those copies of off our backs from the 1970s that are in a box somewhere, and burn them. How was I to know those hussies were puppets of the CFR?

by **sln70** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:58 am

absolutely ridiculous. I suppose they also freed the slaves.

by **4911** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:47 pm

William M. Cooper talked about that "event" all the way back in 88. Check out book called "Behold a Pale Horse" In fact he knew exactly that it was supposed to usher in the Gnu World Order. Only thing was he wasnt sure whether it would involve terrorists or human-engineered "aliens". But he knew NY, he knew WTC and he knew it would come from the sky. He was then summarily blown away by a small-town sherriff about a month after the attacks. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 10/30/06 9:53 am

by **erosoplier** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:48 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>So why the hell would the CFR want to recruit Russo?<hr></blockquote> Well, he is currently getting together a nice little anti-fascist list over at his anti-fascist <a href="http://www.freedomtofascism.com/" target="top">website</a>, for one. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"> Why begin the Great Work by compiling a list of names of plebs? Why spend half your film looking (with bleary republican eyes) at a problem (ie tax) that can be fixed in a jiffy with a few strokes of a few pens? I'll be more than pleased to see him prove himself over the long run, but at the moment he looks a little bit like some kind of front-runner. And re. feminism, oddly enough, I believe him about that one - that it was hijacked by corporate interests. Maybe I've spent too much time, bemused, reading The Way It Is according to Henry Makow at <a href="http://www.savethemales.ca/" target="top">savethemales</a>? (And a disclaimer and warning: I can cop about 30%, maybe 40% of what Henry reckons, and if your like me, it's very difficult work figuring out which 30 or 40% it is that you can cop).

by **Dreams End** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:03 pm

I don't know anything about Russo, but that whole thing sounds fake. "Remember when that women's lib was a big thing?" Whatever. However, I do buy that Gloria Steinem had CIA connections...as is often the case with stuff like this, there's some element of truth. I doubt Russo is being recruited by anyone, though...if nothing else because he keeps publicizing their big "secrets." What's up with Nebraska, though? Back to Steinem..I think that in general, activists who received CIA funding were chosen in hopes of keeping them anti-Soviet and anti-Communist, so it's not a matter of saying everything someone who got sponsored by CIA was automatically bad. Here's some info on Steinem and CIA: <a href="http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/steinem.html">world youth festival</a> <a href="http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/festival.html">Steinem's report</a> Here's a longer piece, a transcription of a Dave Emory show. It's important to note that the "outing" of Steinem was done by a feminist collective called "Red Stockings Collective." So, though the spin by some such as Makow has been that this shows all of feminism was created by the CIA, that is not what this shows. What it shows is that Steinem was part of that effort, via CIA fronts like the Congress for Cultural Freedom, to infiltrate and shape activist groups. I think the basic idea is that if groups were anti-socialist, they were not bothered. Steinem was definitely promoted, though, not just used to infiltrate. There was big money behind Ms. Magazine and links to the CIA Washington Post. And I keep reading she dated Kissinger? (oooooow...that's gross or does it suggest we are now getting into some MC elements here? ) <a href="http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/8425/ST-CIA.HTM">link</a> It also may be interesting to note that the first and really only sympathetic article I remember reading about SRA was in Ms. Magazine. anyway, slightly OT, but this is a good example of what happens a lot. 1. CIA and the like do something underhanded. 2. Usually the purpose is to steer movements into acceptable channels...anti-revolutionary...anti-socialist. 3. Some part of the story gets out. 4. The part that does get out is picked up by rightwing whackos and/or disinfo artists and spun in ways that make the whole thing look ridiculous. So we have the idea that Steinem was working within feminism and other social movements to report on them and then, regarding feminism, to channel it into more moderate directions get turned into the idea that the CIA (or CFR or whatever) created all of feminism. Thus, no feminist of any sort is likely to pay much attention though when these accusations were published by the VIllage Voice (Red Stocking Collective was kept from publishing with threatened lawsuits) it was taken seriously. There was a time, believe it or not, when the left found an activists CIA connections to be problematic. Sadly, I'm using my entire blog to argue that the left should avoid working with the CIA. Times have changed.

by **sunny** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:37 pm

It has always annoyed me that organizations such as NOW are primarily concerned with making the lives of affluent women more comfortable, ie abortion rights. Look, poor women cannot afford abortions. When accidental pregnancies occur, they face the music and have their children. What they need is free contraceptives, first of all, and then economic empowerment, such as agressive enforcement of child support, access to food stamps and child care (you practically have to be starving to get into the "Grandma Program", which subsidizes day-care;even then, it's a minimum 1 year wait) at higher income levels, raising the minimum wage, and a host of other programs. Why do wealthy national orgs such as NOW not concern themselves with less fortunate women and their concerns? Why do they not get involved with labor issues, or issues concerning civil rights in general? (NOW has endorsed Lieberman, FYI) I don't know if they are CIA fronts or not, but they sure couldn't be more useful to them if they were.

by **maggrwaggr** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:12 am

Very interesting, sunny. You bring up a lot of great points. I really don't know much about NOW, but I would hazard a guess that if you "followed the money" it suddenly would all make sense. There's not much money in providing free contraception to the poor, you know.

by **NavnDansk** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:36 am

unusual to have a Hollywood craftsperson admit to attempt to suborn them: <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Saying he had been approached many times by the Rockefellers and other members of the CFR elite in an attempt to recruit him, Russo recalled a conversation that would come home to roost on September 11, 2001.<hr></blockquote> A while back I read of a young attorney who said Kerry tried to get him involved in the outer circle membership of skull and bones but he refused. I think it was in an interview with a woman who wrote a book on the oddity of two skull and bones members competing directly for the 2004 presidential "election". Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=navndansk>NavnDansk</A> at: 10/31/06 12:37 am

by **Pissed Off Cabbie** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:40 pm

Isn't it interesting to note that an obscure attorney is a member of the CFR. I wish my name was Rockefeller. I'd like to know Nicholas' relationship to the family. Which of the five brothers is his father? Those bastards keep multiplying to where there could be one in every state, running the game.

by **dugoboy** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:04 pm

i've just spent an hour and half trying to find out how he is related and i cannot find one link with complete information. he is either kept incredibly hidden, or not related to the central branch of the family. i've looked up every child or sibling in the most recent generations and nicholas is no where to be found. i can't find birthdates or status of marriage or if he has any children. these are the only two meaningful things i could find: a very brief wikipedia entry: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_rockefeller">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nic...ockefeller</a> (this entry was made, if you look at the history tab, october 29th a day after the story 'broke' on prisonplanet.com AND the only link that is given is to alex jones infowars site about the aaron russo story) and contact information for him at a website called Center for International Legal Studies: <a href="http://cils.net/conferences/addresso.php?NameID=1808&ConferenceID=108&">cils.net/conferences/addr...nceID=108&</a> <a href="http://cils.net/" target="top">Center for International Legal Studies</a> is "is a non-profit research, training, and law publications institute, established and operating under Austrian law. Its international headquarters are in Salzburg, Austria. The Center has operated from there since 1976. The Center for International Legal Studies cooperates internationally with numerous institutions of higher legal education, lawyers' professional associations and international organisations such as UNCITRAL, the ITU, and WIPO. The essential purpose of the Center for International Legal Studies is the promotion of the dissemination of information among members of the international legal community. This is achieved through legal research and publication projects, the administration of post-graduate and professional training programs, and the operation of continuing legal education conferences each year. More than 4,500 lawyers worldwide have been designated as Fellows of the Center for International Legal Studies in recognition of their contributions to the Center's publications and conferences. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_International_Legal_Studies he is a member of CFR. that's all i can find. ___________________________________________ "Fascism finds root best in unreality, dysfunction and irresponsibility." - Me "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" -George Orwell "When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it - always." -Mahatma GandhiEdited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> <IMG HEIGHT=10 WIDTH=10 SRC="http://www.geocities.com/orcthrasher/files/images/Qn38113.gif" BORDER=0> at: 10/31/06 3:12 pm

by **Pissed Off Cabbie** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:06 am

Wikipedia has a Rockefeller family chart, but no Nicholas. Perhaps their research missed him, or a Rocky changed his 1st name. That fact that he's on the CFR is significant enough that he must be part of the immediate family. Meanwhile, I learned who the next heir is: "Also in 1983, he headed a planning committee to draft a new strategy for the family's main philanthropic vehicle, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, set up in 1940. Their report recommended a one world perspective, focusing on issues of resources and global security, including arms control, international relations, economic development, trade and finance. Because of this effort, and close administrative involvement with the family office, Room 5600, it has been said he will take over leadership of the family upon his father's death." This is David Jr, who is now the one to watch. 'One world perspective' says it all.

by **Vigilant Guardian** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:00 pm

Highly suspicious to say the least. Sounds like Russo trying to simply prove his point. Please join us mr. movie-maker guy. You are soooo Illuminati New World Order material. Please, we'll tell you all our secrets...

Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War

Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War

Re: Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War

Re: Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War

If there's a bustle in your hedgerow

that rubs me the wrong way, too

Re: that rubs me the wrong way, too

Re: If there's a bustle in your hedgerow

Re: that rubs me the wrong way, too

Re: that rubs me the wrong way, too

Re: that rubs me the wrong way, too

Re: unusual to have a Hollywood craftsperson admit

Rocky Road

Re: Rocky Road

Rocky Mystery

suspicious

Who is online