Police chief claims Lockerbie evidence was faked

by **starroute** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:55 pm

<a href="http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1855852005">news.scotsman.com/index.c...1855852005</a> A FORMER Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated. The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people. The police chief, whose identity has not yet been revealed, gave the statement to lawyers representing Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, currently serving a life sentence in Greenock Prison. The evidence will form a crucial part of Megrahi's attempt to have a retrial ordered by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC). The claims pose a potentially devastating threat to the reputation of the entire Scottish legal system. The officer, who was a member of the Association of Chief Police Officers Scotland, is supporting earlier claims by a former CIA agent that his bosses "wrote the script" to incriminate Libya.

by **heyjt** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:24 pm

Here is the scuttle-but about Lockerbie, I'm sure many of you know. A military intel team lead by Major Charles Mackie was returning to the US with evidence of Oliver Norths Iran-Contra drug trafficking network. I had lengthy phone conversations with Dr. Fuisz, listed below. He also blew the lid on the story that the Terex Corporation was building rocket-launching trucks under CIA contract for the Iraqi military. I wrote an article about Fuisz and Terex, but didn't know at the time he had been CIA. How nia've. I have no idea what is happening to the Lindauer case, she was apparantly set up as a foreign agent and jailed under anti-terrorism laws. Here's an article about Fuisz and Lockerbie: SUNDAY HERALD, SCOTLAND, MAY 28, 2000 - A former CIA agent who claims Libya is not responsible for the Lockerbie bombing is being gagged by the US government under state secrecy laws and faces 10 years in prison if he reveals any information about the terrorist attack. United Nations diplomats are outraged that the US government is apparently suppressing a potential key trial witness. Diplomats are now demanding that the CIA agent, Dr Richard Fuisz, be released from the gagging order. Fuisz, a multi-millionaire businessman and pharmaceutical researcher, was, according to US intelligence sources, the CIA's key operative in the Syrian capital Damascus during the 1980s where he also had business interests. One month before a court order was served on him by the US government gagging him from speaking on the grounds of national security, he spoke to US congressional aide Susan Lindauer, telling her he knew the identities of the Lockerbie bombers and claiming they were not Libyan. Lindauer, shocked by Fuisz's claims, immediately compiled notes on the meeting which formed the basis of a later sworn affidavit detailing Fuisz's claims. One month after their conversation, in October 1994, a court in Washington DC issued an order barring him from revealing any information on the grounds of "military and state secrets privilege". When contacted by the Sunday Herald last night, Fuisz said when asked if he was a CIA agent in Syria in the 1980s: "That is not an issue I can confirm or deny. I am not allowed to speak about these issues. In fact, I can't even explain to you why I can't speak about these issues." Fuisz did, however, say that he would not take any action against a newspaper which named him as a CIA agent. Congressional aide Lindauer, who was involved in early negotiations over the Lockerbie trial, claims Fuisz made "unequivocal statements to me that he has first-hand knowledge about the Lockerbie case". In her affidavit, she goes on: "Dr Fuisz has told me that he can identify who orchestrated and executed the bombing. Dr Fuisz has said that he can confirm absolutely that no Libyan national was involved in planning or executing the bombing of Pan Am 103, either in any technical or advisory capacity whatsoever." Fuisz's statements to Lindauer support the claims of the two Libyan accused who are to incriminate a number of terrorist organizations, including the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, which had strong links to Syria and Iran. Lindauer said Fuisz told her he could provide information on Middle Eastern terrorists, and referred to Lockerbie as an “example of an unsolved bombing case that he said he has the immediate capability to resolve”. Lindauer says Fuisz told her CIA staff had destroyed reports he sent them on Lockerbie. Lindauer also refers in her affidavit to speculation that the USA shifted any connection to Lockerbie away from Syria to Libya in return for its support during the Gulf war. She added that Fuisz told her: “If the [US] government would let me, I could identify the men behind this attack today. I could do the right thing … I could go into any crowded restaurant and pick out these men … I can tell you their home addresses … You won’t find [them] anywhere in Libya. You will only find [them] in Damascus. I was investigating on the ground and I know.” The 1994 gagging order was issued following disclosures by Fuisz during other legal proceedings about alleged illegal exports of military equipment to Iraq. The order claims that the information held by Fuisz is vital to the “nation’s security or diplomatic relations” and can not be revealed “no matter how compelling the need for, and relevance of, the information”. The submission also makes clear that the government is empowered to “protect its interests in this case in the future”, thereby gagging Fuisz permanently. Details of Fuisz’s gagging have been passed to the United Nations, including UN secretary general Kofi Annan, Russia’s UN ambassador Sergey Lavrov and the Libyan UN ambassador, as well as representatives of France and China. The report on the Fuisz gagging, containing Lindauer’s affidavit, refers to “the history of US interference … [and] … sabotage by the United States”. ~~~ The Sunday Herald will make the Lindauer affidavit and Fuisz gagging order available to both the Crown and defense if they require the documents. -- And if this works, here's the Lindauer story: Susan Lindauer Case aka Symbol SUSAN Arrested Thursday, 11 March 2004 Charged with conspiracy, acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government and taking money from a government that supports terrorism Acted as an unregistered agent of the Mukhabarat (Iraqi Intelligence Service IIS) Had prohibited dealings with several members of the IIS in visits to the Iraqi Mission to the United Nations in New York Conspired with Iraqi government agents Raed Rokan Al-Anbuke and Wisam Noman Al-Anbuke, sons of Iraq's former liaison with United Nations weapons inspectors Early 2002: Traveled to Baghdad to meet with IIS officers and received about $10,000 for her services Alleged acceptance of the money and her willingness to bring it home from Iraq violated a law prohibiting transactions with a government that sponsors international terrorism June and July 2003: Met on two occasions in Baltimore with an undercover FBI agent who was posing as a representative of the Libyan intelligence service and was seeking to support resistance groups fighting U.S. forces in post-war Iraq Filled two deaddrops in Takoma Park, MD Background Information: 41 years old Lives on Manor Circle in Takoma Park, MD Employment: Congressional Aide: 11 March to 14 May 2002: press secretary for Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) Statement of Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren on Ms. Susan Lindauer, 11 March 2004 Fox News 1998: Executive producer for political affairs at Channel 28 in Washington, DC 1996: press secretary for former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (D-Ill.), who recently ran as a 2004 Democratic Presidential candidate 1994: press secretary for former Rep. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), before he became a senator 1993: press secretary for Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) Reporter: Sept 1990-August 1991: Part-time, temporary reporter associate at U.S. News & World Report 3 August 1987-25 July 1989: Editorial writer for Everett Herald newspaper 27 April-17 July 1987: temporary, full-time reporter on the metro desk of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper 1986: Fortune magazine Grew up in Anchorage, Alaska 1981 graduate of East High School, AK 1985 graduate of Smith College Masters degree in public policy from the London School of Economics Father is Dr. John Lindauer, a former newspaper publisher, University of Alaska Chancellor (1976-7<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> , and 1998 Republican gubernatorial nominee in Alaska (lost and charged with campaign finance fraud--his $1.7M campaign money came from his wife, Dorothy) Johnny on the spot John Lindauer talked of a legacy. Instead, his run for governor is remembered as the most self-destructive campaign in Alaska's history.....(Juneau Empire, 8 Nov 199<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> Mother-Jackie (deceased in 1992); step-mother: Dorothy Oremus Lindauer, a wealthy Chicago attorney and cement heiress Brother: John Lindauer Distant cousin: White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:46 pm

David Guyatt has a <a href="http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/lockerbie-the_syrian_connection.htm" target="top">particularly lucid</a> essay on Lockerbie, and "the narcotics trafficking, gun-running and money-laundering cover-up of Pan Am flight 103": Within hours of Pan Am 103 exploding over the small Scottish village, CIA agents were swarming over the wreckage. Clearly they were looking for something extraordinary. Aboard the downed plane was a secret, five-man Defence Intelligence Agency “team” headed by Major Charles “Tiny” McKee. A suitcase belonging to McKee was recovered and emptied before being returned to the site to be “found” again. Inside had been a large quantity of Heroin, some “sensitive” documents, plus a large quantity of cash and travellers cheques. These items were “purged” from official records. Incredibly, an unidentified body was also removed from the crash site. No official explanation has been given for these extraordinary examples of evidence tampering. The DIA team had been in Lebanon searching for US hostages held by Hezbollah. Whilst in Lebanon, McKee’s team is said to have come across a secret CIA operation known as “CIA One,” who were collaborating with Manzur El-Khassar, a Syrian drug dealer. El-Khassar was closely aligned to Lt. Col. Oliver North’s highly illegal activities around the world. These included covert trafficking of narcotics and weapons. The Syrian was also involved in brokering weapons to Iran in exchange for hostages. El-Khassar’s precise role in the Lockerbie bombing may be the missing link that unravels the entire story. ... Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley is a fertile area ideally suited to growing Opium. Rifat Assad, the brother of Syria’s President Hafez Assad is widely known to have been in charge of Syria’s narcotics enterprise, and was the “Supremo” of the Bekaa Valley’s massive Opium industry. Rifat, a CIA “asset,” was being groomed to succeed his elder brother to become the Syrian President. He was extremely close to El-Khassar. The influx of 30,000 Syrian troops to Lebanon in the late eighties, had as much to do with protecting the Opium fields, as with separating the warring factions. El-Khassar, in exchange for his help to release US hostages held in Lebanon, and, presumably, for past favours to the Contra’s, was permitted to ship Heroin to the US. The US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) maintain that his pipeline, through Frankfurt airport, was a carefully controlled “sting” operation. Others, more cynical doubt this explanation. Dark rumours persist that Major “Tiny” McKee had unearthed the illegal dope connection and realised that elements within the CIA were actively collaborating in it. Deciding to report the matter to his superiors, McKee booked his team on a flight home aboard the ill fated Pan Am 103. Their travel plans were intercepted and reported to Syrian intelligence, who notified El-Khassar. He, in turn, arranged to have a bomb planted inside the suitcase used to carry the regular Heroin shipment - to dispose of McKee and his evidence. The Lebanese connection reminds me of the coincident <a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/04/dead-man-dead-man-when-will-you-arise.html" target="top">Operation Nimbus</a>, which the FBI's Deborah Novinger claimed unintentionally revealled Bush family links to the Lebanese narcotics trade. Anyone read Lester Coleman's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/074751562X/qid=1125276332/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-7010694-7059004?v=glance&s=books" target="top">Trail of the Octopus</a>?

by **Anonymous** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:45 pm

From <a href="http://truthnews.com/world/2003090025.htm">truthnews.com/world/2003090025.htm</a> "Let’s not be fooled by apparent transparent efforts to show both good deeds and "good faith" that mask ongoing efforts and funding of fanatics by Moammar Khadafi and Libya. Libyan ruler and strongman Moammar Khadafi, in a move to gain acceptance of his country among the international community of nations, agreed to pay $2.7 billion to the families of the 270 victims in the1988 bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The move was seen as a dramatic step forward for a man known to have sponsored a wave of bloody international terror through the 1970’s and 1980’s. It even prompted discussions about whether Libya should be removed from Washington’s list of state sponsors of terror and whether U.N. imposed sanctions -- in place for 11 years -- should be lifted." The recent developments in this case, as noted above, raises the questions: Was Khadafi paid off to assume the blame and make pay-offs to the families, and if so, by whom?

by **heyjt** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:59 pm

And was Susan Lindauer set up as a foreign agent and made to look semi-crazy because she went to Congress with the story that Fuisz couldn't tell --because of his gag order?? The easing of sanctions on Lybia coincided almost exactly with Lindauers arrest, she being a proponent of Fuisz's "Syrians did it" information... P.S. JEFF- The "Happy face" came up automaticly on my previous post, on the number 9, and I don't know why--heyjt

by **heyjt** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:46 am

From of all places, "The National Review". It sure looks like a set-up... and Andrew Card is listed as being her cousin in a previous post. March 22, 2004, 9:10 a.m. Armchair Diplomat, Back-Channel Baathist Duped by the enemy. By Clinton W. Taylor Was what Susan Lindauer is accused of doing really all that bad? Lindauer's alleged crime was contacting President George W. Bush's chief of staff, Andrew Card, (at the behest of Iraqi intelligence agents) with an offer to mediate between the White House and Saddam. Her remarks last week, after she entered a plea of not guilty, suggest she is unrepentant and casts herself in the role of a spurned peacemaker. "I am incredibly proud of my work," she insisted, blaming Bush's obstinance for her arrest. She also claimed to have persuaded the Iraqi regime to allow an FBI agent to fly to Baghdad in order to ascertain the truth about a Prague meeting between September 11 hijacker Mohammed Atta and an Iraqi agent. Claimed Lindauer, "President Bush refused to send the FBI, and here I am today." Her attorneys will probably portray Lindauer as a concerned amateur diplomat along the lines of ABC correspondent John Scali, who met with KGB resident Aleksandr Feliksov during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Scali, acting on instructions from the White House, exerted pressure on the Soviets to convince them an American invasion of Cuba was imminent. Perhaps "Symbol Susan" (as she was allegedly known by Iraqi officials) something of a journalist herself, saw an opportunity to become the Iraq war's Scali. Was that so wrong? The problem, according to Cambridge intelligence historian Christopher Andrew, is that the Scali exchange marked "the first time the initiative in the back channel had passed from East to West." In The Lord of the Rings, good kings and wizards are deceived by crystal balls (palantiri) that they believe grant them a true vision of the world, but in fact allow them to see only what Sauron intends them to see. The sad but true history of back-channel diplomacy is a similar tale — one of enemy intelligence agencies showing gullible American presidents only what they want them to see. The Cuban Missile Crisis was exacerbated by Bobby Kennedy's own back channel to the Soviets, a friendly KGB officer named Bolshakov. Bobby met with Bolshakov regularly; viewing the meetings as a means of circumventing the unwieldy diplomatic process of negotiating directly with Krushchev. Bolshakov, in turn, used the channel to deceive the Kennedy brothers and to circumvent the unwelcome caution of their advisers. Among his deceptions was reassuring Kennedy that Krushchev had no intention of placing missiles in Cuba — until the missiles were in place. Another dupe of Communist back channels was FDR's personal assistant, Harry Hopkins. The clueless Hopkins secretly corresponded with a Soviet spymaster named Ishkak Abdulovich Akhmerov because he thought he was a direct link to Stalin. Akhmerov called Hopkins an "agent of major significance," albeit an "unconscious" one. (Some doubt still lingers about how "unwitting" Hopkins really was.) In assessing the damage Lindauer might have done it is worth considering another prewar incident from Roosevelt's administration. Roosevelt's friend, E. Stanley Jones, a well-known Methodist preacher, offered to carry messages back and forth between Roosevelt and a Japanese diplomat, Hidenari Terasaki. Terasaki implored Roosevelt to appeal for peace directly to the emperor. He also begged Roosevelt not to mention his name owing to the risks Terasaki ran by his secret peacemaking correspondence. Roosevelt assured Jones that Terasaki's secret was safe, and the next day he discussed with his Cabinet the idea of an appeal to the emperor. The telegram was never sent, but Roosevelt took the message to mean the Japanese were disorganized and "running around like wet hens." That was on December 2, 1941. If Terasaki was trying to sow complacency and doubt about Japanese intentions while preparations for Pearl Harbor were underway, then he succeeded. And as chief of Japanese Intelligence for the Western Hemisphere, that is exactly what he was trying to do. Roosevelt — and his staff — lost valuable time worrying about Terasaki's disinformation. Without that distraction, someone may have had time to piece together the ample information America had gathered about the impending attack. What happened to these dupes of foreign agents? Nothing much. Stanley Jones continued a successful career as a respected worldwide evangelist. Harry Hopkins was remembered fondly as "one of the 20th century's best government figures" by Wall Street Journal columnist Al Hunt, even after the news of his collaboration broke. Thanks to the FBI's follow-up sting, Susan Lindauer's legacy is bound to be less illustrious. In light of her latter conduct, her "peace overtures" begin to look more like bait for an Iraqi intelligence trap. According to her indictment, she flew to Iraq, met Iraqi Intelligence agents in the Al-Rashid hotel, and accepted $5,000 cash from them. But just to nail her coffin shut an undercover FBI agent approached her (claiming to be a Libyan intelligence agent) and discussed the necessity of supporting the Iraqi "resistance." In accordance with the agent's instructions, the indictment charges, Lindauer twice left dead drops around Takoma Park, Maryland, where she lived. It has not yet emerged what was in the dead drops, but the indictment alleges that she executed one of them "on or about August 6, 2003." That was one day after a "resistance group" which Lindauer supported killed an American civilian mailman in Tikrit. Her second alleged dead drop occurred "on or about August 21, 2003," two days after these "resistance groups" killed U.N. envoy Sergio Vieira de Mello and 21 others with a horrific truck bomb at U.N. headquarters in Baghdad. How could Lindauer not have known the malignant character of the terrorists that continue to murder Coalition forces and pro-democracy Iraqis every day? The rubble, after all, was still smoking when Lindauer made her drop. If Symbol Susan knew the score, so did the White House. They avoided a temptation that has often tripped up more "nuanced" administrations: that of direct, private contact with the enemy. They probably realized that back channels the enemy tries to open are usually pipelines for disinformation. They definitely realized Saddam was utterly untrustworthy, and therefore never wavered in their efforts to topple him. — Clinton W. Taylor is a lawyer and a graduate student in political science at Stanford. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/taylor200403220910.asp">www.nationalreview.com/co...220910.asp</a>

by **emad** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:06 am

new evidence had surfaced regarding the Lockerbie bombing. A baggage handler at Heathrow Airport in charge of a cargo depot for the Lockerbie Pan Am flight had made an eventually corroborated statement to the police that the depot had been broken into and its contents tampered with. The BBC story then went on to say that the Metropolitan Police investigation into this aspect of the bombing was then rapidly taken over by MI5/Special Branch under the direct control of up and coming MI5 starlet Stella Rimington, subsequently MI5 head under the John Major administration. The BBC story continued to say that this aspect of the Lockerbie investigation was then suddenly dropped on the direct orders of Margaret Thatcher following a panic meeting with the UK's Joint Chiefs of Staff who oversee all military intelligence matters. The BBC's story was then mothballed when the 9/11 hijackers struck the WTC..... Previously, the UK's Defence Intelligence Monitor ran a story in March 1990 saying that a UK Parliamentary Defence Intelligence Select Committee had heard information in late 1989/early 1990 that stated that Robert Maxwell had alleged the evidence trail pointing to a Libyan bombing connection in the Pan Am Lockerbie bombing had come initially from Saudi Arabia. The DIM story said that the Saudis' top spook Kamel Adham [former BCCI director/shareholder and Saudi-joint-venture business partner of Tory MP Jonathan Aitken - subsequently Minister for Defence Procurement and convicted perjurer who served a custodial sentence when caught out lying in a defamation lawsuit against the Guardian newspaper -] was being leaned on by George Bush Sr who as VP to Ronald Reagan was in hot water after the US bombing of Tripoli where Muammar Ghaddafi's daughter was killed. Adham was under pressure from Libyan-financed Wahhabist reactionaries in the Saudi royal court who were threatening a military coup d'etat after the CIA allegedly assasinated the real King Fahd Bin Abdel Aziz Al Saud and replaced him with a lookalike plant willing to negotiate in an arms-for-oil deal. The financing was sourced as emanating via Manama-based Arab Banking Corporation (ABC) an Arab mega bank owned by the government of Libya - via the Libyan Secretariat of Treasury , Kuwait Ministry of Finance and the government of Abu Dhabi, which was also principal shareholder in BCCI. The alleged Fahd assasination followed a bizarre scam involving the Soviets allegedly arming Fahd-controlled Saudi military with a number of atomic weapons and the intervention of the UK's SAS and US Marines to de-activate and confiscate those atomic weapons in a successful covert operation. The DIM feature on this said some credibility to this story had to be given because a number of elite, specialist UK and US military personnel were subsequently awarded 'the highest UK military honors' - the Victoria Cross - in a classified military ceremony videotaped at Buckingham Palace. Some credibility to Maxwell's statements to the Parliamentary Secelect Committee was also accredited to the fact that he, former CIA spook Richard McGarrach Helms and James R Bath were all director/shareholders of BCCI's ulitmate parent company International Credit & Investment Corporation - ICIC - registered in the Carribean. The DIM story then said that Robert Maxwell was part of a huge disinformation loop that UK cops were running to bust him for spying for Israel. See the Dillon/Thomas book 'Robert Maxwell was a Mossad Spy' reviewed here: <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12419168&method=full&siteid=50143">www.mirror.co.uk/news/all...teid=50143</a> And that he owed Aitken a six figure sum in a blackmail scenario where Aitken was trying to take over some of his publishing business assets in the Middle East. Maxwell died in November 1991 in a 'mysterious midnight swimming accident' from his boat moored near the Canary Islands. On 23 September 2004 the UK Public records Office published a statement that said Tory cabinet minister Malcolm Rifkind had blocked any official inestigation into Maxwell's death. So any credible strains of whatever Maxwell had told the Parliamentary Select Committee on Defence Intelligence were also efficiently mothballed........................................ This weekend's latest twist on the Lockerbie bombing may be the start of some pretty unpalatable cold war secrets of the Thatcher/Reagan/Bush1 triumvirate finally eeking out. When Robert Maxwell died in November 1991 there was a major rubbish-clearance internal operation at Mossad with many old timers being chucked out and their intelligence sources finally discredited. Their cold war files need to be opened. Maxwell was hardly the biggest operative they had. His son Kevin Maxwell has been top of many spooks' No 1 wish list for a long, long time. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=emad@rigorousintuition>emad</A> at: 8/29/05 9:52 am

by **Sweejak** » Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:10 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Sky Television – Conspiracies: Lockerbie & the CIA Mainstream documentary that looks at the various scenarios surrounding the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie in December 1988. Was a CIA heroin trafficking operation compromised, allowing a bomb to be placed on board?<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_miscellaneous.htm">www.thedossier.ukonline.c...aneous.htm</a>

by **emad** » Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:22 pm

Press vehemently suppresses Israeli involvement When Pan Am 103 exploded at Lockerbie, the media hyped up "Moslem Terrorists". First the Syrians, then the Iranians, and finally the Libyans. The most obvious suspect should have been the State of Israel, because it alone stood to gain from blackening the reputations of Arab nations. Despite an earlier known attempt to bomb one of its very own El Al airliners in 1986 for media effect, the probability that the Mossad was also responsible for bombing Pan Am Flight was ruthlessly suppressed. Israel claims they warn us Pan Am's Israeli investigator said a Mossad agent first tipped off U.S. and West German intelligence agents that a terrorist attack would be made on an American passenger plane departing from Frankfurt on or about Dec. 18. Iran was blamed initially Iran's alleged motive for carrying out the attack was assumed to be a desire for revenge for the shooting down of an Iranian civilian flight by the US warship, the Vincennes, killing all 290 passengers and crew aboard, on 3 July 1988. Mossad sends fake messages implicating Libya It will be alleged that Mossad sent a fake radio communication from Tripoli to Libyan agents in Berlin claiming 'mission accomplished' the day after the explosion Pan Am hires an Israeli to investigate Pan Am hires Yuval Aviv ( Former Mossad now US citizen ) to investigate. His conclusion was a Syrian named Ahmed Jibril blew up the jet. The CIA was working with a Syrian drug- and arms-dealer named Monzer al-Kassa and they were going to use the money to free six Americans held by Hizzbulah ( Lebanon ) Jibril , a Palestinian/Syrian, wanted to interrupt the CIA/Al Kassar coalition and take over drug trade by blowing up the jet. Trial was infested with Mossad agents As the trial progressed the light started shining on Israel. At that point the Mossad started a campaign to confuse the issues. This Mossad said him and two Israeli experts who wrote a secret paper on the failures of Pan Am's security. They were willing to give favorable evidence regarding the two Libyans and suggested the Palestinians or Iran may have done it. Mystery witnesses imply that Israel's Mossad covertly rigged the case against Libya. The bereaved relatives and the court get more confused by the second Former Mossad agent Victor Ostroviski has proposed to be a witness in the defense of the two Libyans suspected. He says the two Libyans are innocent. In the final stages of the trial the Mossad presented more crucial evidence hidden away for 12 years until the prosecution team was flat on its back. They blamed Lebanon , Syria and Libya. Abu Nidal suspected Aug. 23 , 2002 -- Accused terrorist Abu Nidal, and not Libya, was behind the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, a former aide to the late leader of the Fatah-Revolutionary Council said in an interview published Friday. Atef Abu Bakr waited till Abu was dead and then informed reporters Abu ' Black September ' was behind it. Abu was a Mossad operative behind Black Sept and handled over 20 hijackings What really happened The bombing of Pan American Flight 103 at Lockerbie in December 1988, was arguably one of the most successful false-flag 'black' operations ever orchestrated by the Jewish State. A Syrian intelligence chief ordered one of his intelligence officer to placed the bomb in a unknowing Syrian female passenger's luggage. The intelligence chief was actually an Israeli agent-in-place. At the time Israel was involved in a brutal campaign against the Palestinians and it had been on Ted Koppel's NightLine for a week ~ the first major exposure of Hanan al-Ashrawi before the American public. Pan Am 103 displaced it from the front pages and it went down the memory hole. Israel realizes this type of attack require little manpower - is impossible to trace - and results in massive publicity. Israelis, after all, inaugurated just about every form of "terrorist" action in the region, from car bombs to hijackings. Expertly, too ~ the King David Hotel was quite well-planned, all the way down to Palestinian clothing. This was typical of an Israeli black op where all clues lead nowhere. At the trial the evidence pointing to Libya fell apart so the Israeli Mossad shifted it to Syria, Lebanon, Iran. As the light began to shine on Israel they said it was a CIA The motive Libya is a oil rich country that hated Israel and were funding the PLO. By blowing up Pan Am 103 the Zionists made turned world opinion against Libya and permitted 'Economic Sanctions' on Libya. Basically, you quietly starve the citizens of the target nation to death without firing any bullets. Israel screws up First problem was the jet took off late and blew up over land leaving evidence - The other problem was Libya allowed two defendants to stand trial which totally threw Israel off it's mark. This was acutely embarrassing for the Zionists, who had no real evidence, and had never really expected the Libyans to hand the 'suspects' over anyway. In order to get around this startling turn of events, the Zionists were obliged to 'rig' the Scottish Court by compromising one of the judges. Source In the end, one Libyan was sentenced on 'evidence' so utterly corrupt that it would be rejected out of hand in any normal court. Even Camp Ziest - with all of Israel's shenanigans only sentenced one of the two defendants to any jail time. No different than Iraq 2004 - Israel has the US spilling their blood while the Israelis are opening a pipeline from Mosul to Haifa. FROM: <a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/Locerbie.htm">judicial-inc.biz/Locerbie.htm</a>

by **nomo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:05 pm

What I'd like to know is how they can recover a suitcase, empty its contents and put it back on the scene when that same suitcase was allegedly used to smuggle the bomb aboard. I mean, you'd think that the explosion would have destroyed the suitcase, and wahtever else it contained.

by **emad** » Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:53 am

The Libyans were convicted on CIA evidence that said a bomb was placed in a suitcase in Frankfurt, originating from a feeder flight. The UK evidence that was whitewashed over said that the heathrow Airport baggage-handling depot that stored freight/cargo for the Pan Am flight was bropken into and tampered with. And that the suppression in this trail was the trump card in wanting to put the Frankfurt/Libyan connection in the frame. True what you said about the explosion: if it destroyed the plane, just think what the suitcase must have lloked like. The only reliable evidence in all this must by the forensic data linking traces of explosive to actual bomb-container(s), likewise detonators.

Police chief claims Lockerbie evidence was faked

Police chief claims Lockerbie evidence was faked

Re: Police chief claims Lockerbie evidence was faked

Re: Police chief claims Lockerbie evidence was faked

Paid Off To Make Payoffs?

Re: Paid Off To Make Payoffs?

More on Lindauer

On the morning of 9/11 the BBC ran a story saying that

Re: On the morning of 9/11 the BBC ran a story saying that

Mossad and Lockerbie

Suitcase trick, or sloppy writing

Re: Suitcase trick, or sloppy writing

Who is online